User talk:DCincarnate: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:58, 12 January 2007

Welcome!

Hello, DCincarnate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

-- Mirage5000 20:55, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Scrier.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Scrier.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Trigonwho.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Trigonwho.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Onslaught21.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Onslaught21.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

"Vast"

Per the WP:CMC the word is inappropriate for modifying the term "superhuman". Please do not add this to articles. Thanks, Chris Griswold (☎☓) 23:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repeating what ChrisHriswold said. HalJor 18:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ares314ou.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ares314ou.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Superman-cape-clouds1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Superman-cape-clouds1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Living Tribunal

I have just discovered that an edit you made about a month ago[1] was copied word for word from another website.[2] In case you aren't aware, this is a very bad thing. Please don't copy the work of other websites onto Wikipedia. 08:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Apocalypse01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Apocalypse01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:AnimatedEvolutionary.png

Thanks for uploading Image:AnimatedEvolutionary.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Man Image

ok we need to come to some middle ground or else we will just keep changing the picture over and over. So here is what I propose, we use this picture. [3]<------ herePhoenix741 00:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ironman

See here --Charlesknight 00:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Galactus

Not a very mature response. You also didn't even notice at how referencing and summarising information can improve an article. Wiki entries are NOT fan sites where posters can just keep adding irrelevant information to gratify themselves.

Asgardian 22:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And again:

Eternity - you didn't even look at the valid point made on the Discussion page before reverting.

Celestials -

"Regardlessly. "

No such word.

"Nothing needs to be changed."

That's opinion.

"Now let's leave it as it is."

It's not just up to you. Wikipedia is a shared site.

Asgardian 04:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Galactus again?

Your most recent revert shows that you either don't understand the intricacies of editing (eg. present tense, links, brevity etc) or simply choose not to listen. I may have to get others involved.

Asgardian 04:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eternity - you didn't even look at the valid point made on the Discussion page before reverting.

And how am I sepose to know that there is a "valid point" on the Discussion page?

Try looking...

Asgardian 04:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No such word.

Think again..[4]

The correct pronounciation is "regardless" or "irrespective".

That's opinion.

It's not just up to you.

Jesus. Everyone here is reverting your edits. No one here agrees on your terms for them.

Well, that's opinion.

Didn't you get blocked from the Man-Beast article? DCincarnate

Yes. I misread the dates, and have learnt a few tricks since then. You would appear to also need some tuition given that some of your reverts are a step backward. Present tense, links and succinct sourced sentences can only help, yes?

Asgardian 04:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 121: / Line 121: @@
 And how am I sepose to know that there is a "valid point" on the Discussion page?
+* Try looking...
+[[User:Asgardian|Asgardian]] 04:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 '''No such word.'''
 Think again..[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Regardlessly]
+* The correct pronounciation is "regardless" or "irrespective".
 '''That's opinion.'''
@@ Line 130: / Line 137: @@
 '''It's not just up to you.'''
-Jesus. Everyone here is reverting your edits. No one here agrees on your terms for them. Didn't you get blocked from the [[Man-Beast]] article? [[user:DCincarnate|DCincarnate]]
+Jesus. Everyone here is reverting your edits. No one here agrees on your terms for them.
+Well, that's opinion.
+Didn't you get blocked from the [[Man-Beast]] article? [[user:DCincarnate|DCincarnate]]
+Yes. I misread the dates, and have learnt a few tricks since then. You would appear to also need some tuition given that some of your reverts are a step backward. Present tense, links and succinct sourced sentences can only help, yes?
+[[User:Asgardian|Asgardian]] 04:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)