Jump to content

Talk:Siege of Malakand: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment (B): banner shell, Military history, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India (Rater)
Assessment (C): banner shell, Military history, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India (Rater)
Line 33: Line 33:
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Military history|class=B|British-task-force=yes|Pakistani=yes|Indian=yes|old-peer-review=yes|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|British-task-force=yes|Pakistani=yes|Indian=yes|old-peer-review=yes|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes}}
{{WikiProject Afghanistan|class=B|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Afghanistan|class=C|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Pakistan|class=B|importance=Mid|Khyber=y|History=y}}
{{WikiProject Pakistan|class=C|importance=Mid|Khyber=y|History=y}}
{{WikiProject India|class=B|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject India|class=C|importance=Mid}}
}}
}}



Revision as of 06:06, 5 January 2022

Former featured articleSiege of Malakand is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 27, 2007.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 6, 2007Good article nomineeListed
June 13, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
July 17, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
January 1, 2022Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 2, 2011, August 2, 2014, August 2, 2017, and August 2, 2021.
Current status: Former featured article

GA pass

Yep, good, interesting. Alientraveller 18:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job!

I would like to give an e-pat-on-the-back to the editors involved in producing this article. Very interesting and well written. Zaindy87 21:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, only just noticed it was "todays featured article" have been offline the past week. SGGH speak! 12:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

commanders

what does this "پشتون" mean? is it just a signature or being used in lieu of a flag?--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 03:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is "Pashtun" in Pashtun, it is being used in lieu of a flag. SGGH ping! 09:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Siege of Malakand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA deficiencies

Churchill, Hobday and Elliott-Lockhart were combatants in this article, which is therefore almost entirely made up of non-independent sources Bumbubookworm (talk) 12:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

I'm looking to re-cite this article, and am hoping no-one will mind too much if I use the Harvard style, one one I'm used to. Amitchell125 (talk) 21:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]