Photovoltaics

Photovoltaic 'tree' in Styria, Austria

Photovoltaics, or PV for short, is a solar power technology that uses solar cells or solar photovoltaic arrays to convert light from the sun directly into electricity. Photovoltaics is also the field of study relating to this technology and there are many research institutes devoted to work on photovoltaics. The manufacture of photovoltaic cells has expanded dramatically in recent years. As of the end of 2006, the total worldwide installed PV capacity was 5.7 gigawatt at peak (GWp), a 36% increase from 2005. Installations increased by 19%. Roughly 90% of this generating capacity consists of grid-tied electrical systems. Such installations may be ground-mounted (and sometimes integrated with farming and grazing) or building integrated. Financial incentives, such as preferential feed-in tariffs for solar-generated electricity and net metering, have supported solar PV installations in many countries including Germany, Japan, and the United States.

Solar photovoltaics provide 0.04% of the world's energy usage. [1] [2]

Current development

Photovoltaic cells produce electricity directly from sunlight

Average solar irradiance, watts per square metre. Note that this is for a horizontal surface, whereas solar panels are normally propped up at an angle and receive more energy per unit area. The small black dots show the area of solar panels needed to generate all of the worlds energy using 8% eff. PVs.

Map of solar electricity potential in Europe

Photovoltaics, or PV for short, is a technology in which light is converted into electrical power. It is best known as a method for generating solar power by using solar cells packaged in photovoltaic modules, often electrically connected in multiples as solar photovoltaic arrays to convert energy from the sun into electricity. To explain the photovoltaic solar panel more simply, photons from sunlight knock electrons into a higher state of energy, creating electricity.

Photovoltaics can refer to the field of study relating to this technology, and the term photovoltaic denotes the unbiased operating mode of a photodiode in which current through the device is entirely due to the transduced light energy. Virtually all photovoltaic devices are some type of photodiode.

Solar cells produce direct current electricity from light, which can be used to power equipment or to recharge a battery. The first practical application of photovoltaics was to power orbiting satellites and other spacecraft and pocket calculators, but today the majority of photovoltaic modules are used for grid connected power generation. In this case an inverter is required to convert the DC to AC. There is a smaller market for off grid power for remote dwellings, roadside emergency telephones, remote sensing, and cathodic protection of pipelines.

Cells require protection from the environment and are packaged usually behind a glass sheet. When more power is required than a single cell can deliver, cells are electrically connected together to form photovoltaic modules, or solar panels. A single module is enough to power an emergency telephone, but for a house or a power plant the modules must be arranged in arrays. Although the selling price of modules is still too high to compete with grid electricity in most places, significant financial incentives in Japan and then Germany triggered a huge growth in demand, followed quickly by production. Although module prices rose and plateaued, it is expected that costs and prices will fall to 'grid parity' in many places around 2010.

Many corporations and institutions are currently developing ways to increase the practicality of solar power. While private companies conduct much of the research and development on solar energy, colleges and universities and institutes also work on solar-powered devices. Most research is being carried out in Germany, Japan, USA and Australia. Solar power has received less research funding than other sources, but is seen as the most likely largest source of electricity in 15 years in the United States.

The most important issue with solar panels is capital cost (installation and materials). Because of much increased demand, the price of silicon has risen and shortages occurred in 2005 and 2006. Newer alternatives to standard crystalline silicon modules including casting wafers instead of sawing , thin film (CdTe, CIGS, amorphous Si, microcrystalline Si), concentrator modules, 'Sliver' cells, and continuous printing processes. Due to economies of scale solar panels get less costly as people use and buy more — as manufacturers increase production to meet demand, the cost and price is expected to drop in the years to come. As of early 2006, the average cost per installed watt for a residential sized system was about USD 6.50 to USD 7.50, including panels, inverters, mounts, and electrical items. In 2007 investors began offering free solar panel installation in return for a 25 year contract to purchase electricity at a fixed price, normally set at or below current electric rates.[3]

A less common form of the technologies is thermophotovoltaics, in which the thermal radiation from some hot body other than the sun is utilized. Photovoltaic devices are also used to produce electricity in optical wireless power transmission.

Worldwide installed photovoltaic totals

See also: Deployment of solar power to energy grids

Template:Wikinews2 World solar photovoltaic (PV) market installations reached a record high of 1.7 gigawatts peak (GWp) in 2006.

The three leading countries (Japan, Germany and the USA) represent 90% of the total worldwide PV installations. China is building a 1.5 GWp PV plant, though.

