Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions
InedibleHulk (talk | contribs) m →Thai school bus crash: OK, last time. |
Mr. Lechkar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
==== RD: Michel Blanc ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Michel Blanc |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.lemonde.fr/en/obituaries/article/2024/10/04/french-actor-michel-blanc-dies-at-72_6728214_15.html ''Le Monde''], [https://www.theguardian.com/film/2024/oct/06/michel-blanc-star-of-monsieur-hire-dies-aged-72 ''The Guardian''], [https://www.bfmtv.com/people/cinema/direct-mort-de-michel-blanc-gerard-jugnot-rend-hommage-a-l-acteur_LN-202410040327.html BFMTV] |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = Mr. Lechkar <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
}} |
|||
Notable French actor. [[User:Mr. Lechkar|Mr. Lechkar]] ([[User talk:Mr. Lechkar|talk]]) 23:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: Greg Landry ==== |
==== RD: Greg Landry ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
Revision as of 23:27, 6 October 2024
Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers
Voicing an opinion on an itemFormat your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...
Please do not...
Suggesting updatesThere are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives
October 6
October 6, 2024
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Law and crime
Science and technology
|
Sinking of HMNZS Manawanui
Blurb: The Royal New Zealand Navy ship Manawanui sinks off Upolu, Samoa, after running aground. (Post)
Alternative blurb: At least 12 people are injured as the Royal New Zealand Navy ship Manawanui sinks after grounding off Upolu, Samoa.
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Dumelow (talk · give credit)
Fairly unusual for commissioned navy vessels to sink, particularly Western vessels. This is the first RNZN vessel to sink since WWII. Article could use some updating. Will see what I can add - Dumelow (talk) 18:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've expanded it to a reasonably complete update - Dumelow (talk) 19:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We generally do not post military vessel accidents, since such are considered part of the duty. --Masem (t) 19:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Interested in seeing some discussion on this; I think such sinkings are rare enough (particularly in Western navies). We posted the accidental sinking of the Iranian navy's Kharg in 2021 - Dumelow (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Meaning no disrespect toward Her Majesty and no respect toward the Ayatollah, but IRIS Kharg had been around for longer, seeing more people and doing more things. Her loss was more "significant" for having spent those further 42 years abroad. Sometimes localized rarities just aren't rare enough. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Interested in seeing some discussion on this; I think such sinkings are rare enough (particularly in Western navies). We posted the accidental sinking of the Iranian navy's Kharg in 2021 - Dumelow (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose For the Royal New Zealand Navy, sure, not the most pleasant experience. But in terms of recent boat sinkings, count your blessings. Article isn't bad. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- There were more deaths, sure, but are you seriously comparing the sinking of a "locally made wooden boat", as described in your source, to a modern naval vessel? —Cryptic 22:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not in construction, maintenance and several other ways we can (and should) view an object. But as an event, yeah. Both seriously sunk in two newsworthy ways (and one we generally don't post). InedibleHulk (talk) 22:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- There were more deaths, sure, but are you seriously comparing the sinking of a "locally made wooden boat", as described in your source, to a modern naval vessel? —Cryptic 22:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No deaths, small ship, unimportant country (I didn't even know they had a military or a navy) Kasperquickly (talk) 22:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
October 5
October 5, 2024
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Sports
|
RD: Ifigenia Martínez y Hernández
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Proceso (in Spanish)
Credits:
- Nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Abcmaxx (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose article is teetering on a stub, and almost all the sources are primary sources. Scuba 20:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
October 4
October 4, 2024
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
RD: Michel Blanc
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Le Monde, The Guardian, BFMTV
Credits:
- Nominated by Mr. Lechkar (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Notable French actor. Mr. Lechkar (talk) 23:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
RD: Greg Landry
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NFL.com, NBC Sports, ABC News, AP News
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:9C21:B9C3:98B5:A380 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Cipherbug (talk · give credit) and Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Detroit Lions quarterback and Chicago Bears assistant coach. 240F:7A:6253:1:9C21:B9C3:98B5:A380 (talk) 12:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose article is orange tagged. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: Article is not in good shape. Orange tagged. High Admiral JMT (talk) 08:35, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose article is in bad need of citations. Scuba 21:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
RD: Billy Shaw
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NFL.com, ESPN, AP News
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:2D9A:96F4:D7E9:E994 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Hall of Fame Buffalo Bills guard. 240F:7A:6253:1:2D9A:96F4:D7E9:E994 (talk) 04:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait college section needs some work as it mainly consists of quotes, there is one cn tag and there is basically no indormation about his life between 1969 till 1999 and then from 1999 till his death. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support article looks good from a glance, no orange tags, no CNs that I could see. Scuba 16:02, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Multiple citation tags outstanding.—Bagumba (talk) 16:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Ongoing Removal: Sudanese civil war (2023–present)
Nominator's comments: Even if it's still ongoing, it dosen't receive as much coverage that it use to have. That article is also less updated then what it was. --Roncanada (talk) 22:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose still a major conflict and receiving news updates This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 22:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Every time we do this it reescalates within like 2 months. It's an on and off war, and its brutally horrific. It should be ongoing. Just because the West wont cover it doesn't mean that we shouldnt. Lukt64 (talk) 23:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- To play Devil's Advocate, notability in ITN is judged by amount of English-language reliable sources covering an event. If it's not being covered then that lessens notability, irrespective of how significant the story actually is. Though I do think we should keep this item up. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose there was just a major offensive in Khartoum like a few weeks ago. Scuba 00:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as one of the main editors of the page. The Russian invasion of Ukraine is also getting less coverage than it used to. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 17:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- oppose per previous arguments Abo Yemen✉ 12:05, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The list of ongoing armed conflicts lists six major wars, 15 wars and many lesser conflicts. By listing just a few of these in ITN's Ongoing, we give the impression that that's all there is. That's misleading and so it would be better to link to the list. That would provide a continuous gateway to all the numerous conflicts such as the Gang war in Haiti which is discussed below. Cherry-picking particular wars and incidents is not adequate as it thereby ignores all the others. And we don't have space to list everything. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- You opposed the nomination related to the Haitian gang war though? We have plenty of space, the main obstacle is regular updates and article quality. Abcmaxx (talk) 10:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Just 3 days ago there was an article in The Guardian about the El Fasher offensive, 2 weeks ago CNN article about the capital city battles, and Al Jazeera article about the resulting refugee crisis. Quite clearly ongoing and widely reported on, even given the difficulties reporting on this part of the world. Abcmaxx (talk) 10:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The ongoing line is meant for stories that are making headlines on a near daily basis, not simply because the event is ongoing. The Ukraine and the Israeli fronts clearly get those. While there are occasional stories from the Sudan civil war, its just too small scale in terms of coverage to be appropriate to maintain in the ongoing line. Masem (t) 12:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support only 50 edits since August, and nothing substantive. Stephen 13:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Due to various reasons, this particular conflict is not making that much news. It has only limited number of edits in the last two months when ongoing articles are expected to be updated nearly every day. I don't think timeline article is good enough to be posted on the main page as it seems to have turned into a news ticker. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I see well over 30 articles on the subject of the war in the last 24-48 hours (Searching for Sudan and Soudan...) Yesterday, AfricaNews wrote: "Fighting is expected to intensify as the rainy season draws to a close." (source) For some reason, neither the 29 Sept 2024 NYT article (§) on the UAE's "borrowing" of the Red Crescent symbol, nor the 2 October BBC article mentioning that NYT article have made it to the entry yet... -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 14:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Even if there are dozens of news stories of late about it, the lack of significant updates on a near-daily basis to our article itself means it's failing the quality aspect that would be expected for ongoing, and should be removed. But even with the bulk of those stories, the ones I see all fall into more routine coverage that doesn't describe any significant events that are part of it. Masem (t) 15:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now. Yes, the pace of editing has slowed a bit. But the article is still getting meaningful updates and sadly the war is continuing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- support per stephen. it is for events with regular updates, clearly it is lacking.Sportsnut24 (talk) 00:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: I disagree that an ongoing item needs to require regular updates, but then, as others have noted above, there certainly are things going on in this conflict, particularly if we look more widely than the front pages of western media. The war is important and the war is ongoing: therefore, it is a good candidate for an ongoing item. UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Bosnia and Herzegovina floods
Blurb: At least fifteen people die in floods and landslides in Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters, Al-Jazeera, N1Info, Associated Press
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Daß Wölf (talk · give credit)
Article sources count 14 dead in Jablanica and 1 in Fojnica. At least one place was apparently completely buried by debris (Donja Jablanica), so likely many more. The main road between Sarajevo and the Adriatic Sea is closed. Elections are also due this weekend. Daß Wölf 14:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Support on notability, oppose on quality as the article isn't there yet.15 confirmed less than 24 hours after the event happened is awfully high, and a village with its own article buried is what I'd considered newsworthy. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 14:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)- Any suggestions on what to improve? There's more info in the sources I used in the article, but I tried to stick with what's almost surely not going to be refuted. The catastrophe entered the news cycle only several hours earlier today. The people who found the dead in Jablanica are with the mountain rescue service, which probably started at sunrise.
- There should be more info by tomorrow, but I don't believe any of this is going to be struck out. Jablanica might or might not turn out to be the centre of the catastrophe. I'll add the government info from the N1 article; I only relied on BiH and Croatian sources up till now. Daß Wölf 14:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Some suggestions I have for improving the article's quality are to split it into sections and add an infobox. I suggest the article have at least sections for the lede, background, the flooding itself, the aftermath, reactions, and a see also section to similar disasters. As for the infobox, I suggest Template:Infobox flood. If you find any images, either free-to-use or fair use (mutually exclusive), use that as the image parameter. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 14:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- @GeorgeMemulous: Thanks, I've added an infobox. I'll organise it into sections if I find more time later today (but naturally, anybody is welcome). No objections beside the layout? Daß Wölf 15:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Beyond that, I'd say the article length is the other main concern, but I assume once it's split into the aforementioned sections that won't be much of a concern. Everything appears to be sourced. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 15:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- @GeorgeMemulous: Thanks, I've added an infobox. I'll organise it into sections if I find more time later today (but naturally, anybody is welcome). No objections beside the layout? Daß Wölf 15:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Some suggestions I have for improving the article's quality are to split it into sections and add an infobox. I suggest the article have at least sections for the lede, background, the flooding itself, the aftermath, reactions, and a see also section to similar disasters. As for the infobox, I suggest Template:Infobox flood. If you find any images, either free-to-use or fair use (mutually exclusive), use that as the image parameter. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 14:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait/Weak Oppose For now, still unclear on total casualties or economic impact. Kcmastrpc (talk) 15:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose article needs some work. Scuba 17:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- The page has been updated and given a typical section layout. Daß Wölf 13:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality seems fine, everything's cited, high national impact event. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article is of good enough quality and I don't think floods of this level are common in this country. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Kcmastrpc: Economic impact will be pretty high. Due to the enormous damage of the railway, the Federal Railways will suffer a daily loss of circa KM 280,000 (~€143,000) for at least a few months according to this source. The fact that part of the main road, M-17, between the capital Sarajevo and Mostar has suffered major damage as well (the two cities garnering a major amount of economic cash flow), will most definitely add to the financial loss. These are the most damaging floods since the ones in 2014 and this is an enormous deal as it was completely unexpected. Bakir123 (talk) 14:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted – Schwede66 19:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
October 3
October 3, 2024
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
|
RD: Pierre Christin
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Le Figaro, El Pais
Credits:
- Nominated by alexcalamaro (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
French comic author known per Valérian. Article not ready yet. Alexcalamaro (talk) 07:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
(Needs attention) 2024 Pont-Sondé attack
Blurb: An attack on the Haitian town of Pont-Sondé by a gang leaves at least 70 people dead and another 50 injured. (Post)
News source(s): BBC News, AP
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Breaking news around the world now, death and injury toll still only estimated at the moment. Only just started the article so help with expanding most welcome: need background, attack, response and aftermath sections ideally. Abcmaxx (talk) 06:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality Article is a stub and needs major expansion. Would support on significance due to the high number of deaths and injuries. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose currently Article is one paragraph, needs major expansion and if that happens I’ll change my vote to support. 27.96.223.193 (talk) 08:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Seems to be a routine incident for Haiti and so WP:NEWSEVENT applies. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose article is a stub. Scuba 14:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Stub, and this does “[seem] to be a routine incident”. 64.114 etc 15:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Andrew, Scuba and 64. 2604:3D08:9476:BE00:181F:B893:ADD2:6921 (talk)
- Also oppose per 2604. 2605:8D80:401:9041:BC0A:88E5:52B2:275 (talk) 15:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose article is a stub and is only around 150 words long, far too short for a blurb. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Update No longer a stub, thank you to those who expanded the article. As to those who say this is "routine" (if a town-wide gang attack can ever be that); the gang warfare centers around Port-au-Prince and Cap Haitien not remote smaller towns, this is definitely outside the norm. Abcmaxx (talk) 18:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sardonic comment: sorry, come back if a white person dies, otherwise not hittin' WP:MINIMUMDEATHS here. (Advice for those outside the Global North "wanting" to "make it onto" ITN: [1]) Hmm, Helene got deaths-blurbed when its tally hit the century mark—though to be fair it already was blurbed as a Major Storm. I wonder where the line is for that, maybe Category 3, the NHC's for "major hurricane" vs just "hurricane"? "Fun" thought exercise how many people would a Cat 2 storm have to kill in Haiti, to get on ITN, if it didn't affect anywhere else? (Stick a pin in this comment, for next weekish when then-likely-Trop Storm Kirk warp-5s over to W Europe, and how ITN reacts towards that, to contrast.) --Slowking Man (talk) 21:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait/Lean Support Article still need a bit more work, but given the causalities and based on the international reaction I'm leaning towards support. Kcmastrpc (talk) 19:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality per above - while not a stub, article is still far too short. Support on notability - even with the ongoing crisis, a gang shooting that kills upwards of 70 people is anything but "routine." The Kip (contribs) 19:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Event in the news, endorse (conditional on quality as usual). Bitter regretful observation: people might want to keep eye on (T·E·H·L·R) Haitian Civil War for if/when it gets turned to an article. --Slowking Man (talk) 21:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notability, I would have to agree with Slowking Man's and note the blasé attitudes towards this event by some individuals reflecting trends that have been documented among media portrayals of certain communities. Clearly a significant event. Ornithoptera (talk) 06:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Highlighting this particular incident still wouldn't give the big picture. The list of ongoing armed conflicts indicates that this is just a drop in the ocean. The gang wars in Mexico generate more deaths than the gangs in Haiti and then there are other major wars too. If you want to right great wrongs, then you have your work cut out for you. Our job as an encyclopedia is to summarise all this, not to dwell on the detail. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- The larger issue is that WP is not a newspaper, and not every single event needs an article or a separate article. This specific event looks like part of the ongoing violence in Haiti and while it was noted in the day-to-day media, likely will not have any substantive difference from all the other violence in Haiti that necessitates a separate article, much less being ITN. Masem (t) 13:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think here is a larger point some of us are kind of working towards: Okay, now, take a view like those expressed in the replies preceding mine, and apply to other subjects and kinds of events. Do we really need to mention every cyclone that kills a bunch of people and give it its own article? What about floods in Europe or China or India or insert place here? Heat waves? Storms happen, people die, big deal, people die all the time. Put it in some kinda "storms in $YEAR" article. ("Don't let $PERSON's death get you down. People die all the time. Why, you could wake up dead tomorrow. ...Well. goodnight!") Philosophical/rhetorical query: What is it that makes "big storms and their effects" more intrinsically ITN-worthy vs "humans directly killing other humans in $PLACE"?
- Fun exercise: reflect on this given that us cranking up our planet's temperature is inevitably going to lead to much more of this stuff. What's gonna be the response when three/four-digit death tolls from cyclones become a routine annual event? (Excerpts from Future Wikipedia: "The 2039 tropical storm death season begins in the Northern Hemisphere. Wikipedia reminds those located below 40 degrees north to review their disaster and evacuation planning, stay informed, and promptly follow instructions from relevant authorities.") Not to mention all the inevitable mass migration/conflict/wars likely to result. (More excerpts: "Ongoing events: Current sub-temperate territorial conflicts") Ooh, nice informative & relevant map: pop. density/latitude. --Slowking Man (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC) (Phrase of the day: "shifting baselines" --Slowking Man (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC))
- Replying to own comment to note that "floods in part of Europe" has been apparently just posted to ITN. (Bonus points: from a non-English-as-first-lang part!) Compare-and-contrast current death toll. More data points for calibration of WP:MINIMUMDEATHS? ("Storms and floods happen, people die...") --Slowking Man (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The flood stub and this stub are about the same size (by any name). I didn't think the flood one would make it. Now that it has and with this event rarer and deadlier, holding it down would definitely appear to suggest what it looks like about our standards and practices. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- InedibleHulk, you would know (or at least should know) that we do not post stubs. The 2024 Bosnia and Herzegovina floods article wasn't a stub (any longer) when I posted it. Neither is this article a stub any longer. Whilst those assessments are not an exact science, I note that they no longer have stub tags, and on the talk pages, they are both rated start class; I agree with those ratings. Hence, the basic premise from which you start your argument (if we post the other stub, we might as well post this stub, too) is wrong.
- Blurbs get posted when there is at least rough consensus to do so. To my mind, this article is good enough now. It cannot get posted, though, because that's not what the consensus says. There are many comments above that the topic is notable but the article (at the time of voting) was a stub. That's now changed, but editors need to say so. Schwede66 03:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- I thought adding "(by any name)" would be enough (sorry). Whatever we call this short article or that brief overview, you posted the latter after two supports. Given the expansion and de facto "Wait !votes", I now count more than two supportive of publicizing this attack (including your own) and know some admins who'd rightly discount a few of those opposes as poor arguments; if any of them are watching, I suggest posting sooner than later. InedibleHulk (talk) 17:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Needs attention If those who opposed on quality can please have a look again if the current quality is enough now to change your votes given the article has been majorly expanded. Abcmaxx (talk) 19:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Abcmaxx: Am I to understand your prior Update and Needs attention emboldenings as support in itself? If so, I think you'll need to embolden the word "Support" for it to technically count toward "consensus". At least that's what I've gathered from
editors need to say so
. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)- I'm the nominator though. Abcmaxx (talk) 21:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Good point, my bad; @PrinceofPunjab: You're not, are you? InedibleHulk (talk) 21:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Scu ba: I missed your name in the SEAOFNUMBERS; would you care to start again? InedibleHulk (talk) 21:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @TDKR Chicago 101: I have no idea how I missed you starting first, but that's no excuse; have things changed? InedibleHulk (talk) 21:45, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm the nominator though. Abcmaxx (talk) 21:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Abcmaxx: Am I to understand your prior Update and Needs attention emboldenings as support in itself? If so, I think you'll need to embolden the word "Support" for it to technically count toward "consensus". At least that's what I've gathered from
Typhoon Krathon
Blurb: Typhoon Krathon leaves at least 18 people dead in the Philippines and Taiwan. (Post)
News source(s): Barrons, Inquirer, France 24, AP News
Credits:
- Nominated by HurricaneEdgar (talk · give credit)
The storm death toll has risen to 18, and the articles are in good shape. HurricaneEdgar 19:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Looking at the scope of deaths, inuries and damages, this doesn't seem like as significant storm compared to other major typhoons. -Masem (t) 19:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support article is in good shape, and the Typhoon has made landfall and caused significant casualties which checks both boxes for ITN inclusion in my book Scuba 20:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:NEWSEVENT. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: article looks good, and the event is notable. I don't see that NEWSEVENT is an issue here: major storms which cause significant loss of life generally meet GNG, and that guideline has Events are also very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources: that seems to be met here. UndercoverClassicist T·C 21:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Very notable disaster. Though death toll not significant, the destruction is. High Admiral JMT (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, not significant, low casualties, low damage, spent most of it's time over the sea. Stephen 04:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Stephen. The Kip (contribs) 19:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose has Low damages and casualties. TyphoonAmpil [citation needed] 04:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: This typhoon has broken the observation record in Taiwan according to the local news.[2][3][4]--Sinsyuan✍️🌏🚀 06:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Blurb: The United Kingdom agrees to cede sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius (Post)
Alternative blurb: The United Kingdom agrees to cede sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius
Alternative blurb II: The United Kingdom agrees to cede sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius in exchange for the territory being leased back to the UK for the initial period of 99 years.
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Chipmunkdavis (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Ornithoptera (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
CMD (talk) 10:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait for Significance and Oppose on Quality "The deal is still subject to finalisation of a treaty but both sides have vowed to complete this as quickly as possible." Now, I know times move faster than they did when some natives treated and vowed with the Crown. But still, even if it doesn't take centuries this time, it could be months or years before anything comes of this. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Agree the transfer itself would be newsworthy, but I nominated feeling the reaching of an agreement was significant in its own right. It follows about a decade of concerted diplomatic efforts by Mauritius. The ceding of territory is a rare enough event. The last was probably the 2016 agreement for Egypt to transfer two islands to Saudi Arabia? CMD (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I hear you. As you say, though, this next step follows about a decade. The ceding itself will happen if it happens, and that's final (to me). InedibleHulk (talk) 11:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Agree the transfer itself would be newsworthy, but I nominated feeling the reaching of an agreement was significant in its own right. It follows about a decade of concerted diplomatic efforts by Mauritius. The ceding of territory is a rare enough event. The last was probably the 2016 agreement for Egypt to transfer two islands to Saudi Arabia? CMD (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Major power is ceding a large part of its territory to another country, very big news. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 11:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: This is quite a surprising move from Britain after blocking the transfer of sovereignty for so long, however there are some details that need clarification such as when will the transfer come into effect. Tofusaurus (talk) 11:23, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait or at least alter "agrees" to "offers". This will only happen if Mauritius agrees to a treaty that allows the status quo indefinitely, more or less, on Diego Garcia. That may be objectionable to Mauritius, and they may refuse to sign off.--Wehwalt (talk) 11:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- For what it's worth this was reportedly a joint statement also issued by the Mauritian PM, they're presumably as on-board as the UK. CMD (talk) 14:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- (Based on the report) this wasn't a unilateral offer by the UK. It's the high level agreement after negotiation with the agreement of all parties (UK, Mauritius & USA). The 99 years lease would had been agreed to as a term by Mauritius. -- KTC (talk) 17:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait and Support: Definitely major. However, plans have not yet been finalized. High Admiral JMT (talk) 12:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- The updates to the article were reverted; the only remaining relevant change is the removal of a statement that negotiations were halted in December 2023. We can't possibly post this until that's resolved. —Cryptic 13:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- There's a piece in the lead now (as of 13:45); not sure if that counts. InedibleHulk (talk) 13:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support This is a textbook example of a notable story of high encyclopaedic value.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support on significance This is a major change to the map. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 13:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support a major international news and is blurbworthy and should be posted when articles are updated. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support once fully cited: not sure we need to wait for it to actually happen; the decision is noteworthy enough. UndercoverClassicist T·C 14:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now due to quality issues with the article and lack of significant updates to it, but I do Support on significance once those are resolved ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 14:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support once citation issues are cleared up Kcmastrpc (talk) 14:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support resolution of a long-standing diplomatic issue, proposing ALT blurb to link to the Chagos Archipelago sovereignty dispute. Ornithoptera (talk) 17:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I’d rather wait until the treaty is finalized. Since there seems to be a lot of support for posting this, I’d prefer the alt blurb if this is posted. I’d say that highlighting the Chagos Archipelago sovereignty dispute would be the most important aspect of a blurb. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 18:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty historic momement for the people of those islands and it's also a notable international news story in general. GWA88 (talk) 18:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – I would say "to return sovereignty ..." STSC (talk) 18:05, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Mauritius was never sovereign when they administered Chagos Scuba 19:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Would "transfer sovereignty" be a more neutral wording? Ornithoptera (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm fine with "ceding sovereignty" because that's what most publications are saying. Scuba 19:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Would "transfer sovereignty" be a more neutral wording? Ornithoptera (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Mauritius was never sovereign when they administered Chagos Scuba 19:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support goodbye British Indian Ocean Territory, one of the few remaining English colonies. Scuba 19:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- There are no English colonies remaining, England as an independent polity was dissolved in 1707. The Indian Ocean Territory is also classified as a territory rather than a colony (the legal status of 'colony' was dissolved in 1982). PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome, saying it "totally isn't a colony" doesn't magically make it stop being a colony. Also the Scottish Welsh and Irish weren't the ones making the colonies, the English where. Scuba 19:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Y Wladfa and Darien scheme might make for interesting reading; and plenty of Scots (especially) were involved in British colonial projects after the union. None of which is to deny the poor treatment of the Scots, Irish, and Welsh by the English within the Union - but do get your facts right. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yup you're so right, the sole Scottish colony (that failed), and an group of welsh immigrants are totally the same as to what the English did around the world. Scuba 16:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't an accurate assessment of British colonial history. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Y Wladfa and Darien scheme might make for interesting reading; and plenty of Scots (especially) were involved in British colonial projects after the union. None of which is to deny the poor treatment of the Scots, Irish, and Welsh by the English within the Union - but do get your facts right. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome, saying it "totally isn't a colony" doesn't magically make it stop being a colony. Also the Scottish Welsh and Irish weren't the ones making the colonies, the English where. Scuba 19:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- There are no English colonies remaining, England as an independent polity was dissolved in 1707. The Indian Ocean Territory is also classified as a territory rather than a colony (the legal status of 'colony' was dissolved in 1982). PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support on significance but wait until the orange tag on the target article is fixed. Ollieisanerd (talk • contribs) 20:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very significant news, but best to wait until all plans are finalised per above. Editor 5426387 (talk) 23:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support noting the ceding of a remnant of the Old Empire. SerialNumber54129 23:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Tentative support but Wait until it is fully agreed upon and completed. --Masem (t) 00:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- oppose this is pure fluff, nothing changes. Formal sovereignty replaced with a 99-year-long lease. Does anyone really expect we'd still have nation states with borders like the uk, the mauritus or indeed the US (that is the actual primary user of that military base which is at the source of whole dispute) come 2123? lol. Kasperquickly (talk) 06:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- The 99-year lease applies to the base on Diego Garcia; the transfer of sovereignty applies to the entire territory, and Mauritius has indicated that they'd support resettling Chagossians on the other islands of the archipelago. And the rest of your comment convinces me that you are not bringing a serious understanding of international relations to bear here. GenevieveDEon (talk) 11:22, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support on significance as this is a pretty big moment in decolonisation of the UK's remaining territories. Article still needs work though. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait and support once the treaty is fully finalized. Major significance, new change in the map. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support on significance but wait both for better article quality, or potentially even an article on the transfer itself. –DMartin 15:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- support it already mauritius sovereignty now. obviously administrative change will not happen so quick, but legally done.Sportsnut24 (talk) 15:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment ALT2 is incorrect, and implies that the UK retains control of the entirety of the Archipelago rather than the lease on Diego Garcia. Ornithoptera (talk) 18:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Significant moment geopolitically. Lean waiting until the treaty is formalized, however. The Kip (contribs) 20:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding quality issues raised above, the History section has been changed significantly, and I believe the yellow tag is no longer applicable. CMD (talk) 06:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - I don't agree to the wording "to cede sovereignty" in the blurbs. It implies that the UK was the rightful owner and they were forced to do so. Many sources including BBC use the words "hand over". STSC (talk) 07:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- These seem functionally synonymous. "cede" means to give up, it doesn't imply legitimacy either way. At any rate, the UK was effectively forced to turn over the territory, so that implication if read is accurate. CMD (talk) 09:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree, you don't have to be forced to cede something. Scuba 16:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait as per WP:TOOSOON. The treaty hasn't been signed or ratified yet. The UK could still pull out and retain the BIOT. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
October 2
October 2, 2024
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Sports
|
RD: Christopher Charles Benninger
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Indian Express
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:E8D8:9FD9:8A77:E4D6 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Tatiraju.rishabh (talk · give credit) and Strattonsmith (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
American-born Indian architect. 240F:7A:6253:1:E8D8:9FD9:8A77:E4D6 (talk) 15:26, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose there is an orange COI and NPOV tag. The early life section have no information about the subject's early life. Sourcing is not great as some of the sources are dead, primary or have no information about the subject. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Complete brain mapping of fruit fly
Blurb: Scientists complete a full brain map of the common fruit fly. (Post)
News source(s): New York Times, The Guardian, Nature (peer reviewed paper)
Credits:
- Nominated by Masem (talk · give credit)
- Created by Iwaterpolo (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Bremps (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Best likely article to include this but currently lacks this update. Masem (t) 17:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
*Strong oppose on quality - article hasn't been updated at all since May 2024. A timeline article, or an article about this specific brainmap would be best here, but to my knowledge none exists. Not sure as to notability, but leaning weak support. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 18:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC) Quality issues are more or less resolved, overall support. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 11:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- I plan to do the update if it is not done in the next 12 to 24 hr. On mobile so can't do an effective job of it until on real keyboard. Masem (t) 18:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Expansion is done. I think there are free use images based on the papers, but have to try to figure out best source to work from . --Masem (t) 05:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- I plan to do the update if it is not done in the next 12 to 24 hr. On mobile so can't do an effective job of it until on real keyboard. Masem (t) 18:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose belongs in a DYK not an ITN. Scuba 20:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- It is not eligible for DYK, it is not at GA within the past 7 days, nor expanded 5x, or new enough. Ornithoptera (talk) 20:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support It's in the news and seems quite significant. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support on notability, oppose on quality. Noting that the main article is not eligible for DYK, although the possibility of creating a new standalone article (either for ITN or DYK) could be considered. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:47, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose – Fascinating subject, but I think our article doesn't quite represent it in a way that's worth featuring. I appreciate the singular new paragraph, but it doesn't really feel like enough. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 16:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: In the news and interesting. C F A 💬 22:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
RD: Susie Berning
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): USGA.org, ESPN, AP News
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:F8A2:3A7B:85FC:16AA (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Mohamad Darilin (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
American Hall of Fame professional golfer. 240F:7A:6253:1:F8A2:3A7B:85FC:16AA (talk) 02:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not ready: mostly uncited. Would support once fixed. UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose article has only three sources. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
October 1
October 1, 2024
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Politics and elections
|
Mark Rutte installed as Secretary General of NATO
Blurb: Former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte (pictured) is installed as the Secretary General of NATO, succeeding Jens Stoltenberg (Post)
Alternative blurb: Mark Rutte (pictured) succeeds Jens Stoltenberg as Secretary General of NATO
News source(s): Associated Press
Credits:
- Nominated by Anomynous (talk · give credit)
- Updated by WikiGuff (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Weak support Neither ITNR nor a national leader, but certainly an extremely influential position, and Stoltenberg had been SG for a decade. The Kip (contribs) 00:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Although not a national leader, the Secretary General of NATO is still an important and influential position. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Good Candidate, Per nom. TyphoonAmpil [citation needed] 03:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support(?) Nato Secretary General falls into a grey-area for ITN/R, but I think(?) we included Ursula von der Leyen being re-elected EU Commission president, so we should include Rutte too. Scuba 04:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: The position of NATO Secretary General is pretty important, according to me. High Admiral JMT (talk) 07:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The article is orange-tagged and the position seems a rather bland, bureaucratic one. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, the Secretary General of NATO is a bland and bureaucratic role? Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's right. The article makes it fairly clear that this is a civil service position -- one of facilitation rather than making military or political decisions. Those rest with the member countries. For example, there's currently a crisis in the Middle East with many missiles flying around. Does NATO have a position or part in this? It appears that various members are involved in various ways such as shooting down the missiles but NATO and its bureaucracy don't seem to be significant players. Even in Ukraine, which is closer to home, it doesn't seem that NATO has been as significant as the actions of individual members seem to have been taken on a national and separate basis. Even the EU seems to have been more coherent there. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, the Secretary General of NATO is a bland and bureaucratic role? Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality the main article is orange tagged with multiple cn tags. But, when those have been resolved, I will support the blurb. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support once fully cited: I might have a go at adding some. UndercoverClassicist T·C 17:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notability as the NATO Secretary General seems like an important role, as the leader of the largest military alliance in the world. Oppose on quality as there is still an orange tag and 15 CN tags too. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1(The Garage) 20:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support on significance Once citation issues are resolved. Arguably a role more significant than many national leadership changes we post. AusLondonder (talk) 20:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Theoretically support since NATO’s Secretary-General is an important position, but oppose for now due to quality issues. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 03:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment When or if NATO goes to war, he'll be subservient to the non-secretarial generals in his ranks. That's not to diminish his perceived power right now, mind you. I'm led to believe it's quite substantial. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:11, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality Rutte's article needs some ref work. Once fixed, I'd support posting especially given how NATO's presence has been more talked about in the news in recent news. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:12, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on significance. Principally a secretarial position, appointed, which is serving as the head of a steering committee (albeit an important one). Kcmastrpc (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose — Not even ITNR, who cares about the head or tail of NATO. STSC (talk) 18:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Probably the 32 member nations of NATO which contribute ~55% of global military funding and 45.65% of the global GDP. Scuba 20:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I visited the International Maritime Organization recently. This has 176 members which represent most of the world. It's responsible for the world's shipping and so quite important for vital commerce and trade. It has a Secretary-General too – Arsenio Dominguez – and he was appointed earlier this year. There are lots of international agencies like this with lots of staff and so forth. But are their staff changes significant or not? You can't really tell until they have been in post for a while and so determine whether they have made a difference. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Probably the 32 member nations of NATO which contribute ~55% of global military funding and 45.65% of the global GDP. Scuba 20:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are many other alliances and supranational organisations in the world, so it's really unnecessary to single out NATO and give it more importance. Furthermore, this position is largely ceremonial as this person doesn't wield any significant power. The decisions whether the United States or Turkey will go to wars are simply made by their presidents.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality, support once improved on notability article needs some work. I honestly don't know where those editors have been hiding for the past thirty years (or two) who doubt NATO's stature and the importance of what NATO's top leader does and says. _-_Alsor (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Over the past thirty years, several major NATO members have been at war (one its longest). That mostly stopped while Stoltenberg was attending meetings, issuing memoranda and all that high and mighty hidden stuff. In peacetime, it's the many other industry bigwigs whose technically unsexy jobs "really" matter. InedibleHulk (talk) 17:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- It might also help you understand others' apathy to wonder whether his two "big" vows (to work against Russian aggression and with the American president) are things NATO already routinely does. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not Ready for the usual reason. Support on significance. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
US port strike
Blurb: Dockworkers strike at East and Gulf Coast ports in the United States (Post)
Alternative blurb: 45,000 ILA dockworkers go on strike at East Coast and Gulf Coast ports in the United States.
Alternative blurb II: 45,000 dockworkers of the International Longshoremen's Association strike across United States Gulf and East Coast ports.
Alternative blurb III: The ILA and USMX negotiate to suspend a three-day labour strike at US Gulf and East Coast ports by over 45,000 dockworkers.
News source(s): (initial CNBC report), (post-strike Reuters report)
Credits:
- Nominated by Interstellarity (talk · give credit)
This may impact supply and inflation and is newsworthy. Interstellarity (talk) 21:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - this may not last long. And hasn't exactly been getting anything other than local reporting. What other strikes have we ITN'ed? I'd have thought it would have had to be more of a general strike, or something unusual like the 1981 US Air Traffic Controllers strike, when they simply fired all the strikers. If we ITNed all similar strikes, we'd have a few a month just for France! :) Nfitz (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment US East Coast / Gulf ports process close to half of the value of imports coming into the USA, and if I'm not mistaken, the US is the biggest importer on the planet. Also, I believe we blurbed the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike which was entertainment workers, not people who oversaw trade. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike was blurbed in July 2023: see the posted blurb page. There was also coincidentally a blurb for a large-scale strike in France earlier that month. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Purely by the numbers, a French strike does not have the same economic impact as one that impacts the entire East and Gulf Coast ports, which as noted process about half of all imports/exports. IF this lasts long (more than a few days), it could be one of the largest strikes in decades. Wqwt (talk) 22:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- If this lasts long, then it can be reposted. Obviously strikes in bigger countries have bigger local impacts. That doesn't make it ITN. Surely the relative impact of the Canadian rail strike (which shut down virtually the entire rail network) was bigger - but not even nominated. Nfitz (talk) 16:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The Canadian rail strike was nominated. It was mainly opposed due to article quality issues & also b/c the strike ended too quickly. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 18:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- If this lasts long, then it can be reposted. Obviously strikes in bigger countries have bigger local impacts. That doesn't make it ITN. Surely the relative impact of the Canadian rail strike (which shut down virtually the entire rail network) was bigger - but not even nominated. Nfitz (talk) 16:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – From the Impact section of the article, we can see the massive effects this strike has. First strike of this sort in nearly fifty years. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 21:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- There have been many, many, dockworkers strikes. It isn't even the first one this week - Montreal. The only difference is the rest of us don't rush here as fast as we can for local news. Nfitz (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Wait for a while to see if this is resolved very quickly (i.e. under 24 hours), but otherwise strong support. (argument moved below). GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Wait/WeakSupport If this goes longer than 72h then the impact could be rather severe. Kcmastrpc (talk) 21:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It looks like there isn't going to be a resolution to this anytime soon and the fact this story has dropped off the front pages of many MSM outlets has me suspicious. Blurb it! Kcmastrpc (talk) 14:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Wait/support per Kcmastrpc and George.The Kip (contribs) 00:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose now that the strike has ended. The Kip (contribs) 20:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hold for now, suggest 48h as the threshold for a revisit This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 00:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait for at least 48/72 hr to see how this develops and how the wind blows in terms of negotiations to end it. The Impact section should likely be expanded to explain better about how much cargo goes through the eastern ports relative to other ports (known factors), as that will help put the dollar figures mentioned in better perspective. --Masem (t) 01:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Significant event that could have an important impact on the US economy and the US election. Tradediatalk 04:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Those of you who support are relying on conjecture and forecasts. Here we cannot rely on crystal balls: we must wait for a global and noticeable economic impact. For now it is something sectorial, local and exclusively newsworthy and Wikipedia is not a news portal. _-_Alsor (talk) 09:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- An issue with a case like this is that the onset of the strike will be covered by the news, but that when the impacts start to actually occur, it will be a trickle of news and very difficult to set a point where it could be then considered "in the news". We obviously don't want to rush but here's a case where there's multiple high quality sources expressing very likely results should the strike persist, so it makes sense to post at this stage (but as noted above, after being sure the strike isn't likely to resolve quickly). — Masem (t) 12:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Soft Support politically relevant, and the only glaring issues is that it needs more content in some sections. Scuba 20:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Support altblurb:45,000 ILA dockworkers go on strike at East Coast and Gulf Coast ports in the United States.
It's been over 24 hours since the strike commenced and a quick search for "when will the port strike end" gives no indication it will be an affair that will be resolved quickly. CNBC estimates a weeklong strike at East Coast / Gulf ports could cause up to 3.6 billion in economic loss, and compare that to 6.5 billion over a full 105 days for the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike, which was also blurbed. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)- Maybe I’m just being pedantic but I think “…dockworkers strike at…” is more correct than “go on strike”. –DMartin 03:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Changing my vote to Strong support per Reuters: No negotiations to end the strike are scheduled, and Joe Biden, the US president, is putting his support behind the ILA. This may truly be a long one. Also, as per economic loss, JP Morgan now estimates the strike could cost the nation up to $5 billion USD a day, significantly above the initial CNBC estimate of 3.7 billion in one week. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)- Altblurb 2 proposed, per @User:dmartin969's suggestion. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not surprising that he'd put his support behind them; it's a month to go before the general election, and the last thing he wants is to lose the sizable union demographic on failing to take a stance with a story like this. For that reason, I do not believe his support makes the strike inherently more significant. Duly signed, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 13:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- My stance is is that this is as opposed to no stance or an anti-union one taken by the president, had this happened last year. The president's stance is a not insignificant argument that this strike will go longer, whether or not it was done for political advantage. Besides, it's not going in the blurb. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait then Support - If this continues over an extended period of time then this will be one of the most significant strikes in the last few years. Already all over the news PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is very likely to have a significant effect on not just the US economy, but the global economy. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 04:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - This will likely be significant and companies are known for their greed, there is a very high chance that the protests last longer than 3 days and start affecting the global supply chain. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 05:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - This is a big one, comparable to the air traffic controller's strikes in the 70s and 80s, which also had similarly broad impacts. Duly signed, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 13:32, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - It's been 48 hours and the situation hasn't yet been resolved. The United States is the world's biggest economy and this strike affects the whole Eastern US. This will surely have a large impact. -insert valid name here- (talk) 17:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Becoming a big issue maybe even causing riots if it's seriously disrupting the supply chain. STSC (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- SupportMajor industrial unrest becoming social unrest. Remember, people: The class struggle is a political struggle. SerialNumber54129 22:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Word is that the negotiations have worked and the strike will be over by Friday [5] Masem (t) 22:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- And now confirmed. [6] — Masem (t) 03:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The strike didn’t last long enough to necessitate a blurb. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Strike put on hold so this doesn't need a blurb. Noah, BSBATalk 04:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post-strike support - significant economical damage has already occurred, markets worldwide already fell, and regardless, this was the biggest US strike action since 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike (which we blurbed in 2023), and if the JP Morgan estimates are confirmed, would have caused twice as much economic damage as that (see Reuters source for more). Altblurb 3 proposed. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 12:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post-Altblurb 3 Proposal Oppose Strike news is only news during a strike and markets were designed to fluctuate. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The strike has ended and I don't think we should post about an ended strike that lasted just few days. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
RD: John Amos
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP News
Credits:
- Nominated by Staraction (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Rusted AutoParts (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Amos passed 21 August 2024; it was announced 1 October 2024. Staraction (talk | contribs) 19:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose large chunks of article are uncited. Scuba 20:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. I am shocked to see that they didn't let public know before 40 days passed. BilboBeggins (talk) 21:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not Ready Referencing is extremely poor. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose orange tagged and many cn tags. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Iran strikes Israel
Blurb: Iran launches strikes against Israel following Israel's ground invasion of Lebanon. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Iran launches a missile attack against Israel.
Alternative blurb II: Iran launches a missile attack against Israel in retaliation for the assassinations of Hezbollah and Hamas leaders Hassan Nasrallah and Ismail Haniyeh, and of Iranian general Abbas Nilforoushan.
News source(s): WaPo CNN
Credits:
- Nominated by RockinJack18 (talk · give credit)
Early, but could have crucial consequences in the conflict - RockinJack18 17:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Altblurb1 until Iran's attack is directly connected to the invasion of Lebanon. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 17:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm sure this was just a spur of the moment thing. Scuba 02:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait - not much is known yet about the scale, impact, etc. Fog of war is still very much in effect. The Kip (contribs) 17:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm satisfied with the combined blurb. The Kip (contribs) 00:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Thousands of missiles launched simultaneously, with many dozens of missies making it through the Iron Dome and causing massive damage. Count Iblis (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Do we have sources for thousands of missiles launched, with dozens causing massive damage? It was hundreds and a handful with no indications of the degree of damage when I was looking. But at the same time, surely this is why we should Wait. Nfitz (talk) 17:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait we don't the scale or the impact of these missiles, let the dust settle a little. Also, currently the article coinsists mostly of the background information and has no information about the strikes itself. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's been widely reported that this is in response to Israel's actions against Hezbollah which could be covered under the ongoing item for Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present) RachelTensions (talk) 17:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. This was a major, highly newsworthy attack that is important enough to have its own entry. Jerdle (talk) 18:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait We don't know enough at this point. However, if this results in a major direct military conflict between Iran and Israel, I suspect some kind of blurb will be justified. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - I know it's tempting to bundle together the crazy events in the last 2 days but I think this is a notable development on its own. A nuclear-armed state has been directly bombarded by a foreign nation. Tel Aviv and Jerusalem have had hundreds of missile strikes, the entire country is in lockdown, by far the biggest confrontation between Israel and Iran ever. This will have major ramifications for the future of the conflict. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I feel there's significant exaggeration in your statement User:PrecariousWorlds. It's not the "biggest confrontation between Israel and Iran ever". With less than 200 missiles fired, it's not even the biggest confrontation this year - as there was over 300 in April 2024. Also, with less than 200 missiles fired, what sourcing are you using for the "hundreds of missile strikes"? Surely the majority of the missiles were shot down, and didn't strike. Can you provide some kind of back-up for your comment, or edit it? Thanks, Nfitz (talk) 20:37, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- US Major general Pat Ryder says the attack was at least twice as big as in April ( ). Most were intercepted but many struck and caused significant damage in suburbs and in military bases. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your words are hundreds. Clearly Ryder is full of it, according to Israeli and Iranian claims. Nfitz (talk) 16:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- US Major general Pat Ryder says the attack was at least twice as big as in April ( ). Most were intercepted but many struck and caused significant damage in suburbs and in military bases. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- I feel there's significant exaggeration in your statement User:PrecariousWorlds. It's not the "biggest confrontation between Israel and Iran ever". With less than 200 missiles fired, it's not even the biggest confrontation this year - as there was over 300 in April 2024. Also, with less than 200 missiles fired, what sourcing are you using for the "hundreds of missile strikes"? Surely the majority of the missiles were shot down, and didn't strike. Can you provide some kind of back-up for your comment, or edit it? Thanks, Nfitz (talk) 20:37, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait/Oppose until we see if this has wider ramifications. Iran launched missiles at Israel just this year, in April, as a response to Israel killing five members of Iran’s revolutionary guards, but there was no larger effects. The middle east is a powder keg right now, and we should not be posting every salvo that occurs between all these nations. Natg 19 (talk) 18:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. a whole country waiting for missiles coming from +1000miles away to fall on its head, in what might spark a (choose your superlative / descriptor) war, is important enough. TaBaZzz (talk) 18:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is a big breaking news live coverage on every major news network around the world. It should be "Alternative blurb" because blurb is original research that is probably wrong. Tradediatalk 19:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Covered in ongoing. Kcmastrpc (talk) 19:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support altblurb. We shouldn't try to read tea leaves about why Iran did this, nor should be broadcast their explanations. The article will cover all that. What's important to cover in the blurb is what happened. Hundreds of ballistic missiles were fired. Add casualty figures if there were any, as they become available, because we customarily include them. Jehochman Talk 19:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- comment reports say most of the missiles were shot down, and the few that landed did little damage with maybe perhaps one casualty. This would make this similar to the previous missile strike this year. It is probably better to try to keep it to one facet of this conflict, being the lebanon invasion. Masem (t) 19:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support original blurb unless there is a separate posting for the Lebanon invasion. Two for one. Bitspectator ⛩️ 19:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is the consensus that this nomination and the below nomination regarding the Israel invasion of Lebanon from September 30th are mutually exclusive? On the one hand, the two events are directly connected and closely related, so it seems logical to group them in a blurb. But on the other hand, this attack by Iran has been in the works for a while - is it an oversimplification to imply causation by saying "After Israel does x, Iran does y"? In any event, support some blurb being posted. The admin who reviews this probably should assess and decide on the nomination for the invasion at the same time. FlipandFlopped ツ 19:45, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support the original blurb here with both launches strikesand Israel's ground invasion of Lebanon to be bolded. We can use one blurb to document two very related events.VR (Please ping on reply) 19:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Vice regent Not true, the IRGC said it was for the assassinations Personisinsterest (talk) 22:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose covered by ongoing.
- Noah, BSBATalk 19:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Observation 1: No one (of the general reader public, to a first approximation) notices/sees the "ongoing" items down there. See banner blindness. Might as well just remove the individual entries, just retain the "Ongoing events" link, enlarge text size a bit. Move all the "here are various Major Global Events" stuff to the top of that page. There, frees up space in the already crowded ITN box (this helps in making individual items stand out more). (Wikimedia really needs to hire a professional UI designer. The Right Thing to do would be for them to make suggestions on improvements, and work on things requested by the projects.)
- Observation 2: Assume waaaaay less general background & world events knowledge of a general audience (the audience Wikipedia is supposed to be written towards). Lowest common denominator. What % of the total English-as-a-first-language population do you estimate would be able to without looking up anything, correctly answer: Name a country that Hezbollah has something to do with? Which countries are immediately adjacent to Israel? Okay now do total world English speakers. Those things being necessary prerequisite knowledge, to know that for some kind of News related to "Israel" "Iran" "Lebanon", you might want to go looking under "Israel—Hezbollah war". --Slowking Man (talk) 20:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- on the ·second point, we don't assume readers are dumb as rocks and there is some degree of WP:CIR for readers, it's why we normally do not link country or major city names unless we are specifically talking about that as a geographic place, because we assume that readers have a decent knowledge of world geography. Masem (t) 20:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- To be fair, it's hard to keep track of axis of the three H-terrorist groups, and what they currently occupy, for a casual reader. I think a simple "Israeli wars" or "Fighting in the Middle East" might cover it better. Nfitz (talk) 20:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have some possibly bad news for you about the median level of geography knowledge of the general public. (Yes that's the right link though the website might look unexpected, they apparently commissioned the survey.) Hmm wonder what kind of results you'd get from a survey of one of the top 5 countries here after the US (the total # of which are in Europe: 0) Slowking Man (talk) 01:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC) (Clarifying addendum: top 5 by total # of en speakers --Slowking Man (talk) 04:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC))
- on the ·second point, we don't assume readers are dumb as rocks and there is some degree of WP:CIR for readers, it's why we normally do not link country or major city names unless we are specifically talking about that as a geographic place, because we assume that readers have a decent knowledge of world geography. Masem (t) 20:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted I've written a combined blurb with the 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, but phrased so that we don't imply that Iran attacked because of the Lebanon invasion. The blurb I've removed was the 2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike, partly so that we don't overload ITN with middle eastern affairs, and partly because Maggie Smith was posted later than the blurbs above. Schwede66 22:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post posting Support - a case of dog bites man, relative to recent news relating to Israel. SerialNumber54129 22:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Thai school bus crash
Blurb: Twenty schoolchildren and three others are killed in a bus crash (pictured) in Pathum Thani, Thailand (Post)
Alternative blurb: A school bus crashes (pictured) in Pathum Thani, Thailand, leaving 20 school children and 3 others dead
News source(s): Reuters, BBC, Bangkok Post
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Chainwit. (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Bloxzge 025 (talk · give credit) and Miwako Sato (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Bus carrying school children crashes and catches fire in Thailand, leaving 20 children and 3 other dead. Significant both in term of number of fatalities and that of the fact that most of which are children. PS Feel free to edit the blurb as appropriate. I'm not sure about its writing style. --Chainwit. (talk) 16:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Correct me if I'm wrong, but is that image AI generated? See the hose on the right disappearing and the nearly unintelligible Mercedes-Benz written in English. That, or this image was taken at a low resolution and upscaled, keeping the sparse details. Either way, I don't believe this image is a good fit for ITN. Neutral on the blurb, seems to be a relatively major safety incident more than it is as a loss of life, as the article states that over 20,000 traffic fatalities are reported yearly in Thailand. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 16:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Image is not AI generated I can confirm. It just happen so to be a screenshot from a low-res live stream on YouTube. And yes, the bus indeed bears a Mercedes logo. -- Chainwit. (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose The loss of life is horrific. However we almost never post traffic accidents, even really bad ones. And as GeorgeMemulous noted, Thailand has a bad reputation for traffic safety. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose a tragic accident, but I don't think this will any sort of long term impact or effect. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose, tragic but ultimately routine news. For anyone curious, on the livestream, we can see that there's a twist and fold in the hose making it flatter at one angle, and giving the impression that it's disappearing into the ground (and reappearing), especially with the low resolution. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Sigh... with respect, I find myself once again needing to correct the record and point out a double standard in relation to a bus crash which occurs outside of the western world. In March of this year, after 2024 Mmamatlakala bus crash was nominated, there was strong opposition with many claiming that we do not post "routine bus crashes" (similar to what is happening here). At that time, I pointed out that, quite contrary to those claiming we never post automobile accidents, we had actually in fact posted both the Carberry highway collision and Humboldt Broncos bus crash with minimal, if any, opposition. To post those accidents from the Western world but not one with more casualties from a non-western country, would leave ITN readers with the impression that white bus crash victims dying is notable where African or Asian bus crashes are not. In the end, the 2024 Mmamatlakala bus crash was posted to ITN. For consistency and to avoid systemic bias, that precedent should be upheld. This is a devastating event for Thailand and it is being widely reported by global news outlets and there is no reason to break from the precedent we set earlier this year. FlipandFlopped ツ 19:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I understand your position, but in my opinion, the Carberry bus crash would get an oppose vote from me. Of the four mentioned, I'd say the Humboldt Broncos bus crash and 2024 Mmamatlakala bus crash are the only ones that would deserve a blurb, given the former having important and notable passengers killed and the latter having a very high death toll of one identifiable group. That being said, Oppose the 2024 Thai bus crash until if and when a major new development occurs. If all is said and done, it'll stay oppose. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, I wouldn't have supported posting any of these bus crashes. We can always point at previous times we did something to call it a precedent, but it means we never get to actually ask ourselves whether we should've actually be doing it to begin with. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 10:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not interesting to our readers. Tradediatalk 20:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- this is not a forum to discuss if articles are interesting but rather to post articles that are in the news ( WP:ITNPURPOSE ) so no offense but that argument is not valid (keep your oppose vote though not invalidating that!) Ion.want.uu (talk) 01:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per above. Absolutely tragic, but limited impact and likely to have a limited legacy. The Kip (contribs) 00:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support event is significant due to high fatality rate and the circumstance of it being children. Being "not interesting" to readers just because it didn't occur in the Western world shouldn't be any reason to oppose and doesn't diminish its significance and impact. Happily888 (talk) 01:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This is the type of event article that at the present time, it is not clear if it has the enduring coverage that we'd expect for event articles, as is the case for most road traffic accidents, even with the large toll. This is the trouble that we have overall with keeping the encyclopedia to covering news topics that are appropriate for an encyclopedia, with a long tail and influence elsewhere, and not for any current event that gets a burst of news coverage (even if worldwide). Maybe there is some long tail of a story here, but its definitely not obvious, and until it is, we really shouldn't even have an article on it (that's more what Wikinews is for). --Masem (t) 04:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A quick update here, investigations found the bus to have been illegally modified with 10 gas tanks fitted into it. It "likely would" cause a stricter reform in term of bus regulation in Thailand, which IMO makes the incidence significant in term of a lasting effect? (Again with another "?") --Chainwit. (talk) 08:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose although a tragedy, it doesn't have any impact outside Thailand. Willing to reconsider if this somehow changes bus regulations globally or something major happens due to this. Scuba 16:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ITNCDONT says:
Blaylockjam10 (talk) 03:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Please do not… Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
- generally unproductive, but not always Scuba 20:23, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ITNCDONT says:
- Support per Flipandflopped. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 03:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Support: Very terrible bus accident. Notable, with significant death tolls. High Admiral JMT (talk) 03:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Certainly a notable and ITN newsworthy event about a school bus fire that killed many youngsters wherever it happened. STSC (talk) 19:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I looked at this and found it quite interesting as it was not quite the usual bus plunge. Points to note include:
- It was a coach rather than a school bus, having been hired for an outing
- It was about 50 years old and been extensively modded, being converted from an Isuzu to a Mercedes – don't ask me how
- Such incidents are common in Thailand which has a very high rate of traffic accidents – see List of countries by traffic-related death rate
- Andrew🐉(talk) 22:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Andrew Davidson and the bizarre view that ITN only posts things if they have a global impact *facepalm* SerialNumber54129 22:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Jimmy Carter turns 100
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Former U.S. president Jimmy Carter turns 100, the first U.S. president to do so. (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post, The Hill, USA Today, Al Jazeera, BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Moonreach (talk · give credit)
- Oppose Trivia, not the type of news we post. Masem (t) 14:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good for him, but this isn't really news, it's basically trivia, as Masem already said. TomMasterRealTALK 14:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The people over at DYK will probably love this one, good faith nom though. TwistedAxe [contact] 14:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. However, I'd set the criteria for a blurb at being older than Chau Sen Cocsal Chhum, age 103 years 4 months 21 days, the oldest state leader of all time. That or if he dies before then; either way Jimmy Carter is going to get at least one blurb by March 2027 (assuming no other leaders take the title before then). GeorgeMemulous (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above; a birthday isn't exactly ITN. Send this over to the DYK folks instead and let them have at it. qw3rty 15:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support For once, it would be good to report someone continuing to live rather than dying. The topic is making headlines across the world and so qualifies here at ITN. It definitely does not qualify for DYK for several reasons -- it's not a new article or recent GA, it's already a GA and it has previously been run at DYK in 2021. OTD might be a possibility as they do anniversaries but I don't know the ropes there so well. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Now I check, I find that it's already at OTD but it's easy to miss as it's buried down the bottom "Jimmy Carter (b. 1924)". Andrew🐉(talk) 16:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post-close clarification: please DO NOT send this to DYK either. The article exists since more than a week, a five-fold expansion is simply out of the question, and it has already been promoted to GA. There's no possible way for the Jimmy Carter article to meet WP:DYKNEW. Cambalachero (talk) 16:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post-post-close: I already nominated it for OTD a few days ago and it is running today, so we couldn't have had it elsewhere on the main page either way. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Inauguration of Claudia Sheinbaum
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Claudia Sheinbaum (pictured) is inaugurated as the 66th President of Mexico, becoming the first woman to ever hold the office. (Post)
News source(s): NPR, NBC
Credits:
- Nominated by The Wikimonger (talk · give credit)
- Oppose Already commemorated as an election winner in June. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also, Queen Victoria more or less founded Canada in 1867. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not only that. Elizabeth II more recently ruled Canada for 70 years.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- And not only that, but Mary Simon is more or less wielding that mace singlehandedly lately. InedibleHulk (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- 😆 Also 4 of the last 5 have been female + Sauve. Nfitz (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- And if we're playing Devil's semanticist here, there's Kim Campbell, more or less "elected". InedibleHulk (talk) 12:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- 😆 Also 4 of the last 5 have been female + Sauve. Nfitz (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- And not only that, but Mary Simon is more or less wielding that mace singlehandedly lately. InedibleHulk (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not only that. Elizabeth II more recently ruled Canada for 70 years.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything that's changed since the June ITN. Nfitz (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose we already posted her winning the election. Scuba 16:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think we post the presidential inaugurations. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: The news is when the candidate wins the elections. Unless notable for something else, the inauguration is trivial when it happens. Cambalachero (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) New Prime Minister of Japan
Blurb: Shigeru Ishiba (pictured) becomes the Prime Minister of Japan, succeeding Fumio Kishida. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Shigeru Ishiba (pictured) becomes the Prime Minister of Japan, after winning the Japanese Liberal Democratic Party leadership election.
Alternative blurb II: After winning the Liberal Democratic Party leadership election, Shigeru Ishiba (pictured) becomes the Prime Minister of Japan, succeeding Fumio Kishida.
Alternative blurb III: Shigeru Ishiba (pictured) succeeds Fumio Kishida as the Prime Minister of Japan, after winning the Liberal Democratic Party leadership election.
News source(s): NHK, Japan Today, Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by Midori No Sora (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Borgenland (talk · give credit), TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit), Faustino Sojo (talk · give credit), ValenciaThunderbolt (talk · give credit) and ギルディアス156世 (talk · give credit)
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Shigeru Ishiba has officially been accepted as the 102nd Prime Minister of Japan by the Diet. However, the article still needs some work done. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 05:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Duplicate nomination with the 27 September one, and the item should be posted ASAP. Unnamelessness (talk) 05:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- That nomination was closed with consensus to wait till inauguration. Abcmaxx (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Election article is good sourcing wise, but the background info is lacking info between 9/11 to 9/27 and that's a huge/crucial part of the election coverage. Ishiba's article also has a few cn tags, given the overall improved state of the article.Support Expanded the LDP article and addressed cn tags on Ishiba's article. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)- Support per ITN/R Scuba 16:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- amended as ITN/R. Abcmaxx (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support both the the PM's article and the election article are in good shape. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. The Kip (contribs) 17:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Still an orange tag in the election article, and agree with TDKR that the post-9/11 coverage is still lacking. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Chaotic Enby: Issues fixed. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support because it's a new head of state and ITN/R. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 23:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @JohnAdams1800, if something is ITN/R, then the only matter to comment on is whether article quality is up to scratch. Schwede66 23:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- To clarify, he's not head of state but head of government, Japan is a constitutional monarchy, with Naruhito as head of state. AusLondonder (talk) 20:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- @JohnAdams1800, if something is ITN/R, then the only matter to comment on is whether article quality is up to scratch. Schwede66 23:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Support: Now that he has inaugurated, I support very much since the head of government in Japan has changed, and Japan is a very notable country worldwide. High Admiral JMT (talk) 03:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Addressed update/sourcing issues on both articles. Should be good. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey! That's my image I uploaded! In all seriousness, in all seriousness, support. Both articles look good. Someone vastly improved the LDP leadership election article also; thanks to them. River10000 (talk) 13:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
September 30
September 30, 2024
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
|
RD: Ken Page
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): RadioTimes.com, Extra
Credits:
- Nominated by Happily888 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by InedibleHulk (talk · give credit) and Võ T. Kiên (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Happily888 (talk) 10:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support American voice and stage actor of several memorable characters, aged precisely 70. A lot of the Career section might look unsourced, until you follow the Wikilinks. I, for one, don't mind following the Wikilinks. InedibleHulk (talk) 12:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose vast swaths of article are uncited, including most of his biography and his entire filmography and discography. Scuba 16:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
RD: Pete Rose
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [7]
Credits:
- Nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
– Muboshgu (talk) 23:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support seems to be fairly well-written article pbp 23:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I can’t see the actual article but one thing is for sure. The omission of Pete Rose from the list of recently departed is inexcusable. In a way the omission is fitting though because Major League Baseball has for years swept under the rug one of its greatest all time players due to his questionable off the field behavior. All the more reason to put it up on the Wikipedia recent passings. BertDanielCoolBreeze (talk) 23:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose several unreferenced sections; no section on death, it seems. Therapyisgood (talk) 23:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not Ready This one is going to take some work before it can be posted. Referencing is dreadful. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:45, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Picture A famous name from his era and we have a good baseball-card style picture. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Whether that image is actually legit free (in this case, published w/o copyright) is extremely unclear based on the source it was pulled from, given that it was just added today to Commons — Masem (t) 12:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support article looks good and Rose was the face of baseball. So much so that I think we should consider a blurb for him. Scuba 16:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I would not say that Rose was the face of baseball. However, I would be willing to support a blurb as he does have the most hits (a record unlikely to be broken). Unfortunately, I am doubtful that a blurb is happening, as he is not a Pele or a Maradona. Natg 19 (talk) 18:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose multiple cn tags and many unsourced statements. Also, I am also oppose to a blurb. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not ready: a few CN tags. Once article is of good quality, support RD (major figure in a major sport), but oppose blurb.
- -insert valid name here- (talk) 17:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb. Not that much famous or transformative. BilboBeggins (talk) 21:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb - I would think that a bare prerequisite for any MLB player's death to be posted on ITN as a blurb would be that player being elected to that league's hall of fame. Duly signed, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 13:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is an interesting situation, because Rose is 100% worthy of the HOF based on his baseball accomplishments. But he has been denied entry due to gambling and was "banned" from baseball. Natg 19 (talk) 15:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- You're really going to use that argument against Rose? Scuba 20:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Orange tag for inadequate sourcing in the Records and achievements section. There are also multiple footnote-deficient paragraphs the rest of the prose. Please add more REFs. --PFHLai (talk) 11:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Israel launches a ground operation in Lebanon
Blurb: Israel launches a ground invasion of Lebanon aimed to clear Hezbollah's border infrastructure. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Israel launches a cross-border ground operation in Lebanon aimed to clear Hezbollah's border infrastructure.
Alternative blurb II: Israel launches a ground invasion of Lebanon as part of the current Israel–Hezbollah conflict
Alternative blurb III: Israel begins a ground operation in Lebanon aimed to clear Hezbollah's border infrastructure.
News source(s): https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/09/30/israel-lebanon-hezbollah-hamas-war-news-gaza/
Credits:
- Nominated by GeorgeMemulous (talk · give credit)
- Created by PopularGames (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Prodrummer619 (talk · give credit), IvanIOOfficial (talk · give credit), Braganza (talk · give credit) and Bitspectator (talk · give credit)
Yet another escalation to Israel's war against Hezbollah. Not sure if "invasion" or "operation" is correct here, so I added both as altblurbs. Article isn't up to ITN levels yet. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- support - i think "invasion" is more fitting as the title while "operation" sounds more fitting for the blurb Braganza (talk) 21:25, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support maybe we should just move the Israel-Hezbollah war to ongoing? Scuba 21:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- This was added to ongoing several days ago, listed as Israel–Hezbollah conflict. Natg 19 (talk) 22:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
I'll support on significance too, but as GeorgeMemulous says, the article's not quite there. We can put the war in ongoing when this rolls off.Oh, duh, ack, last time I looked at the ongoing discussion it was headed for rejection (at least for the time being), and like a dolt I didn't actually look at the template. —Cryptic 21:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)- Oppose/wait nothing has happened yet, Israel has only made this intention known. Masem (t) 21:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose We already have Israel–Hezbollah conflict in Ongoing and this is just today's latest operation. The topic is contentious and so its quality is unlikely to be stable. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Wait - I'm not sure this has started yet.Support Alt II. Bitspectator ⛩️ 22:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)- Wait and Support: Wait until more happens. By then, my vote will be support. High Admiral JMT User talk:High Admiral JMT 23:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, large scale incursion into Lebanon, confirmed by the media Personisinsterest (talk) 23:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose covered by the ongoing entry Israel–Hezbollah conflict. Natg 19 (talk) 23:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's in ongoing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- so you would add it in a few weeks? Braganza (talk) 06:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
OpposeWe knew that the Israeli invasion of Lebanon (which is all about destroying Hezbollah) was coming when the ongoing was added. This is in the already doubled ongoing. Nfitz (talk) 00:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC) See below.- Update the current blurb to say Israel launched a ground [whatever] following the assassination of Nasrallah. Levivich (talk) 00:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- This guy gets it. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Bitspectator ⛩️ 01:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is the way. RachelTensions (talk) 03:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - This blurb implies that the assassination of Nasrallah is linked to the beginning of this incursion, when they are two mutually exclusive events. There's no reason to combine them together. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 08:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hwat? I'm pretty sure they're not mutually exclusive considering they both actually happened... also, pretty sure they're linked. Levivich (talk) 13:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support it's a major development. Banedon (talk) 01:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think its reasonable to say that this invasion/operation is covered by ongoing Hungry403 (talk) 02:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- No more reasonable than to say the same about Hassan Nasrallah's featured and connected murder; once combined, they can roll off together and whatever happens afterward can remain Ongoing (unless it's bigger, maybe). InedibleHulk (talk) 03:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment With respect, "It's covered by ongoing" is not, without more, a useful contribution to this notability discussion. There is no ITNC rule which states that the two are mutually exclusive and there are obviously some circumstances where a blurb for a major development within an ongoing conflict is necessary. IMHO, future discussion should address the actual substance of whether it is a sufficiently notable development to merit a blurb.
- As for my personal view, I would wait and then support for accuracy - if the scale of the incursions is as big as initial reports, this is one of the most geopolitical notable events of the decade and marks a major spread of active boots on the ground warfare in the Middle East. The article is not there yet though and that is owing in part to the situation still rapidly evolving/literally under way overnight as we speak. FlipandFlopped ツ 04:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. One sovereign state officially invading another sovereign state always merits a blurb even if it is technically covered by ongoing, since it is a massive escalation. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support, possibly to replace the Nasrallah blurb. UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think replacement's possible, but addition's popular. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @InedibleHulk and UndercoverClassicist: how about @Levivich's proposal Braganza (talk) 07:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. Literally and figuratively. The man's an idea machine. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that's what I had in mind. UndercoverClassicist T·C 07:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. Literally and figuratively. The man's an idea machine. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @InedibleHulk and UndercoverClassicist: how about @Levivich's proposal Braganza (talk) 07:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think replacement's possible, but addition's popular. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - This is basically the biggest development in the conflict since October 7th, even with ongoing this is a major development that is notable enough to be blurbed. The ongoing item should probably be renamed to something like 'Israeli invasion of Lebanon' (maybe rephrase somehow to reflect Hezbollah being the main target rather than Lebanon itself). PrecariousWorlds (talk) 08:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom and above. TyphoonAmpil [citation needed] 09:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support alternative blurb II. We really shouldn't be putting Netanyahu's POV so explicitly on our main page. Netanyahu claims this is a "limited ground operation", similar to how Putin claims the invasion of Ukraine was "a special operation". Let's not take sides and just state the facts.VR (Please ping on reply) 09:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Can an admin WP:SNOW move the article before it gets posted? I see 22 supports to 1 oppose.VR (Please ping on reply) 09:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Can someone explain why this isn't covered by the Hezbollah ongoing we added only 4 days ago in a discussion that contemplated this very invasion? Nfitz (talk) 12:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- After reflection, this is just too big not to blurb.
Supportbut remove from ongoing until this rolls off and remove the current assassination blurb (but post this at top). Support Alt 2. Sorry User:Kcmastrpc. Nfitz (talk) 12:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)- No need to apologize, you're making good arguments. I would lean towards support if the ground incursion could be confirmed larger in scope, but at the moment it appears to be targeted and limited. If that changes, then I will reconsider my position. Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's hard to tell what they are thinking. Aggressors frequently play down their operations for logistical reason. And on the other hand, if Iran does, as the US is claiming they are about to do, and launch ballistic missiles at Israel, will we see yet another blurb? And another when USA fires ballistic missiles at Iran? I keep flipping on this. Nfitz (talk) 16:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- No need to apologize, you're making good arguments. I would lean towards support if the ground incursion could be confirmed larger in scope, but at the moment it appears to be targeted and limited. If that changes, then I will reconsider my position. Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- After reflection, this is just too big not to blurb.
- Oppose Per above, the point of ongoing was to capture the evolving headlines that arose out of this conflict, including the well anticipated ground incursion. What's the use of ongoing if we're just going to blurb every major development on this topic? Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- If it wasn't for the lesser development currently still posted on its own, I'd hear you. You're making perfect sense, clearly. But there's a cognitive dissonance (in me), and we all know that's what everyone wants stopped at all costs (in each's own). So what? Pull it? InedibleHulk (talk) 12:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I'd considered that, but I had also opposed the posting of the HQ strike as a standalone blurb. The pager attack seemed novel and what turned out to be the beginning of a very deliberate campaign by Israel, so that seemed warranted. If this develops into a full blown invasion, per above, I could be convinced to support a blurb, but at the moment this is a well-anticipated (albeit sad) development in an ongoing conflict. Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's not sad for the children of the profiteers (and their children), at least, who also need to eat. Tolerance and wisdom are complicated, sometimes too winding. I haven't quite !voted either way yet, technically, so I'll let you choose for me and then just try not to think about it. InedibleHulk (talk) 13:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I'd considered that, but I had also opposed the posting of the HQ strike as a standalone blurb. The pager attack seemed novel and what turned out to be the beginning of a very deliberate campaign by Israel, so that seemed warranted. If this develops into a full blown invasion, per above, I could be convinced to support a blurb, but at the moment this is a well-anticipated (albeit sad) development in an ongoing conflict. Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- If it wasn't for the lesser development currently still posted on its own, I'd hear you. You're making perfect sense, clearly. But there's a cognitive dissonance (in me), and we all know that's what everyone wants stopped at all costs (in each's own). So what? Pull it? InedibleHulk (talk) 12:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I feel that the addition of "ongoing" a few days ago is enough for now Tradediatalk 14:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support As per above, I believe this shouldn't just be ongoing since it is such a major escalation. Support for Levivich's suggestion, and push it to the top as well Sharrdx (talk) 14:35, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support and support swapping out Israel-Hezbollah war for this article in ongoing. Scuba 16:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait - I'm going to change my mind again. This is moving too quickly, and all the blurbs are likely out of date with Iran's attack. Let's see what happens in the next few hours. Nfitz (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment IMHO, this is why we have ongoing, because the situation is always evolving. Kcmastrpc (talk) 16:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think adding this would be having far too many stories about this conflict in a fortnight, that's what we have ongoing for. Even, if this does end up getting posted then Nasrallah's death news should be removed. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose It’s a highly notable development, hence a weak oppose rather than a full one, but between the airstrikes (that ended up pulled), death of Nasrallah, this, and now the Iranian missile strikes, we don’t want to overwhelm ITN solely with blurbs relating to this conflict - that’s literally why we added it to ongoing. The Kip (contribs) 17:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm satisfied with the combined blurb. The Kip (contribs) 00:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose covered by an ongoing entry. LiamKorda 17:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Support. Of course this event is related to the Ongoing item, but this is, really, the most significant event of the conflict. If it needs to happen, I think the best solution would be to delist the Ongoing item and post this. DarkSide830 (talk) 18:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support altblurb 2 It's an invasion, not an "operation", Mr. Putin. And, even if it's related to Ongoing, it's still very much significant beyond routine war coverage. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt II: Very significant escalating event in the conflict. We just decided to include the assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, even though that is also part of the conflict. I don't see the problem. BappleBusiness[talk] 22:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted a combined blurb with October 2024 Iranian strikes against Israel. Schwede66 22:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Gavin Creel
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
- Updated by PrinceofPunjab (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Thriley (talk) 18:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support article needs some citations but overall looks good Scuba 16:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support a such heartbreaking news, gone far too soon. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Citations needed. Stephen 23:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Stephen I think I have resolved all the major issues. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 18:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support article has been updated and sourced meeting ITN requirements. Happily888 (talk) 09:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 13:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Humberto Ortega
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): France24
Credits:
- Nominated by Innisfree987 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit) and Innisfree987 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nicaraguan general, brother to President Daniel. Article needs work but we can expect substantial obits to make it easier. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose vast swaths of the article are uncited. Scuba 16:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose majority of the information on the article is unsourced. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I believe I’ve now addressed or removed all unsourced material. Innisfree987 (talk) 06:11, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 13:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Dikembe Mutombo
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [8]
Credits:
- Nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
– Muboshgu (talk) 15:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Article looks in shape. Death of a legend. Prodrummer619 (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support article is in good shape. Scuba 16:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support article seems in a good shape. It is ready to be posted. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station closure
Blurb: The last coal-fired power station in the United Kingdom, Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station, closes after 142 years of country's fossil fuel usage. (Post)
Alternative blurb: The last coal-fired power station in the United Kingdom, Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station, closes 142 years since the first use of coal power there during the Industrial Revolution.
Alternative blurb II: Ratcliffe-on-Soar (pictured), the last coal-fired power station in the United Kingdom, closes.
News source(s): CNN, BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Brandmeister (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Although national level, this looks like a certain milestone with the background of Industrial Revolution that will probably be mentioned in the textbooks on clean energy and history. Brandmeistertalk 13:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support: article looks good, and agreed that this closure takes on broader significance as the end of a (long) story of coal use in Britain, with all of the tie-ins with the history of industry implied by that. The fact that this is being reported in non-British news sources adds weight here, I think. UndercoverClassicist T·C 14:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support article is in a good shape and I think it is notable enough per the nom. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Last bit of the blurb ("closes after 142 years of country's fossil fuel usage") doesn't really make sense. AusLondonder (talk) 14:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- How about "closes, 142 years since the first use of coal power there during the Industrial Revolution?" This isn't, sadly, the end of fossil fuel power in the UK. UndercoverClassicist T·C 14:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's rather misleading as coal has mainly been supplanted by natural gas from beneath the North Sea and that's a more convenient fossil fuel whose use will continue. My house in London used to have a coal shed and open fires. It still has fireplaces and chimneys per Chim Chim Cher-ee but is now mostly heated by a natural gas boiler. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well, Gawd bless ya, Moiry Pappins! Martinevans123 (talk) 15:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe I've missed it, but after 2015, when Thoresby Colliery closed, where did the coal come from? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- That was a deep mine. See open-pit coal mining in the United Kingdom. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Do you think the article should mention this? (The UK imported 3.4 million tonnes of coal in 2023, 45% of this coming from the USA). Martinevans123 (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- That was a deep mine. See open-pit coal mining in the United Kingdom. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Added altblurb1 as per suggestion by UndercoverClassicist, as not to imply the UK has moved away from fossil fuels. Abcmaxx (talk) 21:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose sadly this is the type of article and story that falls between the gap of ITN and DYK. The news is interesting but on the significance of news, very minor (if this meant the UK was fully on nuclear and renewables, that might be different), and the article is not appropriate for DYK due to age and small update size. I'd love to find a solution for these interesting news blips with good quality articles to be featured, and maybe that is ITN but we'd need to tighten down how these are selected as well. Masem (t) 15:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose belongs in a did you know blurb, not ITN. Scuba 15:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - seems rather minor and local. And yes seems like there's a hook here for a DYK - especially as they have about triple the space that ITN gets. Nfitz (talk) 16:11, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- ITN is not allocated space by some higher power; its lack of space just reflects its lack of productivity. DYK is about 20 times more productive and so has decided to expand lately to cope with the volume of its entries. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This has actually made global headlines. Adding the historical context that Great Britain was the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution, it looks like the energy transformation is well underway into a new era. Abcmaxx (talk) 21:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, despite the Tories' best efforts. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose I believe that this is an interesting development and important enough to be on ITN, but the part of the article covering the actual closure of the plant is too short. It should be expanded or made into another article entirely. Hungry403 (talk) 02:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It was Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government that broke the power of the coal miners and pushed for alternatives. I did some work on the government's systems at that time and was impressed at seeing the Payable Order for the regular subsidy for the National Coal Board as it was about £600M. You see deep coal mining was uneconomic then and it's even more so now. Open cast mining is much cheaper and great quantities of it are shovelled up in Australia to be burnt in China's power stations. UK coal production peaked at about 300 million tons a year but that was a hundred years ago. China now consumes over ten times that. It's their coal usage that matters most. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Kind of puts things in perspective, alas? Martinevans123 (talk) 10:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It was Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government that broke the power of the coal miners and pushed for alternatives. I did some work on the government's systems at that time and was impressed at seeing the Payable Order for the regular subsidy for the National Coal Board as it was about £600M. You see deep coal mining was uneconomic then and it's even more so now. Open cast mining is much cheaper and great quantities of it are shovelled up in Australia to be burnt in China's power stations. UK coal production peaked at about 300 million tons a year but that was a hundred years ago. China now consumes over ten times that. It's their coal usage that matters most. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Added altblurb2 for conciseness --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 02:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral, added photo for photo. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not important enough for ITN. Tradediatalk 19:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: saw this on Canadian news last night. C F A 💬 23:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support original blurb There are multiple categories of things that can be "in the news". Sometimes they are tragedies (a death, a war), sometimes victories (an election, a sports team). Other times, global headlines is just things human beings find interesting. "Interesting" alone is not good enough for ITN, but if the reason for the interest is something historic or symbolic, I think that's the type of story we should have at ITN. In this case, the news is both interesting and symbolic of a major shift in our society (the former industrial capital of the world no longer uses coal). I say blurb it. FlipandFlopped ツ 00:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
RD: Park Ji-ah
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Korea Times
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:A4F3:9501:BEE:C932 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Valenzuela400 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
South Korean actress. 240F:7A:6253:1:A4F3:9501:BEE:C932 (talk) 08:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Aside from the unsourced filmography, the article is basically a stub. No section talking about her career whatsoever. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality. Much work needs to be done, as currently the article only hosts basic information about her personal life and, besides two tables, minimal information on her acting career. ArkHyena (talk) 10:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose article is a stub with about ~110 words long prose and unsourced filmography. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose article consists of a single sentence about her divorce, and an uncited filmography. needs major work to be in good enough shape. Scuba 17:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Typhoon Krathon
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Typhoon Krathon (pictured) leaves at least 1 people dead in the Philippines and Taiwan. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Typhoon Krathon (pictured) leaves at least one people dead in the Philippines and Taiwan.
