Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Headlinersuk: Difference between revisions
Vote delete |
Ollybenson (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
'''Keep''' The [[BBC]] seems an adequate source. The article should perhaps be renamed ''Headliners'' which seems to be the proper name of the organisation. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 13:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
'''Keep''' The [[BBC]] seems an adequate source. The article should perhaps be renamed ''Headliners'' which seems to be the proper name of the organisation. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 13:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
:'''Comment''' The BBC is an excellent source, however ''non-trivial'' coverage is required, and whilst the article claims coverage, it provides no evidence of that coverage, and I have been unable to find any myself. [[User:Mayalld|Mayalld]] ([[User talk:Mayalld|talk]]) 13:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
:'''Comment''' The BBC is an excellent source, however ''non-trivial'' coverage is required, and whilst the article claims coverage, it provides no evidence of that coverage, and I have been unable to find any myself. [[User:Mayalld|Mayalld]] ([[User talk:Mayalld|talk]]) 13:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
::'''Comment''' There is a link thru to the work Headliners did with BBC Northern Ireland in the recent work section [[User:Ollybenson|Ollybenson]] ([[User talk:Ollybenson|talk]]) 13:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
'''Delete''' The fact that an article for [[Children's Express]] is neither here nor there ([[WP:WAX]]), in any case, the Chilren's Express article refers to the now-defunct US organisation. While it is a worthy organisation and has had some coverage I do not believe it is significant coverage as per [[WP:N]]. [[User:BlinkingBlimey|BlinkingBlimey]] ([[User talk:BlinkingBlimey|talk]]) 13:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
'''Delete''' The fact that an article for [[Children's Express]] is neither here nor there ([[WP:WAX]]), in any case, the Chilren's Express article refers to the now-defunct US organisation. While it is a worthy organisation and has had some coverage I do not believe it is significant coverage as per [[WP:N]]. [[User:BlinkingBlimey|BlinkingBlimey]] ([[User talk:BlinkingBlimey|talk]]) 13:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 13:51, 7 January 2008
Delete NN organisation. All sources self-published Mayalld (talk) 12:22, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Please explain yourself What is a NN organisation? Why does an entry exist for Children's Express, our former name, but you won't allow one for our current name? Ollybenson (talk) 12:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment NN = not notable. Mayalld (talk) 12:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Keep The BBC seems an adequate source. The article should perhaps be renamed Headliners which seems to be the proper name of the organisation. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment The BBC is an excellent source, however non-trivial coverage is required, and whilst the article claims coverage, it provides no evidence of that coverage, and I have been unable to find any myself. Mayalld (talk) 13:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment There is a link thru to the work Headliners did with BBC Northern Ireland in the recent work section Ollybenson (talk) 13:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete The fact that an article for Children's Express is neither here nor there (WP:WAX), in any case, the Chilren's Express article refers to the now-defunct US organisation. While it is a worthy organisation and has had some coverage I do not believe it is significant coverage as per WP:N. BlinkingBlimey (talk) 13:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)