User talk:RayScript

Archives (Index)

1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florida Digital Service has been accepted

Florida Digital Service, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

X (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Article submission

Hi, I wrote this article and could not submit because my account is new. Could you help review/edit and submit it? Thanks https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pro-Palestine_Activism_at_Radboud_University_Nijmegen 185.107.44.168 (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Please sign in (not editing with IP) so you can get responses from me. Thanks for reaching out though, it's a good idea (I know the rejections here can be rough)! I'm not so sure about the rule S0091 is citing. Honestly, I'm only a moderately experienced editor and this is a bit out of my knowledge area. Maybe @CommunityNotesContributor could provide some guidance on this situation. Is it okay for someone that meets the extended confirmed status to edit this and continue to resubmit the draft? Or if CommunityNotesContributor can submit a review of what should be fixed to make it ready to move out of draft that would be super helpful too. RayScript (talk) 11:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

The rule S0091 is citing is in reference to WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, by the looks of it that shouldn't be an issue but would need to look into it further (unfortunately my Dutch is very limited though). Anyone can edit a draft per WP:DRAFT, so if you are able to improve it I'd be happy to assist. I'll look at doing a review for you if you're willing to work on it. If you can bring it up to the standards of 2024 University of Amsterdam pro-Palestinian campus occupation it should have no problem. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

To correct myself, the initial rejection was due to WP:ARBECR. So if you are an WP:XC then you can improve article and resubmit. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)