Talk:HJ-8: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:12, 10 September 2008

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Chinese Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Comments

There must be a mistake regarding armor penetration of the HJ-8. The writer must've meant 1000mm instead of 100mm, as most modern antitank weapons have far more than 100mm penetration.

Image

you can use this picture.

Thanks

kullanıcı:KIZILSUNGUR

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{WPMILHIST
+{{WPMILHIST|class=Start
+|Chinese=yes
-|class=Start
+|Weaponry=yes
 }}