User talk:Barek

Barek is tired of wikidrama, and has chosen to spend more time in the real world; but may still wander back online occasionally. During this time, replies to queries may be greatly delayed.

Please click here to start a new message at the bottom of this page.
	If you post a message to me here, I will usually reply here - if you want a {{talkback}} notice, please request it. If I left a message for you on your talk page, I have it on my watchlist and will see replies made on your talk page. Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right at my discretion to remove uncivil comments from this page, as well as threads which are perceived by me to be disruptive. My alternate talkpage can be used to contact me if Wikipedia indicates that this page is protected due to vandalism.	Please note: This talk page is known to be monitored by talk page watchers. This means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot respond to quickly is appreciated. Server time (): November 16, 2024 10:14 (UTC)

My talk page archives
• 2007  • 2008  • 2009  • 2010  • 2011  • 2012  • 2013  • 2014  • 2015  • 2016  • 2017  • 2018  • 2019  • 2020  • 2021  • 2022  • 2023  • 2024

Thank you

Thank you for fixing the link on Don Murphy now please fix the other one. That Active Banana is actually quite lazy! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BassandAle (talk • contribs) 05:46, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

We don't appear to have an article on the other one. I considered making it a link to the sub-section of the novel that have a paragraph on the film - but it might be better to wait for the full article to be written. As more news is released, an article is likely to develop quickly. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:3RR

If you read WP:3RR, you will see that reversions of edits by banned users do not count as reverts for the purposes of the three-revert rule. – PeeJay 18:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

I saw sock-puppetry, but didn't realize it was by a banned user. Can you point me to the original user so I can look?

In the meantime, I've protected the article due to what looked like edit-warring. If the IP was a banned user, I have no problem dropping that to semi-protection, but just want to confirm first. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

The original user was User:Jamen Somasu, who we also suspect was a sockpuppet of User:Supersonicx1986. – PeeJay 18:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

I see that there's evidence of sock-puppetry resulting in several blocks, but no actual ban that I can locate; although the way the user is going, he's likely headed to a formal ban if there isn't one. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Ah, my bad. I've confused "blocked" with "banned". Simple mistake. – PeeJay 20:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

bobbinis-kitchen.com

Dear Barek,

in regard to your spam declaration for bobbinis-kitchen.com/quarkkeulchen:

please would you be so kind to explain to me the difference between the empiric example (see url above) and http://www.recipe-recipes-message-board.com/forum/view_topic.php?forum_id=98&id=1276 that is still denoted as a sample on the article quarkkeulchen and not declared as spam??

I do not understand where the linking to a webpage of noncommercial extent like bobinis-kitchen.com/quarkkeulchen breaks the rules of linking. Especially, when the content of this webpage is definetly scientifical and not just entertainment or business.

As far as wikipedia declared, there are anyway no exceptional advantages that any webpage could get by beeing linked to from a wikipedia article.

I would appreciate if we could undo the spam declaration for bobbinis-kitchen.com.

Regards Bonzothedog —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonzothedog (talk • contribs) 22:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing out the additional link which was also not appropriate, I have removed it as well.

You behavior on Wikipedia seems to indicate a single-purpose account, with your only activities thus far being the addition of links to bobbinis-kitchen.com. I encourage you to explore wikipedia and expand content instead of promoting an outside website.

Links that explain the guidelines and policies that impact the link you are adding can be found in the warning messages which have been attached to your userpage. I encourage you to review those pages, as repeatedly re-adding a disputed link without first getting input from other members of the community is not appropriate behavior. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:42, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

May I ask you

Have you ever had sex?