News source(s): [9] [10] [11]
Credits:
- Created and nominated by TyphoonAmpil (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Category 4-equivalent typhoon, Very strong typhoon on JMA. TyphoonAmpil [citation needed] 04:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait or close. This nomination suffers from many of the same issues as the first nomination of Hurricane Helene for ITN. Currently, no significant impacts have been caused by Krathon. Though this may change should its forecasted landfall on Taiwan verify, it is inappropriate to nominate this to ITN before the fact. ArkHyena (talk) 04:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait for more significant impacts, as per the Hurricane Helene nomination. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 04:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
September 29
September 29, 2024
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(posted) RD: Rohan de Saram
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Telegraph
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Influential cellist from Sri Lanka, trained in Italy, England and by Pablo Casals, who worked for decades with the major composers of contemporary classical music at his time, as the cellist of the Arditti Quartet and in other formations. I'm not where I want to be with the article but will be away for a day. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support article is good enough to be posted, however, it would be better if the life and career section is broken down into different sections. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- I did that, and added another ref. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted – robertsky (talk) 13:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Stoika Milanova
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Strad
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Bulgarian violinist who made an international career after winning some important competitions, playing at the Proms and in Japan, and teaching for years in Venezuela and then Bulgaria. Her father was a violin teacher, her sister a pianist, and her daughter another violinist. Much of the article was there because of the competitions and the Proms. More reviews would be nice. I need to turn to a cellist. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support article is in a good enough shape to be posted. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 11:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Richard S. Hamilton
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [12]
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gumshoe2 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
One of the most influential geometers of the last 50 years passed away Sep. 29. It was reported on blogs at the time and today has been confirmed by his department. Gumshoe2 (talk) 21:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Well-referenced article and updated. — MarkH21talk 05:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support As a layman, I cannot in good conscience confirm whether everything (or anything) in "Mathematical work" is "true" or "false", but know a footnote when I see it and see plenty. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 21:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Ozzie Virgil Sr.
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Detroit Free Press
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Bagumba (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
First Domincan-born player in Major League Baseball. —Bagumba (talk) 07:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good enough for posting. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality. Minus the awfully large quote in the middle of his playing career, this article is virtually a stub and needs more expanding along with some MOS fixes. Kline • talk • contribs 14:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose the career section mostly consists of a quote and there is no information about his life after 1988.ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)- I will add more later today. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Kline and PrinceofPunjab: The quote has been paraphrased, and some bits added. Feedback appreciated. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 04:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article seems good enough now to be posted. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 22:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) 2024 Nepal floods
Blurb: Flooding in Nepal leaves at least 193 people dead. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Flooding in Nepal leaves at least 193 people dead, including 37 in the nation's capital, Kathmandu
News source(s): Economic Times, Reuters, NPR
Credits:
- Nominated by ForsythiaJo (talk · give credit)
- Created by Noble Attempt (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Noble Attempt (talk · give credit) and ForsythiaJo (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Flooding caused by the heaviest rainfall in the country's recent history, with a death toll that's likely to rise. ForsythiaJo (talk) 02:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Notable disaster, high death toll, article is honestly in good shape. The Kip (contribs) 02:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Very notable disaster with high death tolls. High Admiral JMT (talk) 03:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. High death toll, and the article is in an adequate shape. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 05:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There are a few sentences about flooding in July. I’m not sure if those sentences should be in this article. It also seems like the death toll of 170 includes people who died in July. It’d be good if there was more clarity about the death toll in the current floods. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 07:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The article tells us that this has been happening since July as it's the monsoon season. Flooding is common all over the world and so we need a high bar for such stories. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have to tend to agree here. The deaths are spread out over a long period of time, and like 2024 China floods, these deaths unfortunately happen every year around this time with monsoon/typhoon season in SE Asia. It is not like a signular weather event that caused the deaths. — Masem (t) 12:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- In this case, the ~190 deaths have occurred over 2 days of flooding, not over the course of months. ForsythiaJo (talk) 14:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Which I think is not made very clear in the article, as the impression is that this is a cumulative toll. — Masem (t) 14:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- In this case, the ~190 deaths have occurred over 2 days of flooding, not over the course of months. ForsythiaJo (talk) 14:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- We regularly post cyclones with much lower casualties during their season, so it strikes me a bit why floods should be less notable than cyclones.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- We post too many cyclones too. This is routine weather and that's specifically the sort of stuff that we're not suppose to cover per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NEWSEVENT. ITN seems to have a cabal of cyclone chasers who systematically crank these things out but that's a systemic bias. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have to tend to agree here. The deaths are spread out over a long period of time, and like 2024 China floods, these deaths unfortunately happen every year around this time with monsoon/typhoon season in SE Asia. It is not like a signular weather event that caused the deaths. — Masem (t) 12:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The 170 death toll appears to be specifically about the September floods, in fact sources are saying the death toll is now higher. This is not just a regular occurrence as it has been reported that Kathmandu experienced its highest daily rainfall since 1970. Article is in reasonable shape with good sourcing. AusLondonder (talk) 07:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Some sentences give the impression that the death toll from these floods is 170. However, 1 sentence says “Over 170 Nepalese residents in total were reported to have been killed as a result of flooding in 2024 by 29 September, with 126 having been killed by rainfall in late September.” That’s why I wrote that more clarity is needed. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 08:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- There's a justified "lead too short" tag that would have to go first before posting can be considered. Schwede66 09:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Lead too short. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 09:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support lede seems to be adequate now and death toll in September is significant enough but I am not sure about the images bemuse it looks like copyrighted work being passed off as own work. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Just my thoughts. I've had a look around and nominated the file for deletion. Schwede66 20:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Not the greatest article we've ever had, but consensus is to post this. I've done some tidy up work to make it slightly more presentable. Schwede66 20:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
2024 Austrian legislative election
Blurb: The far-right Freedom Party of Austria wins a plurality of votes in the 2024 Austrian legislative election. (Post)
Alternative blurb: The Freedom Party of Austria wins a plurality in the 2024 Austrian legislative election.
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: National election per ITN/R; preliminary results announced. Abcmaxx (talk) 18:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait until the official results come out. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 18:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support regardless of the offical results which will take some time to trickle out, every media outlet is treating this as a FPO victory. If the official count has something different that in itself would be a major news event. For reference: AP, Al Jazeera,Reuters, WaPo. Scuba 22:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Im not sure what the norm for this is but shouldn't a picture of Herbert Kickl be included in the blurb? Scuba 22:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not Ready Referencing is in rough shape. Also, we don't include editorial descriptives such as "far right, far left etc." in blurbs. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'd hardly call widely accepted descriptors as "far-right", "far-left", (or "centrist", ...) as editorial! Nfitz (talk) 23:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- They are when they are used in wiki-voice. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. What's significant here is the far-right aspect - which I don't think any English-speaking media dispute. Nfitz (talk) 00:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- We report election results. To the best of my memory we have never made comments about anybody's political ideology in our blurbs. When Fidel Castro died we did not refer to him as far left, a communist or a dictator. Nor should we have though he was unquestionably all of those things. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- And Friend Computer reminds everyone not to overlook, a commie, a mutant, a traitor, and a commie mutant traitor! Have a fantastic day-cycle! (I mean, he survived all those assassination attempts, after all...) --Slowking Man (talk) 03:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- What's different here though, is that a huge part of the story is that the party is far-right. No policy precludes us from mentioning it at ITN, and we certainly frequently refer to that party as far-right in Wikivoice - such as at Freedom Party of Austria and 2024 Austrian legislative election. Nfitz (talk) 03:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- There's a difference between covering it in an article where it can be discussed and whacking it on the front page. I don't recall any time when an ideological descriptor was used for an election win in an ITN blurb. 5225C (talk • contributions) 04:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- We report election results. To the best of my memory we have never made comments about anybody's political ideology in our blurbs. When Fidel Castro died we did not refer to him as far left, a communist or a dictator. Nor should we have though he was unquestionably all of those things. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. What's significant here is the far-right aspect - which I don't think any English-speaking media dispute. Nfitz (talk) 00:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- They are when they are used in wiki-voice. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem: that's not true I have nominated numerous election blurbs and frequently use the descriptor "conservative", "liberal", "centre-right" etc. and no-one has ever objected to this. Abcmaxx (talk) 07:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- But were they ever posted like that? Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:25, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'd hardly call widely accepted descriptors as "far-right", "far-left", (or "centrist", ...) as editorial! Nfitz (talk) 23:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Scuba. I consider this a victory as well. 64.114 etc 23:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per 64.114 and Scuba. 2604:3D08:9476:BE00:3571:D430:3C7B:6CB9 (talk) 23:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Any support reviews can be reasonable, and this is where what I said comes in. 2605:8D80:400:1A30:5C75:6C5F:45EC:6DDB (talk) 00:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - SchroCat (talk) 01:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article is in good shape. The Kip (contribs) 02:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - the election result doesn't have as much meaning with FPO having almost zero change of forming a government. Wait until there's clearer indication where this will land. Nfitz (talk) 03:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- That doesn't matter. This is a national election that deserves to be included per ITN/R. The only argument you can make is if the article isn't ready to be included, ie: it has too many errors to be included. Scuba 04:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- The results of the election are ITNR - not the election. Perhaps 'Wait until we know what results from this election. Presumably there's a process, and/or the PM will make a statement - I'm not seeing it in this article. Nfitz (talk) 16:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- That doesn't matter. This is a national election that deserves to be included per ITN/R. The only argument you can make is if the article isn't ready to be included, ie: it has too many errors to be included. Scuba 04:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Article looks ready, one tag but it's a relatively minor issue so that doesn't bother me. 5225C (talk • contributions) 04:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now The “Contesting parties” section is orange-tagged. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 07:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now Dozens of CN tags that need to be addressed properly. Ornithoptera (talk) 09:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just putting it here as there are a lot of multiple-way conversations going on above about this matter, but I have never seen a political spectrum description be posted on a politics blurb, unless it is a proper noun like the Centre-right coalition (Italy). I don't doubt that FPO is a far right party and the headlines reflect this, but it has to be consistent. We haven't said the political orientation of Sri Lanka's new president, which is very much part of the news coverage: the BBC say it is a shock result that will give the island its first leader from the left. [13] Were people upholding the status quo when they didn't post he was from the left, or did they just not find it notable? Personally, I find that a lot more notable than this story. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:25, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose there is an orange tags and multiple cn tags. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, article looks good without tags. Shadow4dark (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Still many citation needed tags. Natg 19 (talk) 00:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
References
Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents: