Talk:Google: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
== Free Speech Law Denier Google |
== Free Speech Law Denier Google deletes every negative Google Maps review without Notification and trick you even == |
||
They show your review only for you, so you dont get suspicious. But the public cant see it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:DC:CF20:4D00:FCDA:EAAF:E941:2583|2003:DC:CF20:4D00:FCDA:EAAF:E941:2583]] ([[User talk:2003:DC:CF20:4D00:FCDA:EAAF:E941:2583#top|talk]]) 18:56, 21 March 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
They show your review only for you, so you dont get suspicious. But the public cant see it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:DC:CF20:4D00:FCDA:EAAF:E941:2583|2003:DC:CF20:4D00:FCDA:EAAF:E941:2583]] ([[User talk:2003:DC:CF20:4D00:FCDA:EAAF:E941:2583#top|talk]]) 18:56, 21 March 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 06:26, 29 March 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Google article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:Vital article
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Google CodeF was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 2 February 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Google. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Criticism of Google was copied or moved into Google with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2016 and 2017. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 42 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Free Speech Law Denier Google deletes every negative Google Maps review without Notification and trick you even
They show your review only for you, so you dont get suspicious. But the public cant see it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DC:CF20:4D00:FCDA:EAAF:E941:2583 (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Edit that says Google is an "United States-based company".
I elect to undo this wording as it is not consistent with the rest of Wikipedia's pages on Silicon Valley companies and other American multinationals. Googles own parent, Alphabet inc, uses the term "American multinational", as does Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, Symantec, Broadcom, Intel, AMD General Motors, Ford, Facebook, Twitter, and etc. Taking this into account, it does not make sense to undo consistency and change the wording. Otherwise, we should then change it for the rest of Silicon Valley's thousands of companies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sciophobiaranger (talk • contribs) 18:05, July 16, 2020 (UTC)
1,000 Languages Initiative / Universal Speech Model
I haven't seen any mention of this here, or on any other Wikipedia pages:
- Google’s one step closer to building its 1,000-language AI model — The Verge, March 6, 2023
- Universal Speech Model (USM): State-of-the-art speech AI for 100+ languages — Google Research Blog, March 6, 2023
Not sure where in the article this could go? Or is there a special page regarding Google's AI & ML research? Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 03:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia former articles for improvement
- B-Class Google articles
- Top-importance Google articles
- WikiProject Google articles
- B-Class Internet culture articles
- High-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- B-Class Websites articles
- Top-importance Websites articles
- B-Class Websites articles of Top-importance
- B-Class Computing articles
- Top-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- B-Class California articles
- High-importance California articles
- B-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- High-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class Stanford University articles
- Low-importance Stanford University articles
- WikiProject Stanford University articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- B-Class company articles
- Top-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Internet articles
- Top-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- B-Class Brands articles
- Top-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Former good article nominees
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions