Jump to content

Talk:Surrender of Japan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Surrender of Japan/Archive 3) (bot
FAR needed: new section
Line 102: Line 102:


:{{Not done}}. The existing grammar is fine. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 16:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
:{{Not done}}. The existing grammar is fine. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 16:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

== FAR needed ==

A 2009 FA with notable issues:
*Countless sentences and paragraphs without refs.
*The article overuses quotes and blockquotes, of which many are lengthy.
*Some large paragraphs only supported by one citation at the end.
*Many webpages referenced when they're better covered by high-quality academic books and journals.
*More than a third (73/185) of all citations rely only on Frank 1999 and Hasegawa 2005 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Surrender_of_Japan&oldid=1154495095#Footnotes as of now].
*Thousands of new, quality texts on this vital topic exist in TWL. Some are definitely due for inclusion.
*Citations and explanatory notes are mixed, but the problem is that different refstyles are used for each note.

Pinging FAC nominators {{u|Wwoods}} and {{u|Raul654}}. [[User:Wretchskull|Wretchskull]] ([[User talk:Wretchskull|talk]]) 10:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:43, 30 June 2023

Template:Vital article

Featured articleSurrender of Japan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 15, 2020.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 17, 2005Articles for deletionKept
November 14, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 21, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 15, 2007, August 15, 2008, August 15, 2009, August 15, 2010, August 15, 2011, August 15, 2013, and August 15, 2015.
Current status: Featured article

Were the atom bombs the main reason for surrender?

According to these Stanford and MIT professors[1] [2], later released docs show that it was known that it was well-known that the main condition the Japanese wanted was that no harm would come to the emperor and that Truman finally signaled he would abide by this only after the two bombs were dropped.

Jewel Voice Broadcast ➡ Hirohito surrender broadcast

Please change "Jewel Voice Broadcast" to Hirohito surrender broadcast, per the revent move of that page (because Jewel Voice Broadcast is, it turns out, a 2006 Wikipedia user-spawned neologism).

Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2022

It should say the British Empire instead of Great Britain in the lede. Jgins (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Good catch. I replaced it with United Kingdom as the most recognizable term; I think British Empire may place undue emphasis on the UK's global spread, which isn't super relevant to its role in the Potsdam Declaration etc. Ovinus (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect info under Further surrenders and resistance

Under the section titled "Further surrenders and resistance", the last sentence reads:

"Some may never have heard of it. Teruo Nakamura, the last known holdout, emerged from his hidden retreat in what was now independent Indonesia in December 1974, while two other Japanese soldiers, who had joined Communist guerrillas at the end of the war, fought in southern Thailand until 1991."

According to this Associated Press article: https://apnews.com/article/ade6f55bfed4013ad1b7b4e955e9d1ae

...that last bit of information in bold is incorrect. The two Japanese men fought in Malaysia, not Thailand, and they returned to Japan in early 1990, not 1991. 166.181.80.38 (talk) 09:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 June 2023

Simple spelling mistake/typo. "the Emperor's will that Japan surrender."

Change "Afterward, Tōgō told Suzuki that there was no hope of getting better terms, and Kido conveyed the Emperor's will that Japan surrender.".

To

"Afterward, Tōgō told Suzuki that there was no hope of getting better terms, and Kido conveyed the Emperor's will that Japan surrenders."

Or rewrite this part entirely. 109.235.37.171 (talk) 13:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The existing grammar is fine. Binksternet (talk) 16:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FAR needed

A 2009 FA with notable issues:

  • Countless sentences and paragraphs without refs.
  • The article overuses quotes and blockquotes, of which many are lengthy.
  • Some large paragraphs only supported by one citation at the end.
  • Many webpages referenced when they're better covered by high-quality academic books and journals.
  • More than a third (73/185) of all citations rely only on Frank 1999 and Hasegawa 2005 as of now.
  • Thousands of new, quality texts on this vital topic exist in TWL. Some are definitely due for inclusion.
  • Citations and explanatory notes are mixed, but the problem is that different refstyles are used for each note.

Pinging FAC nominators Wwoods and Raul654. Wretchskull (talk) 10:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]