User talk:Jaconsurto: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Report: new section |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{@|NEDOCHAN}}, you're an experienced enough editor at this stage to know that the place to discuss changes to an article are on the talk page of that article, where everyone can see it and participate, and ''not'' on the talk page of a single editor with whom you are in disagreement. [[User:Bastun|<span style="font-family:Verdana, sans-serif">Bastun</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Bastun|Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!]]</sup> 11:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC) |
{{@|NEDOCHAN}}, you're an experienced enough editor at this stage to know that the place to discuss changes to an article are on the talk page of that article, where everyone can see it and participate, and ''not'' on the talk page of a single editor with whom you are in disagreement. [[User:Bastun|<span style="font-family:Verdana, sans-serif">Bastun</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Bastun|Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!]]</sup> 11:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Report == |
|||
== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion == |
|||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:NEDOCHAN|NEDOCHAN]] ([[User talk:NEDOCHAN|talk]]) 11:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:19, 7 November 2021
| This is Jaconsurto's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1 days  |
Nickname in infobox
Hi. We have discussed already on the talk page. Consensus is clear that we go by the nickname as per the infobox source.NEDOCHAN (talk) 10:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Please don't revert. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Conor_McGregor/Archive_1#Nicknames_styles_and_page_protectionNEDOCHAN (talk) 10:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- @NEDOCHAN: No majority whatsoever has been reached in this discussion and if anything i see most editors in disagreement. So i don't know why you would link this. Jaconsurto (talk) 10:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- To show that it's been discussed. Please read Bold revert discuss. If you revert again, I will have to report you. Please, as a new editor, chill a bit.NEDOCHAN (talk) 10:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- @NEDOCHAN: Ha Ha nice try trying to intimidate me. Not gonna work. I'm the one who will win if you report because the administrators will clearly be in my favour because im right in this argument, as just because a topic was discussed does not mean a consensus was reached. Also 3/4 sources in the infobox calls him "The Notorious", so you're argument is wrong there as well. Nice try though Jaconsurto (talk) 11:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Good luck with that attitude. I have made a compromise so let's leave it there.NEDOCHAN (talk) 11:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- @NEDOCHAN: "(The) Notorious"? Tell me you're joking my guy 😂😂 Jaconsurto (talk) 11:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
NEDOCHAN
, you're an experienced enough editor at this stage to know that the place to discuss changes to an article are on the talk page of that article, where everyone can see it and participate, and not on the talk page of a single editor with whom you are in disagreement. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Report
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. NEDOCHAN (talk) 11:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)