Jump to content

Wikipedia:Unsuccessful adminship candidacies/T: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 122: Line 122:
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tinkleheimer|Tinkleheimer]], 9 June 2008 - withdrawn by candidate at (15/16/8)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tinkleheimer|Tinkleheimer]], 9 June 2008 - withdrawn by candidate at (15/16/8)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TioChaka|TioChaka]], 9 June 2007 - withdrawn per [[WP:SNOW]] by [[User:EVula|EVula]] at (0/11/1)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TioChaka|TioChaka]], 9 June 2007 - withdrawn per [[WP:SNOW]] by [[User:EVula|EVula]] at (0/11/1)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tiptoety|Tiptoety]], 31 August 2007 - withdrawn by admin [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|Ryan Postlethwaite]] at (1/9/3)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tiptoety|Tiptoety]], 31 August 2007 - closed per [[WP:SNOW]] [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|Ryan Postlethwaite]] at (1/9/3)
*:[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tiptoety 2|Tiptoety]], 7 November 2007 - withdrawn by [[User:Wikidudeman|Wikidudeman]] at (18/27/10)
*:[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tiptoety 2|Tiptoety]], 7 November 2007 - closed per [[WP:SNOW]] by [[User:Wikidudeman|Wikidudeman]] at (18/27/10)
*:[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tiptoety 3|Tiptoety]], 2 March 2008 - '''promoted''' (93/8/4)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/tjstrf|tjstrf]], 7 June 2007 - withdrawn by candidate at (52/7/0)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/tjstrf|tjstrf]], 7 June 2007 - withdrawn by candidate at (52/7/0)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tkgd2007|Tkgd2007]], 19 May 2008 - withdrawn at (1/4/1)
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tkgd2007|Tkgd2007]], 19 May 2008 - withdrawn at (1/4/1)

Revision as of 02:10, 15 December 2009

This page lists failed discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship that were started after April 2004, which is when requests for adminships started being listed on separate pages. The links below are of nominations for candidates whose usernames began with the letter T at the time of their first nomination, and nominations that followed are included where known.

A summary of the reason for the unsuccessful candidacy is included in most cases:

  • failed means the candidate received fewer support than oppose votes;
  • consensus not reached means the candidate received at least as many support as oppose votes, but support was deemed by bureaucrats to be insufficient;
  • withdrawn by bureaucrat usually means that a bureaucrat judged that the nomination could not have succeeded at the time of withdrawal;
  • withdrawn by candidate and all other reasons. No inference should be drawn from this wording. If you want to know exactly why the nominee was not promoted, follow the nominee's RfA link.

See also: List of failed RfAs (Chronological)