Germany was the fastest growing major PV market in the world in 2005 and 2006. In 2006, over 1GWp of PV were installed. The German PV industry generates over 10,000 jobs in production, distribution and installation. Over 90% of solar PV installations are in grid-tied applications in Germany. The balance is off-grid (or stand alone) systems. Photovoltaic power capacity is measured as maximum power output under standardized test conditions in "Wp" (watts peak). The actual power output at a particular point in time may be less than or greater than this standardized, or "rated," value, depending on geographical location, time of day, weather conditions, and other factors. Solar photovoltaic arrays have capacity factors of around 19%, which is lower than many other industrial sources of electricity. Therefore the 2006 installed base peak output would have provided an average output of approximately 1 GW (19% × 5,600). This represented 0.06 percent of global demand at the time.

Produced, Installed & Total Photovoltaic Peak Power Capacity (MWp) as of the end of 2006

#	Country or Region	Report Nat. Int.	Cells Produced	Δ Off grid	Δ On grid	2006 Installed	Σ Off grid	Σ On grid	2006 Total	Total Wp/capita	Mod.Price USD/Wp	Insolation kW·h/kWp·yr
	Template:Country data World World	Σ	1,866.1	97.14	1,452	1,549	712.3	5,150	5,862	0.879	3.14-14.0	0800-2800
	European Union	Σ	653.7	16.57	1,032	1,049	111.9	3,108	3,220	6.533	3.8-10.1	0800-2200
1	Germany		514.0	3	950	953	32	2,831	2,863	34.781	5-6.6	1000-1300
2	Japan		919.8	1.531	285.1	286.6	88.59	1,620	1,709	13.374	3.7	1200-1600
3	United States		201.6	37	108	145	270	354	624	2.058	3.75	0900-2150
4	Spain	?	75.3	9.1	51.4	60.5	17.8	100.4	118.2	2.620	3.8-5.6	1600-2200
5	China	?		15		15	73		73	0.055		1300-2300
6	Australia		36.0	7.576	2.145	9.721	60.536	9.765	70.301	3.327	5.6-6.8	1500-2800
7	Netherlands		18.0	0.278	1.243	1.521	5.713	46.992	52.705	3.217	4.1-5.6	1000-1200
8	Italy		11.0	0.5	12	12.5	12.8	37.2	50	0.846	4-4.5	1400-2200
9	France	?	33.5	1.478	9.412	10.89	21.554	22.379	43.933	0.685	4-6.4	1100-2000
10	South Korea		18.0	0.28	20.929	21.209	5.943	28.79	34.733	0.716	4.4-4.8	1500-1600
11	Thailand	?		6		6	30		30	0.477	3.14	2200-2400
12	Switzerland			0.15	2.5	2.65	3.4	26.3	29.7	3.955	4-4.2	1200-2000
13	Austria	?		0.274	1.29	1.564	3.169	22.416	25.585	3.076	4.5-5.4	1200-2000
14	Luxembourg	?			0.042	0.042		23.603	23.603	50.542		1100-1200
15	Canada			3.354	0.384	3.738	18.976	1.508	20.484	0.620	4.7	0900-1750
16	Mexico	?		0.938	0.116	1.054	19.592	0.155	19.747	0.185	6.8-8.1	1700-2600
17	United Kingdom	?	1.9	0.158	3.007	3.165	1.082	12.96	14.042	0.232	4.6-7.2	0900-1300
18	India	?		6		6	12		12	0.010		1700-2500
19	Norway		37.0	0.35	0.053	0.403	7.54	0.128	7.668	1.624	14.0	0800-0950
20	Greece	?		1.049	0.201	1.25	5.081	1.613	6.694	0.601		1500-1900
21	Sweden			0.302	0.301	0.613	4.285	0.555	4.84	0.529	4.1-8.8	0900-1050
22	Belgium	?			2.103	2.103	0.053	4.108	4.161	0.398		1000-1200
23	Finland	?			0.064	0.064	3.779	0.287	4.066	0.768		0800-1050
24	Bangladesh	?		1.134		1.134	>3.6		>3.6	>0.023		1900-2100
25	Sri Lanka	?		0.65		0.65	3.6		3.6	0.187		2200-2400
26	Portugal	?		0.25	0.227	0.477	2.691	0.775	3.466	0.326		1600-2200
27	Denmark			0.04	0.21	0.25	0.335	2.565	2.9	0.531	6.7-10.1	0900-1100
28	Nepal	?		0.333		0.333	2.333		2.333	0.083		1900-2200
29	Israel			0.275		0.275	1.294	0.025	1.319	0.183	5.4	2200-2400
30	Cyprus	?		0.08	0.44	0.52	0.45	0.526	0.976	1.142		1900-2200
31	Czech Republic	?			0.241	0.241	0.15	0.621	0.771	0.075		1100-1300
32	Malaysia	?			0.00452	0.00452		0.486	0.486	0.018	5.94	1950-2250
33	Poland	?		0.027	0.087	0.114	0.319	0.112	0.431	0.011		1100-1300
34	Slovenia	?			0.183	0.183	0.098	0.265	0.363	0.180		1300-1500
35	Ireland	?					0.3		0.3	0.070		1000-1200
36	Hungary	?					0.09	0.065	0.155	0.015		1300-1500
37	Slovakia	?		0.004		0.004	0.064		0.064	0.012		1200-1400
38	Malta	?			0.033	0.033		0.048	0.048	0.118		2100-2200
39	Lithuania	?		0.023		0.023	0.04		0.04	0.012		1100-1300
40	Estonia	?		0.005		0.005	0.008		0.008	0.006		1100-1200
41	Latvia	?		0.001		0.001	0.006		0.006	0.003		1100-1300
#	Country or Region	Report Nat. Int.	Cells Produced	Δ Off grid	Δ On grid	2006 Installed	Σ Off grid	Σ On grid	2006 Total	Total Wp/capita	Mod.Price USD/Wp	Insolation kW·h/kWp·yr

