User talk:XGustaX

Language boxes

Oh, those things? You can get them here: Wikipedia:Babel -- just follow the instructions and pick out all the ones you like. --[User:HappyCamper|HappyCamper] (UTC)

Okay thank you I apperricate it (XGustaX 20:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC))

Not really sure (XGustaX 20:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC))

Swedish-Argentines

Excellent article! Hope to see more about European immigrants in Argentina! =) --CrazyAmerican 16:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for taking so long. The article was tagged by Marianocecowski (talk · contribs) as a "direct copyvio" of http://www.nordicway.com/argentina.htm. Sincerely I don't see what's the problem here, the website provided doesn't state any exclusive rights, and in my opinion this is not copyright infringement. Also it should be noted that Wikipedia itself encourages editors to create and improve new articles, you know, META:ACP, WP:BOLD, WP:IAR, etc., so why this article cannot be on Wikipedia?

Homever, I think you must contact Nordicway.com and ask for permission. If this cannot be obtained you can always reword most of the page or, of course, include this information on other articles (Argentina, Buenos Aires) and then cite this website as a source, but it's up to you. Hope this helps mate, I don't want to loss this wonderful article! Goodbye. --CrazyAmerican 04:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations!

For your amazing work on Swedish, Norwegian and European immigrants in Argentina, and in general for all your contributions in Wikipedia, I respectfully award you the Argentine Barnstar of National Merit. Have a good day mate! —NihilAliudScitNecessitasQuamVincere 02:54, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please, removing inportant anti-vandalism information from anonymous users is considered vandalism. Mariano(t/c) 11:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

I have reason to believe that the following are accounts created by you in order to vote several times for page deletions: FR-Altas, Celto, Forhonor and IIIV. I am basing this on the following observations:

• The similar signature of the above users' posts in the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Largest_empires page.
• The brevity of the contribution history of the above users.
• The similar edit patterns, e.g.
  • Costa Rica
    • By "Celto": http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Costa_Rica&diff=prev&oldid=61545118
    • By you: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Costa_Rica&diff=prev&oldid=45322331
• Similarity in the standard of English used in posts. (Although far superior to my foreign language skills, it is obviously not that of a native English speaker).

If I have mistakenly accused you then I sincerely and completely apologise. I look forward to hearing your response. Gsd2000 17:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Sorry I meant FR-Altas re the Costa Rica edits. Gsd2000 18:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Removals and edit summaries

Just a little advice... When you change figures and especially when you remove information, please do explain why, or on what grounds (regarding Wikipedia policies, sources, etc.) you did that. For example this was not "wrong" — it was a debatable opinion (falls under WP:NOR). And this was not vandalism or obviously incorrect, so you really should summarize it with more than simply "revert". Here you called the same content "vandalism" when it clearly is not. Other editors can understandably take issue with these removals and with you.

Since you've been working on certain controversial fields (and removing sensitive information), you really really should make yourself clear in all cases, except when you're doing something minor like correcting a typo or a very obvious mistake. If the edit summary is not long enough, use the talk page. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 12:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Are you making fun of me? I've just tagged User:24.60.174.79 as yet another suspected sockpuppet of you for the mess he/you made in Argentina. I should block you right now for evading blocks and 3RR, but I'll wait a bit more. If any of "you guys" does anything, you'll all be blocked. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 19:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppetting again? XGustaX should be permanently banned. Gsd2000 23:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Removing vandalism info again

I'm getting seriously tired of you and your puppets and your racist comments. Must be patience thins with age. Your last removal of vandalism info and your attempt to bait me were strikes one and two. One more, and I will block you. Consider yourself warned. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 18:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

~hey

No, I am Argentine. You speak swedish? I started clases last tuesday :D. Do you have msn? --Dexter_prog (talk • contribs • count) @ 01:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Yeah I read your user page. My ancestry is italian, I guess. I am interested in all nordic languages and Swedish was the one most available here, besides it is similar to norwegian and danish, so that's great. My msn is: the_secret_phoenix@hotmail.com add me. Hej då --Dexter_prog (talk • contribs • count) @ 12:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Restaurantaleman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Restaurantaleman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok thanks. (XGustaX 01:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC))

Follow up

Sorry for my tardiness. I think the IP has stopped; in any case, I am not sure if there is anything which is actionable at the moment. If it happens again, I suggest taking it to WP:AN - I think I'll be a bit busy with some other things on Wikipedia for the time being, and you would get a much quicker response there. HTH. --HappyCamper 01:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Edits in Argentina

May I ask why did you revert my edits in Argentina? For the record, I'm an Argentine. I would never vandalize the article. Nat91 00:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Editing

Please, try to preview your edits to avoid making several versions of the same page, and provide edit summaries when editing a page. Than you, --Mariano(t/c) 00:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

You claim to be editing images out but you are deleting valid text that was added at the same time. What is your rationale for deleting the historical information about Eva Perón? Corto 22:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry Corto I did not, I must have mis-read what they added I thought they just moved it and added more pictures. I will change it now. Thanks, Good wiking,!(XGustaX 23:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC))

Tone

Yout tone of voice is very rude and is not permitted on Wikipedia. Please refrain from doing this any more you have been warned. I have also warned User:Mariokempes and the two of you should just back down. (DoubleNine 18:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC))

This is funny... I'm glad you have a good sense of humour! Mariokempes 22:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Can't help myself- you're a great source of entertainment! No hard feelings. ciao. Mariokempes 23:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Mestizo, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs • reviews)} 00:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Please, you already know you mustn't erase good-faith warnings. Don't do that anymore. Twice. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Removal category deletion opposition

Please do not delete responses to Categories Nominated for Deletion, as you did to. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Relir 21:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Stop doing that. This is the second or third time I have to restore valid warnings on your talk page. If you erase warnings like the above again, you will be blocked. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for One Week

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

[1]--Jersey Devil 04:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppets?

I have reason to believe 24.60.175.168 (talk · contribs) is you, based on the latest edits on Demographics of Argentina and the fact that it's in the same range as your (other) sockpuppets. I noticed you deleted a couple of ethnic minorities from the article while you "reverted vandalism", too. This is the last warning you're going to get; next time you use a sockpuppet, both of you will be blocked. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 13:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

3rr

WP:3RR, you are in violation of the 3rr rule for reverting the Race and geneticsMuntuwandi 05:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

There is no need to disprove your source because studies in mtDNA are widespread and they are not stopping. your source is taking a more political viewpoin than a scientific one see WP:FRINGE. Mainstream science accepts studies involving mtDNA. Wikipedia accepts reliable sources, it is vandalism to remove reliably sourced scientific material.Muntuwandi 02:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

If you continue to edit war at any article, you may receive a temporary block. Please engage in discussion on article talk pages instead of engaging in edit wars. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Collaboration

Reading the talk page I see the other editor has made several attempts at a compromise. I stand by my decision of protecting teh article. This is a collaborative environment and often compromise is a crucial concept to keep things flowing smoothly. Looking at the talk page I see the other editor has attempted to discuss it with you and as stated before reach a compromise which you seemed to have no interest in. This is a content dispute, nothing more. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry that I will not respond via email. This discussion is not regarding personal information or a highly sentisitve discussion. I prefer keep these discussions on wiki. I am also very selective of who i Email as it is not a wiki only account, again my apologies. Life is not black and white, reach a compromise that is all I ask. IT appears he is willing to work on a compromise, go work it out together. Good luck. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)