Talk:James Clerk Maxwell: Difference between revisions
→science: new section |
|||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
{{reflist-talk}} |
{{reflist-talk}} |
||
== science == |
|||
James clerk maxwell explainition [[Special:Contributions/64.226.63.194|64.226.63.194]] ([[User talk:64.226.63.194|talk]]) 23:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:44, 18 November 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James Clerk Maxwell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 4 months |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
James Clerk Maxwell has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:Vital article
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Maxwell
Sadly, no mention of his silver hammer? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:2E0A:B101:244D:3422:F291:EC79 (talk) 17:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wrong Maxwell. You need the Maxwell Edison article. SpinningSpark 17:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Trinity
Maxwell believed in the Trinity. There is a good thoughtful post about this at https://www.cslewis.org/journal/physics-and-christian-theology-beauty-a-common-dialect/. This should be included in the article. ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- That post doesn't mention Maxwell. It doesn't mention the Trinity either. Schazjmd (talk) 23:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Schazjmd: Actually it does. You have to click through the pages to find it, or else click on "all". However, what was actually posted in the article was not "Maxwell believed in the Trinity", but that belief in the Trinity led to Maxwell's equations, which was why I reverted it. I'm not sure that I understand why it is so important to state this was one of Maxwell's beliefs. Surely that follows from his religion which is already well covered in the article? I'm pretty sure he would have believed in Jesus too, but I don't see any need to state it explicitly. Anyway, as I pointed out in detail on my talk page, that source is so full of nonsense there is no way we should treat it as reliable for anything. SpinningSpark 12:26, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- This article makes a logical argument. ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Spinningspark, I didn't see that it was a multi-page article. Schazjmd (talk) 15:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Schazjmd: Actually it does. You have to click through the pages to find it, or else click on "all". However, what was actually posted in the article was not "Maxwell believed in the Trinity", but that belief in the Trinity led to Maxwell's equations, which was why I reverted it. I'm not sure that I understand why it is so important to state this was one of Maxwell's beliefs. Surely that follows from his religion which is already well covered in the article? I'm pretty sure he would have believed in Jesus too, but I don't see any need to state it explicitly. Anyway, as I pointed out in detail on my talk page, that source is so full of nonsense there is no way we should treat it as reliable for anything. SpinningSpark 12:26, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Spelling error
Since article is locked, I guess I post here. Under: Scientific Legacy > Colour Vision "metameres" should just be "metamers" Cartler (talk) 02:46, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Done. I've confirmed your account so you should be able to edit the page yourself now. But I think you only needed one more edit to be auto-confirmed anyway. SpinningSpark 17:06, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Shoulders of Maxwell
"Einstein, when he visited the University of Cambridge in 1922, was told by his host that he had done great things because he stood on Newton's shoulders; Einstein replied: "No I don't. I stand on the shoulders of Maxwell."[1]" On looking up the reference, it is discovered that the book attributes the story to something "recounted by the American physicist Frederick Seitz". Seitz was born in 1911 in the US and would have been 11 in 1922. It is not clear he ever went to Cambridge or who he got the story from. "The Fire i' the Flint" doesn't give a reference for Seitz's story. It sounds like the kind of thing people want Einstein to have said. Removed as it falls well short of Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources. It appears from Seitz's Wikipedia article that he was "a central figure amongst global warming deniers" and that he "played a key role... in helping the tobacco industry produce uncertainty concerning the health impacts of smoking." Burraron (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- A paper in the Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society gives a different version of the story, that Einstein made the statement to a group of reporters in England on his first visit after the war. Schazjmd (talk) 14:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ Mary Shine Thompson, 2009, The Fire i' the Flint, p. 103; Four Courts
science
James clerk maxwell explainition 64.226.63.194 (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class physics articles
- Top-importance physics articles
- GA-Class physics articles of Top-importance
- GA-Class physics biographies articles
- Physics biographies articles
- GA-Class mathematics articles
- Unknown-priority mathematics articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Top-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- GA-Class biography (core) articles
- Core biography articles
- Top-importance biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class University of Cambridge articles
- GA-Class Scotland articles
- High-importance Scotland articles
- All WikiProject Scotland pages
- GA-Class history of science articles
- Top-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles
- GA-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- GA-Class philosopher articles
- Low-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- GA-Class philosophy of science articles
- Low-importance philosophy of science articles
- Philosophy of science task force articles
- GA-Class Modern philosophy articles
- Low-importance Modern philosophy articles
- Modern philosophy task force articles
- GA-Class energy articles
- Mid-importance energy articles
- GA-Class electrical engineering articles
- Top-importance electrical engineering articles
- Electrical engineering articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press