Notes: While National Report(s) may be cited as source(s) within an International Report, any contradictions in data are resolved by using only the most recent report's data. Exchange rates represent the 2006 annual average of daily rates (OECD Main Economic Indicators June 2007)
Module Price:Lowest: 2.5 EUR/Wp (2.83 USD/Wp) in Germany 2003.Highest: 90 NOK/Wp (14.0 USD/Wp) in Norway 2006
Partly Defunct Sources: SEIA - US Solar Industry (2006), PV Power (2007-June), , , IEA PVPS website.

Applications of PV

PV power stations

Main article: Photovoltaic power stations

11 MW Serpa solar power plant in Portugal

The Table below provides details of some of the largest photovoltaic plants in the world. As shown, Germany has a 10 MW photovoltaic system in Pocking, and a 12 MW plant in Arnstein, with a 40 MW power station planned for Muldentalkreis. Portugal has an 11 MW plant in Serpa and a 62 MW power station is planned for Moura. A 20 MW power plant is also planned for Beneixama, Spain. The photovoltaic power station proposed for Australia will use heliostat concentrator technology and will not come into service until 2010. It is expected to have a capacity of 154 MW when it is completed in 2013.

World's largest PV power plants

DC Peak Power	Location	Description	GW·h/year
154 MW**	Mildura/Swan Hill, Australia	Heliostat Concentrator Photovoltaic technology (see Solar power station in Victoria)	270
62 MW**	Moura, Portugal	BP, Yingli Green Energy	88
40 MW*	Muldentalkreis, Germany	550,000 thin-film modules (First Solar) (see Waldpolenz Solar Park)	40
20 MW	Beneixama, Spain	Tenesol, Aleo and Solon solar modules with Q-Cells cells (see Beneixama photovoltaic power plant	30
18 MW**	Nellis AFB, Nevada	PowerLight PowerTracker system (see Nellis Solar Power Plant)	25
13.8 MW	Salamanca, Spain	(see Planta Solar de Salamanca)
12.7 MW	Lobosillo, Spain	(see Lobosillo Solar Park)
12 MW	Arnstein, Germany	1408 SOLON mover (see Erlasee Solar Park)	14
11 MW	Serpa, Portugal	52,000 solar modules (see Serpa solar power plant)	n.a.
10 MW	Pocking, Germany	57,912 solar modules (see Pocking Solar Park)	11.5
9.5 MW	Milagro, Spain	(see Monte Alto photovoltaic power plant)	14

* Project finish date: 2009; ** Under construction, as of December 2007

PV in buildings

Main article: Building-integrated photovoltaic

Photovoltaic solar panels on a house roof.

Building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) are increasingly incorporated into new domestic and industrial buildings as a principal or ancillary source of electrical power, and are one of the fastest growing segments of the photovoltaic industry. Typically, an array is incorporated into the roof or walls of a building, and roof tiles with integrated PV cells can now be purchased. Arrays can also be retrofitted into existing buildings; in this case they are usually fitted on top of the existing roof structure. Alternatively, an array can be located separately from the building but connected by cable to supply power for the building.

Where a building is at a considerable distance from the public electricity supply (or grid) - in remote or mountainous areas – PV may be the preferred possibility for generating electricity, or PV may be used together with wind, diesel generators and/or hydroelectric power. In such off-grid circumstances batteries are usually used to store the electric power.

