Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bullet Dropper

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Bullet Dropper

Bullet Dropper (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bullet Dropper/Archive.

30 November 2010

Suspected sockpuppets

• Learn From It (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Editors at ANI have stated a suspicion that "Learn From It" is a sock of "Bullet Dropper". "Bullet Dropper" had a sock, "Rapidosity", that is now blocked.[1] TFD (talk) 03:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The Four Deuces on his paranoid witch-hunt again. Bullet Dropper (talk) 04:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Rapidosity was not a "sock." It was just my old account. I migrated to another username. Bullet Dropper (talk) 04:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

What about Learn From It (talk · contribs)? Nakon 04:43, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

What about them? The Four Deuces thinks it's me. It's not. Four Deuces has gone on a witch hunt before like this, accusing me and a few other users of being each other. And it turned out that we weren't. And I got blocked for being those other people BEFORE they did the check. Then they took off the block after they did a check, and didn't apologize. Then reblocked me for expressing discontent over it and complaining about not getting an apology for being wrongly blocked. This is retarded. Bullet Dropper (talk) 04:56, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

You were never blocked for that - only for edit-warring (and comments on talk page). Check your block log and talk page. TFD (talk) 05:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Not true: "Decline reason: This does not address the reason to why you were block which was edit warring while abusing a multiple account with FrenchTouchLiberal (talk · contribs). Please also read WP:NOTTHEM. Elockid (Talk) 03:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)" Bullet Dropper (talk) 05:15, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

There is someone who is a legitimate pain in the ass who has a history of editing like BD but isn't him: see User:FrenchTouchLiberal. Quite possibly that guy's sock. That said, BD is one revert away from blocked indefinitely for unrepentant edit warring - and that's without the sock. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:14, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

I don't edit war. I state the reasons for my edits. Those edit warring are those doing reverts without explaining why other than claiming that the other person is edit warring. It's nonsense. If someone has a problem with an edit, they should explain what the problem with it is. Bullet Dropper (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

---