Jump to content

User talk:Dac gori032: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m + Section header
Line 6: Line 6:
:Kind Regards,
:Kind Regards,
:DAC. [[User:Dac gori032|Dac gori032]] ([[User talk:Dac gori032#top|talk]]) 22:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
:DAC. [[User:Dac gori032|Dac gori032]] ([[User talk:Dac gori032#top|talk]]) 22:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
== Editwarring ==

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Trinity the Tuck]]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#In talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[WP:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Trinity the Tuck]]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#In talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[WP:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.



Revision as of 22:35, 6 May 2023

May 2023

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Trinity the Tuck, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime Could you elaborate? These are unfortunately real thing that happened. I understand that you may think its "pourly sourced" but I would like to have a discussion with you. I do not agree with you, you don't agree with me. That is fine. But we as editors have to find the middelground.
Kind Regards,
DAC. Dac gori032 (talk) 22:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editwarring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Trinity the Tuck. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

stop See above. Materialscientist (talk) 22:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]