PV in transport

Main article: Photovoltaics in transport

PV has traditionally been used for auxiliary power in space. PV is rarely used to provide motive power in transport applications, but is being used increasingly to provide auxiliary power in boats and cars.

PV in standalone devices

Solar powered parking meter.

PV has been used for many years to power calculators and novelty devices. Improvements in integrated circuits and low power LCD displays make it possible to power a calculator for several years between battery changes, making solar calculators less common. In contrast, solar powered remote fixed devices have seen increasing use recently, due to increasing cost of labour for connection of mains electricity or a regular maintenance programme. In particular, parking meters , emergency telephones , and temporary traffic signs.

Economics of PV

US average daily solar energy insolation received by a latitude tilt photovoltaic cell.

Power costs

The PV industry is beginning to adopt levelized cost of energy (LCOE) as the unit of cost. The results of a sample calculation can be found on pp. 52, 53 of the 2007 DOE report describing the plans for solar power 2007-2011 [4]. For a 10 MW plant in Phoenix, AZ, the LCOE is estimated at $0.15 to 0.22/kWh.

The table below is a pure mathematical calculation. It illustrates the calculated total cost in US cents per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated by a photovoltaic system as function of the investment cost and the efficiency, assuming some accounting parameters such as cost of capital and depreciation period. The row headings on the left show the total cost, per peak kilowatt (kWp), of a photovoltaic installation. The column headings across the top refer to the annual energy output in kilowatt-hours expected from each installed peak kilowatt. This varies by geographic region because the average insolation depends on the average cloudiness and the thickness of atmosphere traversed by the sunlight. It also depends on the path of the sun relative to the panel and the horizon.

Panels are usually mounted at an angle based on latitude, and often they are adjusted seasonally to meet the changing solar declination. Solar tracking can also be utilized to access even more perpendicular sunlight, thereby raising the total energy output. The calculated values in the table reflect the total cost in cents per kilowatt-hour produced. They assume a 10% total capital cost (for instance 4% interest rate, 1% operating and maintenance cost, and depreciation of the capital outlay over 20 years). (Normally, photovoltaic modules have a 25 year warranty, but they should be fully functional even after 30-40 years.)

20 years	2400 kWh/kWp y	2200 kWh/kWp y	2000 kWh/kWp y	1800 kWh/kWp y	1600 kWh/kWp y	1400 kWh/kWp y	1200 kWh/kWp y	1000 kWh/kWp y	800 kWh/kWp y
200 $/kWp	0.8	0.9	1.0	1.1	1.3	1.4	1.7	2.0	2.5
600 $/kWp	2.5	2.7	3.0	3.3	3.8	4.3	5.0	6.0	7.5
1000 $/kWp	4.2	4.5	5.0	5.6	6.3	7.1	8.3	10.0	12.5
1400 $/kWp	5.8	6.4	7.0	7.8	8.8	10.0	11.7	14.0	17.5
1800 $/kWp	7.5	8.2	9.0	10.0	11.3	12.9	15.0	18.0	22.5
2200 $/kWp	9.2	10.0	11.0	12.2	13.8	15.7	18.3	22.0	27.5
2600 $/kWp	10.8	11.8	13.0	14.4	16.3	18.6	21.7	26.0	32.5
3000 $/kWp	12.5	13.6	15.0	16.7	18.8	21.4	25.0	30.0	37.5
3400 $/kWp	14.2	15.5	17.0	18.9	21.3	24.3	28.3	34.0	42.5
3800 $/kWp	15.8	17.3	19.0	21.1	23.8	27.1	31.7	38.0	47.5
4200 $/kWp	17.5	19.1	21.0	23.3	26.3	30.0	35.0	42.0	52.5
4600 $/kWp	19.2	20.9	23.0	25.6	28.8	32.9	38.3	46.0	57.5
5000 $/kWp	20.8	22.7	25.0	27.8	31.3	35.7	41.7	50.0	62.5

Grid parity

Grid parity, the point at which photovoltaic electricity is equal to or cheaper than grid power, is achieved first in areas with abundant sun and high costs for electricity such as in California and Japan. Grid parity has been reached in Hawaii and other islands that otherwise use diesel fuel to produce electricity. George W. Bush has set 2015 as the date for grid parity in the USA. General Electric's Chief Engineer predicts grid parity without subsidies in sunny parts of the United States by around 2015. Other companies predict an earlier date.[5]

In Italy, PV power has been cheaper than retail grid electricity since 2006. One kWh in Italy costs 21.08  €-cents. [6] Italy has an average of 1,600 kWh/m² sun power per year (Sicily has even more, at 1,800 kWh/m²).

Financial incentives

Main article: PV financial incentives

The political purpose of incentive policies for PV is to grow the industry even where the cost of PV is significantly above grid parity, to allow it to achieve the economies of scale necessary to reach grid parity. The policies are implemented to promote national energy independence, high tech job creation and reduction of CO₂ emissions.

Three incentive mechanisms are used (often in combination):

• investment subsidies: the authorities refund part of the cost of installation of the system,
• Feed-in Tariffs (FIT)/Net metering: the electricity utility buys PV electricity from the producer under a multiyear contract at a guaranteed rate.
• Renewable Energy Certificates ("RECs")

With investment subsidies, the financial burden falls upon the taxpayer, while with feed-in tariffs the extra cost is distributed across the utilities' customer bases. While the investment subsidy may be simpler to administer, the main argument in favour of feed-in tariffs is the encouragement of quality. Investment subsidies are paid out as a function of the nameplate capacity of the installed system and are independent of its actual power yield over time, thus rewarding the overstatement of power and tolerating poor durability and maintenance. Some electric companies offer rebates to their customers, such as Austin Energy in Texas, which offers $4.50/watt installed up to $13,500.

With feed-in tariffs, the financial burden falls upon the consumer. They reward the number of kilowatt-hours produced over a long period of time, but because the rate is set by the authorities, it may result in perceived overpayment. The price paid per kilowatt-hour under a feed-in tariff exceeds the price of grid electricity. "Net metering" refers to the case where the price paid by the utility is the same as the price charged.

Where price setting by supply and demand is preferred, RECs can be used. In this mechanism, a renewable energy production or consumption target is set, and the consumer or producer is obliged to purchase renewable energy from whoever provides it the most competitively. The producer is paid via an REC. In principle this system delivers the cheapest renewable energy, since the lowest bidder will win. However uncertainties about the future value of energy produced are a brake on investment in capacity, and the higher risk increases the cost of capital borrowed.

The Japanese government through its Ministry of International Trade and Industry ran a successful programme of subsidies from 1994 to 2003. By the end of 2004, Japan led the world in installed PV capacity with over 1.1 GW.[7]

In 2004, the German government introduced the first large-scale feed-in tariff system, under a law known as the 'EEG' (Erneuerbare Energien Gesetz) which resulted in explosive growth of PV installations in Germany. At the outset the FIT was over 3x the retail price or 8x the industrial price. The principle behind the German system is a 20 year flat rate contract. The value of new contracts is programmed to decrease each year, in order to encourage the industry to pass on lower costs to the end users. The programme has been more successful than expected with over 1GW installed in 2006, and political pressure is mounting to decrease the tariff to lessen the future burden on consumers.

Subsequently Spain, Italy, Greece and France introduced feed-in tariffs. None have replicated the programmed decrease of FIT in new contracts though, making the German incentive relatively less and less attractive compared to other countries. The French FIT offers a uniquely high premium (EUR 0.55/kWh) for building integrated systems. California, Greece, France and Italy have 30-50% more insolation than Germany making them financially more attractive.

In 2006 California approved the 'California Solar Initiative', offering a choice of investment subsidies or FIT for small and medium systems and a FIT for large systems. The small-system FIT of $0.39 per kWh (far less than EU countries) expires in just 5 years, and the alternate "EPBB" residential investment incentive is modest, averaging perhaps 20% of cost. All California incentives are scheduled to decrease in the future depending as a function of the amount of PV capacity installed.

At the end of 2006, the Ontario Power Authority (Canada) began its Standard Offer Program, the first in North America for small renewable projects (10MW or less). This guarantees a fixed price of $0.42 CDN per kWh over a period of twenty years. Unlike net metering, all the electricity produced is sold to the OPA at the SOP rate. The generator then purchases any needed electricity at the current prevailing rate (e.g., $0.055 per kWh). The difference should cover all the costs of installation and operation over the life of the contract.

The price per kilowatt hour or per peak kilowatt of the FIT or investment subsidies is only one of three factors that stimulate the installation of PV. The other two factors are insolation (the more sunshine, the less capital is needed for a given power output) and administrative ease of obtaining permits and contracts.

Unfortunately the complexity of approvals in California, Spain and Italy has prevented comparable growth to Germany even though the return on investment is better.

In some countries, additional incentives are offered for BIPV compared to stand alone PV.

• France + EUR 0.25/kWh (EUR 0.30 + 0.25 = 0.55/kWh total)
• Italy + EUR 0.04-0.09 kWh
• Germany + EUR 0.05/kWh (facades only)

Environmental impacts

Unlike fossil fuel based technologies, solar power does not lead to any harmful emissions during operation, but the production of the panels leads to some amount of pollution. Also, placement of photovoltaics affects the environment. If they are located where photosynthesizing plants would normally grow, they simply substitute one potentially renewable resource (biomass) for another. It should be noted, however, that the biomass cycle converts solar radiation energy to electrical energy with significantly less efficiency than photovoltaic cells alone. And if they are placed on the sides of buildings (such as in Manchester) or fences, or rooftops (as long as plants would not normally be placed there), or in the desert they are purely additive to the renewable power base.

Greenhouse gases

Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions are now in the range of 25-32 g/kWh and this could decrease to 15 g/kWh in the future. For comparison, a combined cycle gas-fired power plant emits some 400 g/kWh and a coal-fired power plant 915 g/kWh and with carbon capture and storage some 200 g/kWh. Nuclear power emits 25 g/kWh on average; only wind power is better with a mere 11 g/kWh.

It is worth noting, however, that since net carbon emissions into the biosphere can only occur from the input of carbon from an outside source; such as the input and subsequent combustion of fossil fuels that were previously buried deep underground; that in a system entirely powered by renewable energy (that is with no utilization of fossil fuels at all) most renewable energy sources including solar, wind, nuclear, hydroelectric, tidal, bioenergy/biomass/biofuels, and geothermal power would produce no net carbon emissions whatsoever.

Cadmium

One issue that has often raised concerns is the use of cadmium in Cadmium telluride (CdTe) modules (CdTe is only used in a few types of PV panels). Cadmium in its metallic form is a toxic substance that has the tendency to accumulate in ecological food chains. The amount of cadmium used in PV modules is relatively small (5-10 g/m²) and with proper emission control techniques in place the cadmium emissions from module production can be almost zero. Current PV technologies lead to cadmium emissions of 0.3-0.9 microgram/kWh over the whole life-cycle. Most of these emissions actually arise through the use of coal power for the manufacturing of the modules, and coal and lignite combustion leads to much higher emissions of cadmium. Life-cycle cadmium emissions from coal is 3.1 microgram/kWh, lignite 6.2, and natural gas 0.2 microgram/kWh.

Note that if electricity produced by photovoltaic panels were used to manufacture the modules instead of electricity from burning coal, cadmium emissions from coal power usage in the manufacturing process could be entirely eliminated.

Energy Payback Time and Energy Returned on Energy Invested

The energy payback time is the time required to produce an amount of energy as great as what was consumed during production. The energy payback time is determined from a life cycle analysis of energy.

Another key indicator of environmental performance, tightly related to the energy payback time, is the ratio of electricity generated divided by the energy required to build and maintain the equipment. This ratio is called the energy returned on energy invested (EROEI). Of course, little is gained if it takes as much energy to produce the modules as they produce in their lifetimes. This should not be confused with the economic return on investment, which varies according to local energy prices, subsidies available and metering techniques.

A review life cycle energy analysis of the three types of photovoltaic (PV) materials that make up the majority of the active solar market (single crystal silicon, polycrystalline silicon, and amorphous silicon) found that solar cells pay for themselves in terms of energy in a few years (1-5 years):

• Crystalline silicon PV systems presently have energy pay-back times of 1.5-2 years for South-European locations and 2.7-3.5 years for Middle-European locations. For silicon technology clear prospects for a reduction of energy input exist, and an energy pay-back of 1 year may be possible within a few years.
• Thin film technologies now have energy pay-back times in the range of 1-1.5 years (S.Europe). With lifetimes of such systems of at least 30 years, the EROEI is in the range of 10 to 30.

They thus generate enough energy over their lifetimes to reproduce themselves many times (6-31 reproductions, the EROEI is a bit lower) depending on what type of material, balance of system (or BOS), and the geographic location of the system.

Advantages

• The 89 petawatts of sunlight reaching the earth's surface is plentiful - almost 6,000 times more - compared to the 15 terawatts of average power consumed by humans. Additionally, solar electric generation has the highest power density (global mean of 170 W/m²) among renewable energies.
• Solar power is pollution free during use. Production end wastes and emissions are manageable using existing pollution controls. End-of-use recycling technologies are under development.
• Facilities can operate with little maintenance or intervention after initial setup.
• Solar electric generation is economically superior where grid connection or fuel transport is difficult, costly or impossible. Examples include satellites, island communities, remote locations and ocean vessels.
• When grid-connected, solar electric generation can displace the highest cost electricity during times of peak demand (in most climatic regions), can reduce grid loading, and can eliminate the need for local battery power for use in times of darkness and high local demand; such application is encouraged by net metering. Time-of-use net metering can be highly favorable to small photovoltaic systems.
• Grid-connected solar electricity can be used locally thus reducing transmission/distribution losses (transmission losses were approximately 7.2% in 1995).
• Once the initial capital cost of building a solar power plant has been spent, operating costs are extremely low compared to existing power technologies.

Disadvantages

• Solar electricity can sometimes be more expensive than electricity generated by other sources.
• Solar electricity is not available at night and may be less available due to weather conditions (solar panels generated reduced amounts of power in some types of inclement weather;) therefore, a storage or complementary power system is required.
• Limited power density: Average daily insolation in the contiguous U.S. is 3-7 kW·h/m² and on average lower in Europe.
• Solar cells produce DC which must be converted to AC (using a grid tie inverter) when used in currently existing distribution grids. This incurs an energy loss of 4-12%.

Photovoltaics companies

See also: List of photovoltaics companies

Major photovoltaics companies include BP Solar, Yingli Green Energy, Kyocera, Q-Cells, Sanyo, Sharp Solar, SolarWorld, SunPower, and Suntech.

BP has been involved in solar power since 1973 and its subsidiary, BP Solar, is now one of the world's largest solar power companies with production facilities in the United States, Spain, India and Australia, employing a workforce of over 2,000 people worldwide. BP solar is a major worldwide manufacturer and installer of photovoltaic solar cells for electricity. The company has begun constructing two new solar photovoltaic (PV) solar cell manufacturing plants, one at its European headquarters in Tres Cantos, Madrid, and the second at its joint venture facility, Tata BP Solar, in Bangalore, India.

Yingli Green Energy is one of the leading vertically integrated photovoltaic (PV) product manufacturers in China. Yingli Green Energy is currently one of the largest manufacturers of PV products in China as measured by annual production capacity, with an annual production capacity of 200 megawatts of polysilicon ingots and wafers, 200 megawatts of PV cells and 200 megawatts of PV modules, as of July 2007. Yingli Green Energy sells PV modules under its own brand name, Yingli Solar, to PV system integrators and distributors located in various markets around the world, including Germany, Spain, China and the United States.

Kyocera Corporation has announced a plan to increase its solar cell production to 500 MW per year in 2010. 500 MW is about three times the current output of 180 MW, and the company will reinforce production bases in Japan, the US, Europe and China, investing a total of about ¥30 billion through FY2010. Through this production enhancement, Kyocera looks to meet increasing demand across the world for solar cells.

Q-Cells is the world's second largest cell manufacturer, based in Thalheim, Germany.

Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) is based in Norway, and was established in 1996. Over a relatively short period, REC has become the world's largest producer of polysilicon and wafers for PV applications. REC is involved in all steps of the value chain, from production of solar grade silicon to wafer, cell and module production. The company has customers all over the globe and seven production plants in three different countries. It operates on three different continents and has approximately 1,100 employees.

Sanyo Electric produced $213 million worth of solar cells at its plant in Hungary in 2006, and expects to triple its production capacity to 720,000 units in 2008.

Sharp Solar is the world's largest photovoltaic module and cell manufacturer, which manufactures in Japan, and near Wrexham, UK. Sharp Solar produces both single and multi-crystalline solar cells which are used for many applications, from satellites to lighthouses, and industrial applications to residential use. Sharp began researching solar cells in 1959 with mass production first beginning in 1963. Production capacity amounted to 324 MW in 2004.

SolarWorld is headquartered in Bonn, Germany, and purchased Shell Solar's crystalline silicon activities in 2006.

Suntech Power is based in Wuxi, China, where construction of a 1 GW module plant has begun. Year-end production capacity for 2007 is expected to be 480 MW.

United Solar Ovonic, a wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Conversion Devices Ovonics currently employs 700 people and expects to increase its production of thin-film amorphous photovoltaics from 117 MW/yr at the end of 2007 to over 300 MW/yr by the end of 2010. They are best known for producing building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) roofing systems (roofing shingle photovoltaics) and continuous roll-to-roll manufacturing of thin-film amorphous silicon alloy multi-junction solar cells.

Nanosolar, a private company, has been named Innovator of the Year for 2007 by Popular Science Magazine, in connection with its PowerSheet flexible solar film. Nanosolar manufactures PowerSheet by printing a solar-activated ink onto metal sheets in a low-cost, continuous process. Nanosolar is building a plant in San Jose, CA and one near Berlin, Germany. It promises to deliver solar film that will be low enough in cost to be at cost parity with power from the electrical grid.

WS Energia[8] , The DoubleSun system, developed by WS Energia, duplicates the energy production of commercial PV modules with a reliable, easy to make, easy to build solar concentrator. Combining the benefits of solar concentration, provided through flat metallic mirrors, with the benefits of solar tracking systems, provided by state of the art solar trackers.

Solar Systems,is constructing a 154MW HCPV Heliostat Concentrator Photovoltaic solar power station in Victoria, Australia. It will use Boeing Spectrolab GaAs photovoltaic triple junction cells having 30% efficiency. An active cooling system keeps the cells at 60 degrees celsius, their optimum operating temperature.

Teksolar a specialist technical consultancy firm established in the year 2000 that focuses on providing goal-orientated advice and expert analysis to institutions in the photovoltaics (PV) industry.

Photovoltaic Industry Associations

• ASIF: Spanish PV Industry Associationin Spanish only
• SER: french renewable energy Industry organization in french only
• BSW: German Solar Industry Associationin German, with English summary
• Canadian Solar industry Association
• EPIA: European Photovoltaic Industry association
• JPEA: Japanese Photovoltaic Energy Association in Japanese only
• SEIA: Solar Energy Industries Association US trade association of solar energy manufacturers, dealers, distributors, contractors
• SEMI: Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International Global industry association with offices in Austin, Beijing, Brussels, Hsinchu, Moscow, San Jose (Calif.), Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore, Tokyo and Washington, D.C.

Photovoltaics research institutes

There are many research institutions and departments at universities around the world who are active in photovoltaics research. Countries which are particularly active include Germany, Spain, Japan, Australia, China, and the USA.

Some universities and institutes which have a photovoltaics research department.

• National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL
• Energy & Environmental Technology Application Center at the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering SUNY at Albany
• Institut für Solare Energiesysteme ISE at the Fraunhofer Institute
• Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN)
• Imperial College London: Experimental Solid State Physics
• Instituto de Energía Solar, at Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
• Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology, at Loughborough University
• School of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy Engineering at The University of New South Wales
• Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems at the Australian National University
• Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Prof. Graetzel invented dye sensitized cells here
• Advanced Energy Systems at Helsinki University of Technology
• Institute of Materials Research, Salford Univrsity]
• The Centre for Electronic Devices and Materials at Sheffield Hallam University
• The Solar Caliometry Lab at Queen's University
• Institute of microtechnology at University of Neuchatel Switzerland
• University of Konstanz
• Arizona State University Photovoltaic Testing Laboratory
• Institute of Energy Conversion at University of Delaware
• World Alliance for Decentralized Energy
• Florida Solar Energy Center at University of Central Florida
• Linz Institute for Organic Solar Cells (LIOS)

See also

• Active solar
• Deployment of solar power to energy grids
• Electranet
• Green technology
• Grid-tied electrical system
• High efficiency solar cells
• Islanding
• Microgeneration
• Photoelectrochemical cell
• Photovoltaic and renewable energy engineering in Australia
• Photovoltaics in transport
• Renewable energy
• Renewable energy in the European Union
• Solar car
• Solar thermal energy
• Solar energy
• Solar cell
• Solar panel

External links

Publicly funded free data sources

• EU PV Technology Platform - forum for stakeholders to influence EU policy,
• PV Status Report 2006 : Comprehensive global overview by Arnulf Jager-Waldau, European Commission.
• Trends in photovoltaic applications in selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2004
• http://www.iea-pvps.org/products/download/rep_ar06.pdf IEA PVPS annual report 2006
• Information pertaining to photovoltaic solar electricity in each of the IEA PVPS member countries
• US Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
• DSIRE Listing of US state, local, utility, and federal incentives for renewable energy and energy efficiency.
• Energy Saving Trust (UK) - What is Solar electricity?
• Find Solar US solar estimator and solar pro locator (joint partnership with DOE).

Trade Press and commercial databases

• Solarbuzz Online news
• Photon International International PV magazine, also has local editions for Germany and Spain
• Renewable Energy World magazine covers PV among other forms of renewable energy
• ENF Ltd PV Market Research and Industry Directory
• Home Power Magazine
• New York Times ongoing series on moving to a clean energy future

Others

• solar-is-future.com - Information about Solar Power and Photovoltaics
• Information about Solar Energy in Italy
• Live monitoring see also Google Solar Panel Project
• Real-Time Performance Diagnostics
• Lu, Boi (2003). "Power Consumption of a Home". The Physics Factbook.
• How Stuff Works: Solar cells.
• Photovoltaics
• Energy Atlas of the West
• World's largest photovoltaic power plants
• World’s largest solar power plant being built in eastern Germany
• Global Solar Completed 1.4 MW Solar Power Station; Signs Agreement to Enlarge System to 2.4 MW
• Online calculation

• Plastic solar panels reach 6% efficiency