Talk:Gesias Cavalcante: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:30, 15 June 2008

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

Brazil Unassessed

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The articles of Gesias Calvancante and Shinya Aoki are disgustingly biased in favour of Aoki. These POV articles need to be fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.188.60 (talk) 09:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and fix them then. --David from Downunder (talk) 19:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you kidding? A friend of mine already tried fixing them and I saw what you did. You misinterpreted everything he wrote or just plain put words in his mouth, then you ran around gathering info from random (unreliable) sources to support any claim but his and now the article is full of lies and complete nonsense, all the while you claim it is all perfect due to following wikipedia policies. Then I guess wikipedia policies allows lies then. No one has time to fix any article with people like you around who are willing to spend hours looking up any shady sources just to support your point of view. Thanks to guys like you, wikipedia can never be a reliable source for information. 99.237.188.60 (talk) 05:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly do you think is wrong in this article? From what i gather everything is correct and non-biased: the referee stopped the fight because he though something illegal was done, the doctor announced Aoki was unable to continue and it was ruled a NC... How is that nothing but unbiased facts? Even if the elbows didn't hit Aokis neck, the fight was stopped because the referee THOUGH it did, so that's what is written in the article. I don't think you can write anything else without it being speculation..aktsu (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See it for yourself and you tell me what's wrong. 99.237.188.60 (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Who are you kidding? A friend of mine already tried fixing them and I saw what you did. You misinterpreted everything he wrote or just plain put words in his mouth, then you ran around gathering info from random (unreliable) sources to support any claim but his and now the article is full of lies and complete nonsense, all the while you claim it is all perfect due to following wikipedia policies. Then I guess wikipedia policies allows lies then. No one has time to fix any article with people like you around who are willing to spend hours looking up any shady sources just to support your point of view. Thanks to guys like you, wikipedia can never be a reliable source for information. [[Special:Contributions/99.237.188.60|99.237.188.60]] ([[User talk:99.237.188.60|talk]]) 05:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 :What exactly do you think is wrong in this article? From what i gather everything is correct and non-biased: the referee stopped the fight because he though something illegal was done, the doctor announced Aoki was unable to continue and it was ruled a NC... How is that nothing but unbiased facts? Even if the elbows didn't hit Aokis neck, the fight was stopped because the referee THOUGH it did, so that's what is written in the article. I don't think you can write anything else without it being speculation..[[User:Aktsu|aktsu]] ([[User talk:Aktsu|talk]]) 05:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
+See it for yourself and you tell me what's wrong. [[Special:Contributions/99.237.188.60|99.237.188.60]] ([[User talk:99.237.188.60|talk]]) 05:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)