Jump to content

Wikipedia:Unsuccessful adminship candidacies/P: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
JamieS93 (talk | contribs)
m fix
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Patricknoddy|Patricknoddy]], 16 February 2007 - withdrawn by admin [[User:Majorly|Majorly]] at (1/13/0)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Patricknoddy|Patricknoddy]], 16 February 2007 - withdrawn by admin [[User:Majorly|Majorly]] at (1/13/0)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pattav2|Pattav2]], 4 November 2008 - closed by [[User:Aervanath]] at (0/1/1)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pattav2|Pattav2]], 4 November 2008 - closed by [[User:Aervanath]] at (0/1/1)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Paul2387|Paul2387]], 30 November 2009 - closed per [[WP:NOTNOW]] by [[User:Triplestop|Triplestop]] at (0/5/0)
*:[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Paul2387 2|Paul2387]], 14 December 2009 - withdrawn by candidate at (0/3/0)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]], 15 July 2006 - withdrawn by candidate at (10/19/7)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]], 15 July 2006 - withdrawn by candidate at (10/19/7)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/PaulWicks|PaulWicks]], 15 September 2006 - withdrawn by candidate at (1/12/3)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/PaulWicks|PaulWicks]], 15 September 2006 - withdrawn by candidate at (1/12/3)

Revision as of 15:33, 14 December 2009

This page lists failed discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship that were started after April 2004, which is when requests for adminships started being listed on separate pages. The links below are of nominations for candidates whose usernames began with the letter P at the time of their first nomination, and nominations that followed are included where known.

A summary of the reason for the unsuccessful candidacy is included in most cases:

  • failed means the candidate received fewer support than oppose votes;
  • consensus not reached means the candidate received at least as many support as oppose votes, but support was deemed by bureaucrats to be insufficient;
  • withdrawn by bureaucrat usually means that a bureaucrat judged that the nomination could not have succeeded at the time of withdrawal;
  • withdrawn by candidate and all other reasons. No inference should be drawn from this wording. If you want to know exactly why the nominee was not promoted, follow the nominee's RfA link.

See also: List of failed RfAs (Chronological)