Talk:Giant oarfish

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 12 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Micahdial, Gmcfarlane24.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Sightings =

I found an article on a recent sighting of an Oarfish. The first article seems pretty good, but I feel the second article is way more opinionated. What are your opinions on this? Would you use these sources? (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/07/20/divers-coast-taiwan-catch-rare-giant-oarfish-on-video/70441776007/) (https://news.sky.com/story/rare-deep-sea-oarfish-known-as-harbinger-of-doom-spotted-off-taiwan-coast-12924004) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanavatnet (talk • contribs) 21:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Untitled

They stupidly gave it the nickname "Earthquake Fish."

^^^ Do we really want to say this?

Where? [Also, please sign your posts.] Smarkflea (talk) 23:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

References

Copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.

For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter, here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you. --– Sadalmelik ☎ 13:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Removed sighting claim

Removed the following claim from the Sightings section:

On April 6, 2011, a live specimen measuring 3.5 m (11.5 ft) was found off the east coast of Taiwan, nearly a month after the
devastating tsunami hit Japan in March. The Taiwanese fishermen believed that it surfaced to the shallow water because of the
earthquake in Japan. They gave it the nickname "Earthquake Fish".

The Ribbonfish article claims Taiwanese fishermen call it the earthquake fish. The claim on this article had a link to a Taiwanese news source, but I found it 404 and removed it. Trying to replace it, I googled "earthquake fish"; apparently a lot of different fish are so-called--seems like any unusual fish that shows up after (or before) an earthquake. In addition to R. glesne, I also saw a sunfish, a swordfish, catfish in Lake Biwa, a ribbonfish in the Chesapeake... Anyway, I didn't find this particular sighting. Richigi (talk) 22:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Rewrite

I made extensive edits to this article, trying to conform it more closely to other fish taxa articles and the fish project guidelines. I completely removed the "Sightings" section for the moment, but will probably add it back in as "Notable sightings", limiting it to the very few incidents where a (probably) healthy specimen has been observed. There are actually quite a few sightings (and videos) of giant oarfish every year, and they are no longer considered as rare as they once were. Anyway, this is a work in progress. Richigi (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Merged material from Earthquake fish

Following Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Earthquake_fish, I merged the content of Earthquake fish. However, on checking the sourcing in that article, it turned out to be extraordinarily crappy - consisting of links to the Taiwanese WP, where the refs in turn were the slimmest of mentions. So I cut it down to the verifiable minimum and added a new source. --16:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

==Wiki Education assignment: Deep Sea Biology== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 5 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jmanoog, Gummycrown, Jblythe.bc22 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Johnkim5206.

Weight, mass

I see no information about the typical or maximum mass of the species. That data seems especially relevant for a creature distinguished by its size. Richlumaui (talk) 20:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Maximum size

The claim of 17m/56ft maximum length seems to be a) ancient and b) mistaken - see [2] ("The report of a 15–16 m (50–60 foot) long Regalecus stranded on Stronsay Island in the Orkneys in 1808 is based upon the rotting carcass of a large basking shark"). According to that source, there is no good evidence of lengths significantly over about 8m - all longer specimens were incomplete and the length reportet is that of a questionable reconstruction. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 12:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Queen of the Nagas?

This note on the picture of the fish with the SEALS requires explanation or removal. As is, it's just nonsense. Toyokuni3 (talk) 18:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)