Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowcovered: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Orangemike (talk | contribs) reasoning |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{findsources|Snowcovered}}) |
:({{findsources|Snowcovered}}) |
||
[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]] | [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 21:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC) |
[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]] | [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 21:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
The article should not be deleted, because it is a) a description of a prominent technology company; b) includes relevant academic citations and sources; and c) forms part of technology and entrepreneurship series of articles. |
|||
Revision as of 21:59, 30 October 2009
- Snowcovered (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Non-notable company; judging from the talk page, author considers this interesting and is creating this and other articles as a coatrack on which to hang his/her original research. – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Orange Mike | Talk 21:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC) The article should not be deleted, because it is a) a description of a prominent technology company; b) includes relevant academic citations and sources; and c) forms part of technology and entrepreneurship series of articles.