User talk:MelbourneStar

Contents

My editing is NOT disruptive

These are reliable edits and if you search online, these are accurate. Please stop reversing my changes now. Rafin12345 (talk) 15:24, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Rafin12345: your editing is disruptive and I'll explain why. My warning to you was the third in a row about you needing to cite reliable sources when you edit/change content as you did not do at The One, and other articles prior. Wikipedia relies on its content to be reliable and verifiable — so far, the changes you've made are not verifiable, as they are unreferenced, and hence: not reliable.

Given you are the one making the changes, you (and only you) are responsible for adding these sources, per WP:ONUS. It is not for me or anyone to verify the content changes you make or to "search online" – that is for you to do. If you continue to add unreferenced content, despite these warnings, you may lose your editing privileges.

Furthermore, the The Skyscraper Center is a verifiable and up-to-date skyscraper database that is used on hundreds if not thousands of articles on Wikipedia. It is now in use on The One article (through its entry on the subject), and its data is very different to the unsourced data you have been adding. If you need help in how to reference, you're welcome to ask me. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 01:31, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Úrsula Corberó she is in an relationship with Spanish actor Miguel Herrán, since 2017. Thank you for accepting my message and i hope that you will understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Pask (talk • contribs) 11:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

@Anna Pask: they're not. You're probably going to get blocked for adding deliberate factual errors. Thanks, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

But please, leave my edit as it was. Anna Pask (talk) 12:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

No. Wikipedia isn't here for you to make unconstructive edits. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Miguel Herrán he is an relationship with Úrsula Corberó, please leave my edit as it was, thanks, i´m begin you. Anna Pask (talk) 12:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

They're not, a simple Google search confirms that. I think you know this too. You're wasting your time, it takes one second to revert your edit. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:16, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

can i ask you something? Anna Pask (talk) 12:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

google from where does google get the data for the original page of some data? Not wikipedia Anna Pask (talk) 12:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

And also look how cute they´re together and i think that they are together.. their eye contacts... Anna Pask (talk) 12:24, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Why my edit had been reversed

Can u please explain why my edit got reverse Anshul Srivastava.21 (talk) 12:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

I was editing that article before the reply but the Wikipedia told me someone has edited please try after sometime That's why edited afterward — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anshul Srivastava.21 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

@Anshul Srivastava.21: I've self-reverted, given you probably did encounter an edit conflict. In future though, if you're going to edit your previous comments to remove statements/meaning (inline with WP:TALK#REPLIED) that you strikeout the content -- so others are aware of the changes you've made to your comments, especially if someone else has already responded to the original comment.

Having followed that discussion from afar, I'd also encourage you to re-read 331dot's comment which is a really fitting way to end the topic of discussion once and for all. Thanks, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Parks discussion

Hello MelbourneStar! Your input is requested for a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Draft proposal for the future of WP:APARKS. Any feedback is welcome. Thank you.

You are receiving this message as your username is listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Participants

Adog (Talk・Cont) 02:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

vandalism

melbourne star i am here on my main account to tell you why i reversed your edit (if you have not read my response not logged in). i will wait for a response from you Abdullah raji (talk) 08:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

@Abdullah raji: which edit does this concern? —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

so it was in litirature prize part where it said after "the nobel litirature prize has many controversies" it said "snubs" wich is very mean and violates the guidlines of wikipedia by not providing a completely neutral standpoint Abdullah raji (talk) 13:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)