User talk:Tomlovesfar: Difference between revisions
Tomlovesfar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→A word of advice regarding speedy deletion: new section |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
:Thank you for pointing that out to me. Can you tell me how to handle certain articles that are either ads or contain original research? Of course I can flag it, but as you can see, a few posts like these have been flagged over the past year, and still nothing has changed. So is there anyway to remove a page like that?. Thank you once again [[User:Tomlovesfar|Tomlovesfar]] ([[User talk:Tomlovesfar#top|talk]]) 01:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
:Thank you for pointing that out to me. Can you tell me how to handle certain articles that are either ads or contain original research? Of course I can flag it, but as you can see, a few posts like these have been flagged over the past year, and still nothing has changed. So is there anyway to remove a page like that?. Thank you once again [[User:Tomlovesfar|Tomlovesfar]] ([[User talk:Tomlovesfar#top|talk]]) 01:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
== A word of advice regarding speedy deletion == |
|||
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you added an incorrect speedy deletion tag to [[Nirnaya Shrestha]]. Articles are only eligible for speedy deletion in a very limited set of circumstances, and the criterion you cited, [[WP:CSD#A3]] does is only valid if the article literally has no content. Since the article, or a previous version of it, makes a [[WP:CCS|credible claim of significance]] it is not eligible for A7 either. Regards, decltype (talk) 14:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC) <code>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</code> <small>([[User talk:Decltype|talk]])</small> 14:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:19, 26 February 2024
This is Tomlovesfar's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
February 2024
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Avicii. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. MOS:DUPLINK second notice. TylerBurden (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Crypto Browser moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Crypto Browser. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Significa liberdade
- Thank you for your feedback. I've added two sources, and I think that it is ready to be published as the topic is new and there are only a few research books and articles about this particular topic, so should I leave it as a draft or should I submit it for review? Tomlovesfar (talk) 03:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- I would suggest submitting it for review. If it still needs extra work to meet Wikipedia's guidelines, the reviewer should let you know what you can do to improve it. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Crypto Browser (February 20)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crypto Browser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Tomlovesfar!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
|
Draftify
Hi Tomlovesfar, I noticed you moved Speedcubing and European BEST Engineering Competition to draft space but articles over 90 days old should not be draftified. You can read more at WP:Deletion policy#Incubation. S0091 (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing that out to me. Can you tell me how to handle certain articles that are either ads or contain original research? Of course I can flag it, but as you can see, a few posts like these have been flagged over the past year, and still nothing has changed. So is there anyway to remove a page like that?. Thank you once again Tomlovesfar (talk) 01:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
A word of advice regarding speedy deletion
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you added an incorrect speedy deletion tag to Nirnaya Shrestha. Articles are only eligible for speedy deletion in a very limited set of circumstances, and the criterion you cited, WP:CSD#A3 does is only valid if the article literally has no content. Since the article, or a previous version of it, makes a credible claim of significance it is not eligible for A7 either. Regards, decltype (talk) 14:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC) decltype
(talk) 14:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)