Jump to content

User talk:99.165.237.233: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 12: Line 12:
== Dear Daedalus ==
== Dear Daedalus ==
You asked me to provide diffs. I interpret these diffs to support my contentions that [[User:Wikidea]] vandalized the [[Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration]]. Here they are: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Economic_policy_of_the_George_W._Bush_administration&diff=227105980&oldid=225293033]. The user added the category Market failure, a category which has to do with economic theory with a few actual failures of markets mixed in. He also included the category Government failure which does not exist. He pulled his little joke 2½ months ago, and never bothered to withdraw it. I think a scolding by an anonymous user is the ''least'' of what his conduct deserves. But I've noticed few administrators care about vandalism when the subject favors liberal positions even when it clearly damages the reputation of Wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/99.165.237.233|99.165.237.233]] ([[User talk:99.165.237.233#top|talk]]) 04:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
You asked me to provide diffs. I interpret these diffs to support my contentions that [[User:Wikidea]] vandalized the [[Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration]]. Here they are: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Economic_policy_of_the_George_W._Bush_administration&diff=227105980&oldid=225293033]. The user added the category Market failure, a category which has to do with economic theory with a few actual failures of markets mixed in. He also included the category Government failure which does not exist. He pulled his little joke 2½ months ago, and never bothered to withdraw it. I think a scolding by an anonymous user is the ''least'' of what his conduct deserves. But I've noticed few administrators care about vandalism when the subject favors liberal positions even when it clearly damages the reputation of Wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/99.165.237.233|99.165.237.233]] ([[User talk:99.165.237.233#top|talk]]) 04:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
:Well, even in warnings, you should provide diffs. I haven't looked that far in the history, but it looks as if he has not re-added them. Now, as to why admins appear to not care, this user was actually blocked for personal attacks, and besides that, one is supposed to warn a user with a maximum of four times before they will accept the report at [[WP:AIV]].— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup> /<sub>[[User:Daedalus969/RR|Improve]]</sub>''' 04:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)



[[Image:Information.png|25px]] The <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_policy_of_the_George_W._Bush_administration?diff=243360336 recent edit]</span> you made to [[:Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration]] constitutes [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]], and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggledelete2 --> &nbsp; — [[User:Jeff G.|Jeff G.]] ([[User:Jeff G./talk|talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Jeff G.|contribs]]) 04:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Information.png|25px]] The <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_policy_of_the_George_W._Bush_administration?diff=243360336 recent edit]</span> you made to [[:Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration]] constitutes [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]], and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggledelete2 --> &nbsp; — [[User:Jeff G.|Jeff G.]] ([[User:Jeff G./talk|talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Jeff G.|contribs]]) 04:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:52, 6 October 2008

August 28 warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ann Coulter. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Cool Hand Luke 07:48, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bush Debt Increases-Economic Strategery

I don't know what you are talking about. What edit do you mean? I usually have added to these articles. But anyway, Bush is destroying this country, which is obvious to anybody that isn't a complete moron. The debt relative to GDP has increased dramatically under his administration. And real income for 96% of the population has declined. His tax cuts took surpluses and created massive deficits. His incompetent running of the Iraq War may have bankrupted this country. So nice job supporting him! You probably think tax cuts actually increase government revenues, which study after study indicates is baloney. Please feel free to continue voting Republican, which anyone who actually takes the time to read the news would not do. There is no context, no excuse for his unbelievable incompetence. And you must know absolutely nothing about the economy to make a comment like that. So stay off my pageFarcaster (talk) 03:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Wikidea. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Do not throw accusations at people unless you can provide evidence, in the form of diffsdαlus Contribs /Improve 03:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Dear Daedalus

You asked me to provide diffs. I interpret these diffs to support my contentions that User:Wikidea vandalized the Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration. Here they are: [1]. The user added the category Market failure, a category which has to do with economic theory with a few actual failures of markets mixed in. He also included the category Government failure which does not exist. He pulled his little joke 2½ months ago, and never bothered to withdraw it. I think a scolding by an anonymous user is the least of what his conduct deserves. But I've noticed few administrators care about vandalism when the subject favors liberal positions even when it clearly damages the reputation of Wikipedia. 99.165.237.233 (talk) 04:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, even in warnings, you should provide diffs. I haven't looked that far in the history, but it looks as if he has not re-added them. Now, as to why admins appear to not care, this user was actually blocked for personal attacks, and besides that, one is supposed to warn a user with a maximum of four times before they will accept the report at WP:AIV.— dαlus Contribs /Improve 04:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The recent edit you made to Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]