User talk:Historyonlyfavoursvictors: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:34, 10 April 2024

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Historyonlyfavoursvictors! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Rrjmrrr (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alauddin Khalji's conquest of Ranthambore, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 20:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Khanwa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Imperial ^[AFCND] 01:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Historyonlyfavoursvictors, please see Wikipedia:CSV to know about citing sources. Like as you did at Battle of Khanwa, it is not how we properly cite sources. Kindly respond to this message, or this behaviour may leads to the loss of editing privileges. Imperial ^[AFCND] 09:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ImperialAficionado I have already cited sources please check Historyonlyfavoursvictors (talk) 09:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ImperialAficionado I understand your concern. but I have already cited sources please do check.

Haridas Kesaria was one of the commanders of Rana Sanga who gave up his life fighting for Rana Sanga Historyonlyfavoursvictors (talk) 09:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Battle Of Khanwa My Friend Please Check Sources which I had cited earlier also Historyonlyfavoursvictors (talk) 09:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you drop the link of the source here? With the page number helps. Please understand the thing that you are citing sources in wrong way. Another user have raised the same concern against you [1].Imperial ^[AFCND] 09:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ImperialAficionado of course and sorry for the inconveniences I have caused you Historyonlyfavoursvictors (talk) 09:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a problem for me, but consider reading WP:EDIT WARRING, WP:CS, and WP:Vandalism. And consider asking your doubts at WP: TEAHOUSE, where the experienced editors will guide you. Here, for battle of Khanwa, provide the source and context that you need to get added into that article. Imperial ^[AFCND] 09:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Battle of Khanwa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Imperial ^[AFCND] 09:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 :::Could you drop the link of the source here? With the page number helps. Please understand the thing that you are citing sources in wrong way. Another user have raised the same concern against you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alauddin_Khalji%27s_conquest_of_Jalore&diff=prev&oldid=1218187592].[[User:ImperialAficionado|<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; color:Blue;">Imperial</span>]][[User talk:ImperialAficionado|<span style="font-family: 'Garamond'; color:Purple;"><sup><nowiki>[AFCND]</nowiki></sup></span>]] 09:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 ::::@[[User:ImperialAficionado|ImperialAficionado]] of course and sorry for the inconveniences I have caused you [[User:Historyonlyfavoursvictors|Historyonlyfavoursvictors]] ([[User talk:Historyonlyfavoursvictors#top|talk]]) 09:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
+:::::It is not a problem for me, but consider reading [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|WP:EDIT WARRING]], WP:CS, and [[WP:Vandalism]]. And consider asking your doubts at [[Wikipedia:Teahouse|WP: TEAHOUSE]], where the experienced editors will guide you. Here, for battle of Khanwa, provide the source and context that you need to get added into that article. [[User:ImperialAficionado|<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; color:Blue;">Imperial</span>]][[User talk:ImperialAficionado|<span style="font-family: 'Garamond'; color:Purple;"><sup><nowiki>[AFCND]</nowiki></sup></span>]] 09:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 == Edit warring  ==