User talk:Kingabyan91: Difference between revisions
Dennis Brown (talk | contribs) →Blocked indef: add |
Kingabyan91 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
::I'm willing to unblock you without a lot of fanfare, but I need a promise from you that you will use good edit summaries, don't add or change controversial things without adding sources, and check the talk page of articles and here on your talk page when others are complaining. If they are complaining about edits, STOP making the edits until you figure out a solution. Ask someone for help if you aren't sure what to do. [[WP:Teahouse]] is a great place to help help, btw. I highly recommend it. We want you here, but we NEED you to edit in a way that is more or less consistent with others, and with our rules. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2¢</b>]] 00:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC) |
::I'm willing to unblock you without a lot of fanfare, but I need a promise from you that you will use good edit summaries, don't add or change controversial things without adding sources, and check the talk page of articles and here on your talk page when others are complaining. If they are complaining about edits, STOP making the edits until you figure out a solution. Ask someone for help if you aren't sure what to do. [[WP:Teahouse]] is a great place to help help, btw. I highly recommend it. We want you here, but we NEED you to edit in a way that is more or less consistent with others, and with our rules. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2¢</b>]] 00:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
Ok here is the deal. I will try to be as fair as possible, but I can’t make any promises. Deal? [[User:Kingabyan91|Kingabyan91]] ([[User talk:Kingabyan91#top|talk]]) 23:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:18, 9 April 2021
March 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rhea Ripley have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rhea Ripley was changed by Kingabyan91 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906899 on 2021-03-27T02:46:18+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Kingabyan91, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Kingabyan91! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 27 March 2021 (UTC) |
Ok I will go. Kingabyan91 (talk) 19:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Cedric Alexander. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Editing
I have a question. Why do the computers keep changing my edits? Kingabyan91 (talk) 23:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Blocked indef
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. I've blocked you for an indefinite period of time, but I wanted to explain why. First, I want you to understand that you can be unblocked easily, by any admin who feels you understand the problem that lead to you getting blocked (fellow admin, you don't need to ask me, I trust you).
You keep adding material that is unsourced or simply original research (WP:OR). In other words, it is your interpretation of events, your spin. You can't do that in an encyclopedia. Our job isn't to give our spin on events, it is to document facts AS THEY ARE REPORTED BY OTHER SOURCES. So all your additions are having to be reverted and fixed, which causes work for other people who would rather be adding content instead of patrolling your edits. It becomes a time sink. I don't think you are trying to do anything "bad", but it isn't helpful and you need to understand what you are doing wrong before you can be unblocked. Please read the link WP:OR, and come back here and add a request to be unblocked, assuming you can promise to try to avoid adding this undesirable content. The above box has the text you need to copy and paste to make the request. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Ok number one I wasn’t trying to be unspecific, I was just trying to add facts based on what is currently happening because most of the editors do not put much information. I just wanted you to know. Kingabyan91 (talk) 22:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- I believe you. I don't think you were trying to do anything bad on purpose, but it was causing lots of problems, and you weren't engaging with the people who were trying to help you. That's how we got here. To add information, or change information, where the information might be contentious (other might disagree), you need to have a sourced included. This including changing dates, scores, you need to source it and put the source in the edit. This is key to what we do, WP:V covers this, all information must be verifiable. Granted, not all facts here are sourced, but if a fact is NOT sourced, and someone removes it, you leave it removed until you can add a source. That is part of WP:BRD.
- The big one is how you describe things in an article. You don't use your impression of a fight or match, you use the impression of the SOURCES, the references. Encyclopedia text is going to be a bit dryer than a blog or forum, but that is by design. We don't want lots of extra descriptions, just facts that have been reported by reliable sources, like trade magazines, newspapers and the like. Writing an encyclopedia is a very different animal, and takes some practice. While you practice, you REALLY need to engage with those around you and listen. Some will be super nice, helpful. Some will not. People are people. But you need to politely work with others, even when they aren't so polite, and learn. It's a lot of fun once you get the basics down, but if you are causing extra work for others, it isn't fun for them.
- I'm willing to unblock you without a lot of fanfare, but I need a promise from you that you will use good edit summaries, don't add or change controversial things without adding sources, and check the talk page of articles and here on your talk page when others are complaining. If they are complaining about edits, STOP making the edits until you figure out a solution. Ask someone for help if you aren't sure what to do. WP:Teahouse is a great place to help help, btw. I highly recommend it. We want you here, but we NEED you to edit in a way that is more or less consistent with others, and with our rules. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Ok here is the deal. I will try to be as fair as possible, but I can’t make any promises. Deal? Kingabyan91 (talk) 23:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)