Jump to content

User talk:Abcassionchan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:




{{unblock | I had been away for weeks, thinking back all the past. Once again, I would like to apologize for creating another account but I didn't make much of it and also, for abusing the privilleges. Thank-you. Criss 12:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)}}
{{unblock | I had been away for weeks, thinking back all the past. Once again, I would like to sincerely apologize for creating another account but I didn't make much of it and also, for abusing the privilleges, I didn't meant to do it before creating that account. Thank-you. Criss 12:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 12:54, 30 November 2010

See also: achieve1

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

24th October 2010

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abcassionchan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I'm seriously ready about editing and clearly understood the Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Also, I would like to cut short the block period. Thank-you. クリッシーサングスタークリッシーサングスター ♥ 03:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abcassionchan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I had understand what have been blocked for. Neither do I want to cause damage nor disruption. I would make a useful contribution instead. クリッシーサングスタークリッシーサングスター ♥ 08:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm unconvinced you understand anything about why you were blocked; we already know you can copy and paste. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that this user has deleted the explanation for the block, and an earlier declined unblock request. Bovlb (talk) 16:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored the declined request. Please do not reumove declined unblock requests while still blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abcassionchan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I didn't wanted to abuse the privileges purposely and I hope to be given one more chance. I have truly admit my mistake of the block and others, I really meant it.

Decline reason:

So you somehow accidentally created yet another account, User:PermenentDecember? I don't think so; I've blocked that one also. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:47, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user is asking that her block be reviewed:

Abcassionchan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I had been away for weeks, thinking back all the past. Once again, I would like to sincerely apologize for creating another account but I didn't make much of it and also, for abusing the privilleges, I didn't meant to do it before creating that account. Thank-you. Criss 12:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I had been away for weeks, thinking back all the past. Once again, I would like to sincerely apologize for creating another account but I didn't make much of it and also, for abusing the privilleges, I didn't meant to do it before creating that account. Thank-you. Criss 12:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I had been away for weeks, thinking back all the past. Once again, I would like to sincerely apologize for creating another account but I didn't make much of it and also, for abusing the privilleges, I didn't meant to do it before creating that account. Thank-you. Criss 12:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I had been away for weeks, thinking back all the past. Once again, I would like to sincerely apologize for creating another account but I didn't make much of it and also, for abusing the privilleges, I didn't meant to do it before creating that account. Thank-you. Criss 12:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}