User talk:Savignac: Difference between revisions
m oops, sp |
Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Nation of Aztlán. using TW |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|align="left" width="100%"|[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Savignac&action=edit§ion=new Click here to leave a new message]. |
|align="left" width="100%"|[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Savignac&action=edit§ion=new Click here to leave a new message]. |
||
|}</div> |
|}</div> |
||
== November 2007 == |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Nation of Aztlán|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Nation of Aztlán]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 08:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:50, 8 November 2007
Here is an example, another and one more of somebodies looking for anything and everything to feel sorry for themselves, so they can treat others like shit and deny the feelings and opinions of others. After all, other people are worthless if they treat you that way. All are worthless, because of a few disputes, that one person is merely the other side of shit-tossing in and just as guilty of. Shift the blame and never admit responsibility! Always be in the right. How fanatically self assured.
Also, if there are any racists (i.e. those above) reading this, always remember that racism can be from any party, merging with all types of ideologies, including radicalism. After all, Adolf Hitler was a socialist (the type you follow) who divided and conquered his country by class conflict, part of which was the evolutionary theories of Social Darwinism and the antisemitic (white devil) canard of weakening the German (colored) people. He has numerous copycats today (e.g. again, the aforementioned), of all different colors and are on the Left as well as Right. They include those who want to implement racial purification, as well as those who want to miscegenate the world ten times over. These are racist ideologies. Forget racist agitation and let people be people. Don't attack them for their choice of partner to have children with, whether of the same race or one different. Let people be people, not social constructs with academic racism to have them perpetually fight back and forth over identity politics. I am me; you don't define me.
November 2007
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nation of Aztlán. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 08:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)