User talk:Paulinho28: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:46, 6 February 2008

It is suspected that this user has used one or more accounts abusively.
The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended.
See block log and lists of suspected and confirmed accounts.

Template:Do not delete Template:Do not delete

February 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. - Philippe | Talk 00:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paulinho28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have you blocked me for a week? Can't I write anything on my personal page? Anyway I didn't knew that, so please unblock me and I will not do it anymore

Decline reason:

No, you may not. And this was well beyond the line. — Yamla (talk) 01:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paulinho28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me! I promise that I won't do it anymore.

Decline reason:

As you are just returning from a block for similar personal attacks, I can't see why you shouldn't sit out the remainder of this block. Kuru ^talk 03:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And evading the block...

...evading the block isn't a good idea either. It's the sort of thing that gets your block extended or reset. Using an IP to edit during a block is unacceptable. - Philippe | Talk 19:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And the content of those edits are the sort of thing that are likely to lead to an indefinite ban from editing, and perhaps more serious consequences. --Yamla (talk) 19:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="width: 80%;"
 |-
@@ Line 20: / Line 19: @@
 ...evading the block isn't a good idea either.  It's the sort of thing that gets your block extended or reset.  Using an IP to edit during a block is unacceptable.  - [[User:Philippe|Philippe]] &#124; [[User talk:Philippe|Talk]] 19:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
+:And the content of those edits are the sort of thing that are likely to lead to an indefinite ban from editing, and perhaps more serious consequences.  --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 19:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)