Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whers: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m cross out double sig
TexasAndroid (talk | contribs)
Line 10: Line 10:


To summarise, this article should be deleted as the topic doesn't meet [[WP:N]] and the content shouldn't be merged anywhere unless it has been verified through reliable sources. '''[[User:Themfromspace|<font color="blue">Them</font>]][[User talk:Themfromspace|<font color="red">From</font>]][[Special:Contributions/themfromspace|<font color="black">Space</font>]]''' 20:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
To summarise, this article should be deleted as the topic doesn't meet [[WP:N]] and the content shouldn't be merged anywhere unless it has been verified through reliable sources. '''[[User:Themfromspace|<font color="blue">Them</font>]][[User talk:Themfromspace|<font color="red">From</font>]][[Special:Contributions/themfromspace|<font color="black">Space</font>]]''' 20:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional elements|list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—[[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] ([[User talk:TexasAndroid|talk]]) 20:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction|list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—[[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] ([[User talk:TexasAndroid|talk]]) 20:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 20:59, 27 May 2009

Whers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article is primarily original research which can not be fixed since I have found no adequate sources that discuss this. Under our verifiability policy, Articles should be based upon reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. A google search, and a google news search each show a lack of the reliable sources needed to back up the article.

Furthermore, the topic "Whers" doesn't meet our notability guidelines as it has not been significantly commented upon in reliable, third-party sources. Without this we cannot ascertain the significance of the subject matter. This follows from WP:V as it's impossible to have a notable article on a topic which can not be verified.

In accordance with our deletion policy, this article should be deleted because it is an article for which all attempts to find reliable sources to verify it has failed, it is an article whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline, and it is an article with only content not suitable for an encyclopedia (see WP:NOT#OR, and WP:IINFO)

To summarise, this article should be deleted as the topic doesn't meet WP:N and the content shouldn't be merged anywhere unless it has been verified through reliable sources. ThemFromSpace 20:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]