Talk:Surrender of Japan: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Surrender of Japan/Archive 3) (bot |
Wretchskull (talk | contribs) →FAR needed: new section |
||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
:{{Not done}}. The existing grammar is fine. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 16:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC) |
:{{Not done}}. The existing grammar is fine. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 16:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC) |
||
== FAR needed == |
|||
A 2009 FA with notable issues: |
|||
*Countless sentences and paragraphs without refs. |
|||
*The article overuses quotes and blockquotes, of which many are lengthy. |
|||
*Some large paragraphs only supported by one citation at the end. |
|||
*Many webpages referenced when they're better covered by high-quality academic books and journals. |
|||
*More than a third (73/185) of all citations rely only on Frank 1999 and Hasegawa 2005 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Surrender_of_Japan&oldid=1154495095#Footnotes as of now]. |
|||
*Thousands of new, quality texts on this vital topic exist in TWL. Some are definitely due for inclusion. |
|||
*Citations and explanatory notes are mixed, but the problem is that different refstyles are used for each note. |
|||
Pinging FAC nominators {{u|Wwoods}} and {{u|Raul654}}. [[User:Wretchskull|Wretchskull]] ([[User talk:Wretchskull|talk]]) 10:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:43, 30 June 2023
Surrender of Japan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 15, 2020. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Index
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Were the atom bombs the main reason for surrender?
According to these Stanford and MIT professors[1] [2], later released docs show that it was known that it was well-known that the main condition the Japanese wanted was that no harm would come to the emperor and that Truman finally signaled he would abide by this only after the two bombs were dropped.
Jewel Voice Broadcast ➡ Hirohito surrender broadcast
Please change "Jewel Voice Broadcast" to Hirohito surrender broadcast, per the revent move of that page (because Jewel Voice Broadcast is, it turns out, a 2006 Wikipedia user-spawned neologism).
Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It should say the British Empire instead of Great Britain in the lede. Jgins (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Done Good catch. I replaced it with United Kingdom as the most recognizable term; I think British Empire may place undue emphasis on the UK's global spread, which isn't super relevant to its role in the Potsdam Declaration etc. Ovinus (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect info under Further surrenders and resistance
Under the section titled "Further surrenders and resistance", the last sentence reads:
"Some may never have heard of it. Teruo Nakamura, the last known holdout, emerged from his hidden retreat in what was now independent Indonesia in December 1974, while two other Japanese soldiers, who had joined Communist guerrillas at the end of the war, fought in southern Thailand until 1991."
According to this Associated Press article: https://apnews.com/article/ade6f55bfed4013ad1b7b4e955e9d1ae
...that last bit of information in bold is incorrect. The two Japanese men fought in Malaysia, not Thailand, and they returned to Japan in early 1990, not 1991. 166.181.80.38 (talk) 09:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 June 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Simple spelling mistake/typo. "the Emperor's will that Japan surrender."
Change "Afterward, Tōgō told Suzuki that there was no hope of getting better terms, and Kido conveyed the Emperor's will that Japan surrender.".
To
"Afterward, Tōgō told Suzuki that there was no hope of getting better terms, and Kido conveyed the Emperor's will that Japan surrenders."
Or rewrite this part entirely. 109.235.37.171 (talk) 13:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not done. The existing grammar is fine. Binksternet (talk) 16:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
FAR needed
A 2009 FA with notable issues:
- Countless sentences and paragraphs without refs.
- The article overuses quotes and blockquotes, of which many are lengthy.
- Some large paragraphs only supported by one citation at the end.
- Many webpages referenced when they're better covered by high-quality academic books and journals.
- More than a third (73/185) of all citations rely only on Frank 1999 and Hasegawa 2005 as of now.
- Thousands of new, quality texts on this vital topic exist in TWL. Some are definitely due for inclusion.
- Citations and explanatory notes are mixed, but the problem is that different refstyles are used for each note.
Pinging FAC nominators Wwoods and Raul654. Wretchskull (talk) 10:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- FA-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- FA-Class United States articles of High-importance
- FA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- FA-Class Soviet Union articles
- High-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles
- FA-Class Russia articles
- High-importance Russia articles
- High-importance FA-Class Russia articles
- FA-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- FA-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- FA-Class military history articles
- FA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- FA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- FA-Class Canadian military history articles
- Canadian military history task force articles
- FA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- FA-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- FA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- FA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- FA-Class Japan-related articles
- Top-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- FA-Class former country articles
- WikiProject Former countries articles
- FA-Class history articles
- Top-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles