Jump to content

Talk:Time immemorial: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Wrong; 'is said to have' is in this context used because this is the generally ASSUMED date, but the exact one is not known because it was never explicitly specified as such. If you had bothered to search any references on the subject of English heraldic law, you would have discovered this. [[User:65.13.28.4|65.13.28.4]] 19:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Wrong; 'is said to have' is in this context used because this is the generally ASSUMED date, but the exact one is not known because it was never explicitly specified as such. If you had bothered to search any references on the subject of English heraldic law, you would have discovered this. [[User:65.13.28.4|65.13.28.4]] 19:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
:Then put those references in the article!
:Then put those references in the article!
::now, now children..

Revision as of 15:01, 31 January 2008

WikiProject iconHeraldry and vexillology Stub‑class
WikiProject iconTime immemorial is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Second point: "The Court of Chivalry is said to have defined the period before 1066 as "time immemorial" for the purposes of heraldry." The "is said to have" sounds like classic weasel wording to me. 68.39.174.238 17:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong; 'is said to have' is in this context used because this is the generally ASSUMED date, but the exact one is not known because it was never explicitly specified as such. If you had bothered to search any references on the subject of English heraldic law, you would have discovered this. 65.13.28.4 19:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then put those references in the article!
now, now children..