User talk:MOOOOOPS

Email me.

Arlington County Auxiliary Article

What what you consider proof of the update to the ACPD auxiliary article? All of the information contained therein is a matter of public record, including the fact that the program is dealing with two ADA claims, the fact that our numbers are way down, and that officers are leaving due to management issues. Thus, all of the information in the update we supplied is verifiable; the standard is "verifiable," not "requires proof prior to posting."

Ericbonetti (talk) 12:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:45, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Moooops,

Again, with all due respect, the standard enunciated by Wikipedia is "verifiable," not "proven in advance." If the latter were the standard, 95% of all content on Wikipedia would be removed. It is important that you not attempt to supplant Wikipedia's standards with your own.

Can you show me where such Wikipedia announces the guidelines you have articulated? As an officer with the department, I would be grateful if you could prove that this is indeed the standard. You claim it to be the standard, but I have not seen any proof and do not believe your claim to be accurate. Indeed, the standard is:

"Any material lacking a reliable source may be removed, but editors might object if you remove material without giving them sufficient time to provide references, and it has always been good practice, and expected behavior of Wikipedia editors (in line with our editing policy), to make reasonable efforts to find sources oneself that support such material, and cite them.Ericbonetti (talk) 01:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 02:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: New York City Police Department edit

There was nothing untoward about my comment it was quiet truthful, I was only pointing out that unfortunately a large number of police officers are overweight and that this is not only effecting their performance but also our safety. You say my comment "did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted" this is only in your eyes and a truthful information about a public body, no matter if it is negative should be allowed.

Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Murphy

Drafted as a third baseman, used as a second basemen during winter leagues, has only played first base since outfield troubles, he is an infielder. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 03:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 04:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

It is not proper to list him as an outfielder, have you considered that maybe the Mets have just not updated their website, and that it is our duty to go and provide the world with accurate information? Simply put Murphy is a first baseman, as Sports Management Student, he projects as a first baseman, and will be there as his career continues, barring a monumental grasp of second base. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 05:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 05:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

If there was an official mathematics website, and it said 1+1=41, and there was a Wikipedia article that said 1+1=2, would you change it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 05:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 05:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

As a prelaw student I understand ethics, and proving things, but this is the correct information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Solution

I propose maybe adding a utility man feature on the template, or maybe contacting the mets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 05:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 05:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

TBTA "Police" article

The purpose for my edit of the TBTA Police article is due to the misinformation which is clearly stated within the article. I cited my sources according to New York State law when I stated that the TBTA law enforcement division was not made of New York State authorized Police Officers. TBTA Officers go through a 3 month training acadamey while Statewide the standards to become a police officer in New York are 6 months. TBTA Officers Geographic Area of Employment is NOT the entire State of New York (as in currently stated on the page), they are assigned to work on the bridges and tunnels of the City of New York. New York State Law gives them enforcement authority as Peace Officers, which allows them to function in some aspects as regular police do; however, this is limited when they are off duty and off of their property. For example, if a woman in Albany NY were yelling to an off duty TBTA Officer that a man just raped her (Felony crime) and she gave the TBTA Peace officer a description of the perpetrator, the peace officer would not be able to make a probable cause arrest based on that description, he wold only be empowered to make such an arrest if the crime was in fact committed in his presence. This is a major difference between police and peace officer in the state of New York and it is important to distinguish this difference in a an encyclopedia which takes an authoritative tone, the interested public who would look up this article would be also be interested to know how a Peace Officer of the TBTA could assist them and in what capacity they can perform their duties. I cited my comments and do not think I disrespected the TBTA in any way; I simply made it clear their functions and the limitations of such functions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchangelsSword (talk • contribs) 15:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

It's Moors!

Just FYI. –xeno^talk 20:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

LMAO MOOOOOPS! MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Humane law enforcement

I have nominated Humane law enforcement, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humane law enforcement. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:NYC Sanitation Police badge.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NYC Sanitation Police badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 07:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

New York City Human Resources Administration Police

I see you've put them as peace officers - I can't find them in 2.20 so I can only assume they're special patrolmen? ninety:one (reply on my talk) 20:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I read that as all being HHC. Will make corrections. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 22:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Your welcome. I also read that the same way as you the first few times I read the CPL. MOOOOOPS (talk) 00:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

lapd page

There is still vandelism on the LAPD page, see the "village" and the abbreviation of the LAPD was changed to SOS... I dont really know how to edit wiki pages well... was hoping someone who edited in the past would fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.153.145 (talk) 01:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I edited the page and removed the vandalism. MOOOOOPS (talk) 01:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Penn Foster Career School/College

Stop changing the Penn Foster Career School page. And stop changing the Penn Foster College page. The online diploma doesn't work for students who are trying to get a job or go to a university. The school is trying to make a profit off people; the diplomas aren't real. Sweetfornow (talk) 13:34, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

How are my articles NOT meeting Wikipedia's standards? Can you explain without cyberbullying someone? Or do you have no manners online? Sweetfornow (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)