Jump to content

User talk:Croystron: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
A lengthy welcome
Line 48: Line 48:


I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --[[User:Hipal|Hipal]] ([[User talk:Hipal|talk]]) 02:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --[[User:Hipal|Hipal]] ([[User talk:Hipal|talk]]) 02:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

== Please use proper formatting ==

You have already been told about the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]], but you have made countless edits ignoring it, such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michele_Carey&oldid=1186588546|here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michele_Carey&oldid=1187014781|here]. Please italicize film and TV series titles correctly. [[User:Nicholas0|Nicholas0]] ([[User talk:Nicholas0|talk]]) 12:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:19, 27 November 2023

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Croystron! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider providing edit summaries; thank you! ... ;-) ...

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(become old-fashioned!) 16:07, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Information icon Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Melia Kreiling. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Thedarkknightli (talk) 13:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A lengthy welcome

Hi Croystron. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 02:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please use proper formatting

You have already been told about the Manual of Style, but you have made countless edits ignoring it, such as [1] and [2]. Please italicize film and TV series titles correctly. Nicholas0 (talk) 12:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]