Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aman.kumar.goel: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Comment, marking case as closed (using spihelper.js)
Tag: Reverted
reply
Tag: Reverted
Line 30: Line 30:


*This SPI is a copy-paste of previously refuted filing found at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Georgethedragonslayer/Archive]]. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 10:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
*This SPI is a copy-paste of previously refuted filing found at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Georgethedragonslayer/Archive]]. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 10:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

*This SPI is a copy-paste of previously refuted filing found at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Georgethedragonslayer/Archive]]. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 10:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
:Indeed it has diffs from previously filed SPI case but those were clearly not {{tq|refuted}}. The check was not even performed and this is exactly "normal" in SPI cases of Aman.kumar.goel. They became so experienced to game the system, tricking Administrators into believing that they were clean [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aman.kumar.goel/Archive|in their past SPI cases]].

:The have mastered it so much that initial check by [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] found nothing in the SPI case[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aman.kumar.goel/Archive#02_December_2023] filed by [[User:Beccaynr|Beccaynr]].

:The extent of their abuse using multiple accounts to influence consensus and disruptive edits definitely warrant a through checking.


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 15:28, 7 January 2024

Aman.kumar.goel

Aman.kumar.goel (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aman.kumar.goel/Archive.


07 January 2024

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

There is good amount of editing pattern and style to believe it is a sock of AKG for doing other stuffs including helping AKG to influence consensus on various contentious article (like this where AKG is involved.

Some evidences are:

  • Georgethedragonslayer making same edit[1] as Aman.kumar.goel[2] in the same article.
  • Again Georgethedragonslayer[3] and Aman.kumar.goel[4]
  • And again Georgethedragonslayer[5] and Aman.kumar.goel[6]

Both trying to block me using SPI Georgethedragonslayer[7] and Aman.kumar.goel[8]

Please, note that I opened a SPI case 2 years ago about this socking including User:Gopalam Reddy[9] which was not checked but later 2 of the 3 accounts were indeed blocked for socking.

I guess they are using some sort of proxies to evade the results but even meat-puppetry through off-wiki is evident. Requesting a through check this time please giving the extent of abuse by Aman.kumar.goel and his sock User:Editorkamran.

Thank you. Bringtar (talk) 08:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Indeed it has diffs from previously filed SPI case but those were clearly not refuted. The check was not even performed and this is exactly "normal" in SPI cases of Aman.kumar.goel. They became so experienced to game the system, tricking Administrators into believing that they were clean in their past SPI cases.
The have mastered it so much that initial check by Drmies found nothing in the SPI case[10] filed by Beccaynr.
The extent of their abuse using multiple accounts to influence consensus and disruptive edits definitely warrant a through checking.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments