User talk:Golikom: Difference between revisions
Gorani!007 (talk | contribs) →Strength Sports Australia: Reply |
Caution: Unconstructive editing on Anti-gender movement. |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:But there's an implication or at least a lack of clarity in it without the date. The sources cited are about 2024 nominations or "right now" ie 2024. [[User:Golikom|Golikom]] ([[User talk:Golikom#top|talk]]) 02:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
:But there's an implication or at least a lack of clarity in it without the date. The sources cited are about 2024 nominations or "right now" ie 2024. [[User:Golikom|Golikom]] ([[User talk:Golikom#top|talk]]) 02:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Anti-gender movement]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and have been or will be [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. |
|||
* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:Talk:Anti-gender movement|article's talk page]], and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|relevant noticeboards]]. |
|||
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. |
|||
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> [[User:Tataral|Tataral]] ([[User talk:Tataral|talk]]) 23:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:53, 12 December 2024
Strength Sports Australia
Golikom, do you have any relationship which may be considered a conflict of interest in the sport of Powerlifting? Considering you nominated the SSA page to be deleted, it would be good to know if you have any interest in the sport. Gorani!007 (talk) 12:35, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. Golikom (talk) 12:37, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- So you are not involved in the sport at all? Gorani!007 (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. Golikom (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well can I ask that you assist to make this page work. When a page says that "Qualifying for SSA competitions under WDFPF rules is unclear." yet it points to a page that is called qualifying and grading, it is not "unclear". So you block people from providing a "fair and reasonable" change made Gorani!007 (talk) 12:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Provide good 3rd party reliable sources for changes Golikom (talk) 12:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Grading and Qualifying Gorani!007 (talk) 12:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- THat is not 3rd party - take a look at WP:RS and you'll be the sort of sources you need to provide. Golikom (talk) 12:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Grading and Qualifying Gorani!007 (talk) 12:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Provide good 3rd party reliable sources for changes Golikom (talk) 12:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- another point: Due to the transition from APU to SSA and the change of affiliation to WDFPF the composition of board and committees has not been publicised
- It "is" publisised!! Gorani!007 (talk) 12:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Board Gorani!007 (talk) 12:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Again - not 3rd party. Golikom (talk) 12:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- So the claim "Qualifying for SSA competitions under WDFPF rules is unclear" is not proven, so how does that not get removed. It is like saying "it is unclear if x person is a criminal"
- Simply put, it should not say "anything" unless it is factual Gorani!007 (talk) 13:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- And you'll note I have already removed it Golikom (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- We are making progress. Gorani!007 (talk) 13:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Should the claim that the board of directors is unclear also be scrapped?
- It does not make sense. Where else do you find the list of directors for a company other than on their website. if you can not link it to the website, it should not claim it is "unclear" Gorani!007 (talk) 13:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- correction, the claim is "it is not publisised". But it is!! Gorani!007 (talk) 13:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- So you remove the lift of directors because it is not "3rd Party"? Gorani!007 (talk) 10:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am assuming because it points to the company website? Gorani!007 (talk) 10:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- So you remove the lift of directors because it is not "3rd Party"? Gorani!007 (talk) 10:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- correction, the claim is "it is not publisised". But it is!! Gorani!007 (talk) 13:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- And you'll note I have already removed it Golikom (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Again - not 3rd party. Golikom (talk) 12:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Board Gorani!007 (talk) 12:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well can I ask that you assist to make this page work. When a page says that "Qualifying for SSA competitions under WDFPF rules is unclear." yet it points to a page that is called qualifying and grading, it is not "unclear". So you block people from providing a "fair and reasonable" change made Gorani!007 (talk) 12:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. Golikom (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
Hi Golikom, I noticed that you reverted my edit on Phil Foden's page. Thanks for your explanation on it, but "best players in the world" doesn't specify "greatest of all time". And-I don't think adding "in 2024" is a step in the right direction due to the fact we are in 2024 right now (Foden has delivered performances before 2024 too) GgstAv0 (talk) 01:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- But there's an implication or at least a lack of clarity in it without the date. The sources cited are about 2024 nominations or "right now" ie 2024. Golikom (talk) 02:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-gender movement. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tataral (talk) 23:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)