User talk:Basil Rathbone

Note: This talk page has been archived at User_talk:Basil_Rathbone/Archive.

Vandalism, again?

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Freemasonry. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Vidkun 16:16, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Freemasonry, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vidkun 16:24, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

talk page

Please come discuss your propose changes to Freemasonry on the talk page. I'll make sure they are treated fairly. Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:33, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

I can help you get your changes to stick, but only if you will discuss them on the talk page and stop reverting. Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:51, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Sure.

The basic rule of Masonic Editors is to remove any contribution by Non-Masonic editors demanding it be discussed while allowing all Masonic Editors to make contributions as they like without similar discussion. Similarily any information that already existed on page that is critical of Freemasonry is deleted without discussion while demanding discussion before deleting any information that is pro-masonic. Masonic editors combine their numbers to go-around 3rr rules, acting as a group, and harrass and attempt to get banned non-masonic editors who refuse to accept their hegemony of the pages. Additionly Masonic editors make false 3rr, vandalism, and sockpuppet allegations against any editor who is known to make contributions that are critical of freemasonry. So good luck Hipocrite, I wish you well.Basil Rathbone 17:59, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Step 1. Do not comment on other editors until you have enough experience here to understand that the above comment is not helpful.

Step 2. Do not add any content to the page that fails any of our three important policies -> WP:V WP:NPOV and WP:NOR.

Step 3. When chaning the article, do not delete, only add. Deletions are much harder than addtions.

Step 4. When adding, make sure all of your statements were made by someone else first. All additions must be cited. If you are the person who found out about the conspiracy, then it's not acceptable for publication here. You must find a source that said what you want to say, and then quote it.

If you follow those 4 steps, I will make sure your edits stick. Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:11, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

It is the large group of Masonic editors which keep deleting Material critical of Freemasonry with no discussion. They refuse any contributions by non-masonic editors, deleting them every time, again with no discussion. This is where the problem is. I am causing no difficulties on that page, other than having the 'temerity' to contradict and challenge the Masonic Editors complete control of Freemasonr related pages, a situation that has existed for two years, a situation which Wikipedia has done little if anything to recitify.Basil Rathbone 18:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Removal of comments

Please stop removing editors' comments from your talk page without archiving. It is often considered an uncivil act on the part of the remover if disputes come to mediation or arbitration. --Malthusian (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

I do not wish to have the continual stream of unsubstantiated commentary and accusations by Masonic Editors on my talk page. If I respond to their nonsense I will leave their 'comments' up, otherwise I will delete them. It is my talk page.Basil Rathbone 18:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)