User talk:Vinit bhatt goswami: Difference between revisions
Warning: Edit warring on Bappa Rawal. |
Warning: Three-revert rule on Bappa Rawal. |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article [[Help:Talk pages|talk pages]] to try to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through discussion|consensus]]. If you are unable to agree at [[Talk:Bappa Rawal]], please use one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|dispute resolution options]] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 09:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC) |
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article [[Help:Talk pages|talk pages]] to try to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through discussion|consensus]]. If you are unable to agree at [[Talk:Bappa Rawal]], please use one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|dispute resolution options]] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 09:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Bappa Rawal]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 01:08, 12 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==Welcome!== |
==Welcome!== |
Revision as of 01:08, 12 July 2022
July 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Goswami have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Goswami was changed by Vinit bhatt goswami (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.933908 on 2022-07-10T21:57:07+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Vinit bhatt goswami! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Bappa Rawal several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Bappa Rawal, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Bappa Rawal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kautilya3 (talk) 01:08, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Vinit bhatt goswami, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bappa Rawal did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Introduction tutorial
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC)