User talk:Ivanvector: Difference between revisions
→Administrators' newsletter – August 2024: new section Tag: |
Tonkarooson (talk | contribs) →Blocked IP: new section |
||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)</small>}} |
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)</small>}} |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1238586059 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1238586059 --> |
||
== Blocked [[IP address|IP]] == |
|||
Hello, I have seen you blocked this [[Special:Contributions/2600:387:0:0:0:0:0:0/40|IP]]. This limitation is preventing myself on making a new account for [[Wikipedia:Security|security]]. I was wondering if you could do something to help me out with this problem. Thanks. [[User:Tonkarooson|Tonkarooson]] ([[User talk:Tonkarooson|discuss]]). 03:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:44, 24 August 2024
Ivanvector has recently suffered a significant loss and is grieving. Consequently, his ability to work on Wikipedia and his time available to do so may be affected – an unplanned short wikibreak is also possible. Your patience with delays in handling Wikipedia responsibilities and in responding to talk page messages or e-mails is appreciated, as is your compassion and understanding. Thank you. |
SCAM WARNING! If you have been contacted or solicited by anyone asking for payment to get a draft into article space, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article, such offers are not legitimate and you should contact paid-en-wpwikipedia.org immediately. Please see this page for more information. |
Click here to email me. Emails sent through this form are private, however I may share their content privately with other users for administrative purposes. Please do not use {{ygm}} on this page: if you email me I will have already received an on-wiki notification. |
Archives: Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 |
|
Juno (film)
Hey. On the page you have protected indefinitely, the disruptive editor's behavior is not compatible with WP:DEADNAME: "Paraphrase, elide, or use square brackets to replace portions of quotations to avoid deadnaming or misgendering". Since the user doesn't follow the warnings and is extendedconfirmed, I did not request another page protection, but this should be dealt with. ภץאคгöร 11:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
16th July 2024
@Ivanvector, please check this user Truthfindervert and his SPI investigation, he moved years old article Ahluwalia (caste) into draft[1] even with wrong edit summary he is also making articles with poor sources and inaccurate titles like Draft:Kalsi (caste)[2] Kalsi is not a caste but a clan/tribe of Ramgharia caste itself, and Dhanoa Jats (caste) [3] and Jat is a caste Dhanoa is a tribe/clan of the caste not a separate caste Truthfindervert, Khalsajudicary, and Prabh Singh Bains they also belonged to same sockfarm agency. See their Interactions Prabh Singh Bains/Truthfindervert/Khalsajudicary[4] @MathXplore, @Bbb.223.123.2.217 (talk) 14:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ivanvector, I've blocked the IP for a week as a proxy.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:56, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: I've been battling a few UPE sockfarms on Special:Contributions/223.123.0.0/19 for a while now, it's a cesspool of spam. MathXplore has been dealing with it on simple. I doubt it's coincidence that this proxy showed up in that range and also pinged both of us. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- I saw your range block, but I didn't look any further as to what was going on. Why did they ping me?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- You've probably blocked some of their socks. There's one sockfarm in particular that has been incredibly persistent, probably hundreds of accounts this year alone. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- I saw your range block, but I didn't look any further as to what was going on. Why did they ping me?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: I've been battling a few UPE sockfarms on Special:Contributions/223.123.0.0/19 for a while now, it's a cesspool of spam. MathXplore has been dealing with it on simple. I doubt it's coincidence that this proxy showed up in that range and also pinged both of us. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Case request
Andy the Grump and Andy Dingley are entirely different people, FYI. 28bytes (talk) 18:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Facepalm Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- I replied to your post at RFAR (in my own section). In theory, this means you can't remove it. But if you prefer to solve this by just removing your section, instead of crossing it out because it's been replied to, feel free. I'll just delete my comment too. Floquenbeam (talk) 18:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think I'll leave it to the clerks to remove it if they think they should. Andy Dingley has a history of personal attacks himself, and I think my underlying point about wondering why we're coming down like a ton of bricks on Thryduulf for referencing an aspersion cast by someone else, while not talking about that someone else at all, is valid. It doesn't seem like there's a case coming out of this anyway. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sandstein's response to the whole thing has been extremely weird. Focusing entirely on my quote rather than what I quoted or the entire context in which I quoted it. Thryduulf (talk) 19:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- User:Thryduulf I agree. You quoted a troll post, and Sandstein came down on you as an admin rather on the troll. I would have understood coming down on both of you, or only on Dingley. I know that standards for admins are higher, but .... Robert McClenon (talk) 02:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sandstein's response to the whole thing has been extremely weird. Focusing entirely on my quote rather than what I quoted or the entire context in which I quoted it. Thryduulf (talk) 19:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think I'll leave it to the clerks to remove it if they think they should. Andy Dingley has a history of personal attacks himself, and I think my underlying point about wondering why we're coming down like a ton of bricks on Thryduulf for referencing an aspersion cast by someone else, while not talking about that someone else at all, is valid. It doesn't seem like there's a case coming out of this anyway. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- I replied to your post at RFAR (in my own section). In theory, this means you can't remove it. But if you prefer to solve this by just removing your section, instead of crossing it out because it's been replied to, feel free. I'll just delete my comment too. Floquenbeam (talk) 18:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
On the case of the many Andys
Re Special:Diff/1235111790 you are not the first to make that mistake and I'd be surprised if you were the last! I very nearly conflated the two users in the original discussion on Sandstein's talk page but fortunately spotted before I hit publish. Thryduulf (talk) 18:56, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- I did think that there was at least as much reason to list Andy Dingley as a party as to list Thryduulf. It may be that the only reason I knew the difference was that I knew which one had insulted me in the DRV after I rebuked him. The good-faith explanation is that, for some reason, Andy Dingley was unintentionally playing the role of a troll, making an insulting remark to see how much confusion and anger he could cause. The answer to that question is: A whole lot; too much. AndyTheGrump would not do that, because when he insults another editor, he does it directly. Since you weren't involved in either kerfuffle, I understand how you confused two difficult editors with similar names. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Sock suspect
A user User:Dabuno blocked by you seems to have come back, user:Dooblts has similar edits like him. 2409:4085:486:1067:A449:1BA:CD1:DE94 (talk) 14:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 04:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 04:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikiproject
Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Emu and the Jabiru, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 12:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).
- Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
- Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.
- The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ
Blocked IP
Hello, I have seen you blocked this IP. This limitation is preventing myself on making a new account for security. I was wondering if you could do something to help me out with this problem. Thanks. Tonkarooson (discuss). 03:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)