User talk:Swatjester/oldstylee

Archives Archive 1, Archive 2 Archive 3, Archive 4 (last old-style archive) Archive 5, Archive 6, Archive 7 Archive 8, Archive 9 (current), Archive 10 Archive 11, Archive 12 .... Note: Archives are made every 3 days by Misza bot. Current status It's a trap! This battlestation is fully operational. Congratulations! It is my great pleasure to inform you that your Request for Adminship has closed successfully and you are now an administrator! Useful Links: • Administrators' reading list • Administrators' how-to guide • • Administrator's Noticeboard • Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents • Administrator's Noticeboard for 3RR • Your admin logs: • blocks • deletions • moves • protects • uploads • Re:WelcomeG template Ah, I didn't use Template:WelcomeGreen or a personalized welcome template at all. It was Template:WelcomeMenu.;) Btw, Swatjester, why didn't you use the WP:CHU process to have your username changed? (I know it's not my business anyway) Hope you have a great day! ~ Sincerely,PeaceNT 03:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC) I will be. I've got an arbitration case that I want to finish up before I use WP:CHU. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 03:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Hey, the account under the name of SierraSix already exists since you create it, how would WP:CHU be possible? Do you intend to switch?? PeaceNT 14:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC) I was under the impression that they can still do WP:CHU even if I've reserved the other username like that. If not, then I'll just make this a redirect to the other name. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 19:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Eh, if you're keen on that name perhaps you could request to change "User:SierraSix" to "User:Blahblah", then you would be free to change the name of your current account to "SierraSix" :) It isn't complicated, and of course you might think of something better than Blahblah since this name is already taken. PeaceNT 14:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC) I'm sure there's plenty of ways I could go about it. It'll probably be a full month before I get the chance to do it, which is why I reserved the name, so nobody takes it in that time. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 15:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC) Block by Bishonen Against Ferrylodge Regarding Harassment Hi Swatjester. Just FYI, I thought I'd mention to you that I have posted on this subject at ANI. Ferrylodge 13:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC) User:Miskin Is this user was allowed to continue edit in any wiki area?(Block log states that he is allowed only in arbcom case).See Special:Contributions/Miskin and User talk:Miskin.Regards.Must.T C 14:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC) I'm not sure, but I don't really see anything against it. He's in an active arbcom case...he has to be on his best behavior. I think the arbcom only limitation was for the length of his block, that expired a while back. Were there not a case, he'd be unblocked by now, so it follows that his editing is likely not restricted. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 15:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC) I was the last blocking admin in the Miskin case. As his 1-week block for (disputed, see ArbCom) 3RR ended ages ago, he's free to edit what he likes, far as I'm concerned. He was unblocked early to participate in the ArbCom case with the proviso that he not edit anything else; something which he abided by to the letter - Alison ☺ 00:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Swatjester, I think you should release all information that you have on the issue. I have never questioned your integrity as a sysop, but I do think that you have been misguided by off-wiki communications. The published e-mail is elucidating, as it contains patent lies about me being ready to support Miskin in "whatever he does or says". I don't support him as a person, but I do support a certain set of principles that I feel have been neglected in this case. I challenge anyone to provide evidence that I have ever interacted with that particular user either on- or off- Wikipedia, or, better still, that I understand what the Miskin-Mardavich dispute was about, let alone have held some sort of interest in its outcome. Actually, I had not been aware of Miskin's existence before he was blocked. As for NikoSilver, I recall to have polemicized with him (or, rather, with Yannismarou) once over a Macedonia-related issue, where I felt they had been unfair towards User:Dahn. That's about all I know about him. --Ghirla-трёп- 19:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Where the top is edit It's at the other end. ☺ Uncle G 10:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Handling of Unblock Request Swatjester; the following is my "unblock" request: Request reason: "(1)gross, deliberate breach of WP:AFD policy and procedures by User:Ben W Bell whose deletion was vandalism; my reverts were of vandalism - I was fully prepared to abide by due process - there is no limit to the number of times vandalism can be reverted;(2)biased administration that fails to enforce the policy as laid down, User talk:SqueakBox continued re-inserting the vandalism and breached the 3RR yet no action taken; (3) hysterical abuse by User:sony-youth (which persists after the block) indicates gross prejudice and abusive language by several others and combined with their ignoring of due process as laid out by Wiki policy means this whole thing was effectively a kangaroo court; no rules followed - except be myself, who was blocked.(Sarah777 07:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC))" And your response: Decline reason: "reason —No. Stop trolling and wait out your block. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 07:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC)" Could you please explain your behavior in this matter? You provided no reason, instead delivered a gratuitous abusive comment. The block was for 3RR, which was inadvertent as I believed I was reverting vandalism. It was not for "trolling". (Sarah777 00:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)) Your block was for 3RR. Your comments on your talkpage were trolling. Thus, I felt disinclined to unblock you, when you were referring to it as a "kangaroo court". Further claims of "biased administrators" make me even less likely to unblock you.⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 03:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Why? Why should claims of biased administrators make you "even less likely to unblock" me? Is Adminship a place you get to indulge your likes and dislikes? And rather than deleting my reasonable question, a reply would be appreciated. Preferably one considerably less curt than those you have given me so far. (Sarah777 00:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)) Badlydrawnjeff arbitration case I have added mention of you at the Badlydrawnjeff arbitration case in relation to your recent deletion of two articles. As far as I am aware we have never spoken before and I am not aware of your edits or actions previous to this. I am not saying that the action mentioned on that page should occur, just that it is congruous to the proposal of the same action against me. violet/riga (t) 08:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC) I have replied to your comment at the arbitration [1]. violet/riga (t) 22:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)