Jump to content

User talk:Roxanne Harman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m reply to LambaJan
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


Whatever... — <small>Mar. 7, '06</small> <tt class=plainlinks>'''[00:29] <[[user:freakofnurture/ |freakof]][[special:newpages |nu]][[WP:EA |r<sub>x</sub>]][[special:random |ture]][[special:ipblocklist ||]]<font color=002BB8>[{{fullurl:user talk:freakofnurture|action=edit&section=new}} talk]</font>>'''</tt>
Whatever... — <small>Mar. 7, '06</small> <tt class=plainlinks>'''[00:29] <[[user:freakofnurture/ |freakof]][[special:newpages |nu]][[WP:EA |r<sub>x</sub>]][[special:random |ture]][[special:ipblocklist ||]]<font color=002BB8>[{{fullurl:user talk:freakofnurture|action=edit&section=new}} talk]</font>>'''</tt>

:I wasn't the original Willy On Wheels, but I did make edits as:
{{vandal|William on Round Objects}}
{{vandal|Solar-S}}

I know who the originator of this is, but it is not me! --[[User:Roxanne Harman|Roxanne Harman]] 15:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:43, 7 March 2006

Template:TrollWarning {{unblock}}

I will only make genuine edits using this account. --Roxanne Harman 16:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yet you claimed to be an account that has made thousands of vandal edits. How can we trust you? I always like to assume good faith but you don't exactly have a great record -- Tawker 05:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Tawker. I'm a big fan of assuming good faith, and I'd like to think that you can become a productive contributor, but I think many in the community would be very wary of you being unblocked. What's made you change your mind about Wikipedia? Where do you feel you can contribute best? moink 05:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't fair. She hasn't done any vandalism with this account and says that she isn't going to. The only contribution she made that wasn't on her userpage was on someone's talk page and it seemed to indicate that she was done with the willy thing. I don't think she ever claimed to be done with any of her sock puppets, but now she is making that claim. If she starts vandalizing with this account, then we know in the future not to trust this claim, but for now we should assume good faith. -LambaJan 22:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then why would she advertise to be a vandal. If she had just created a normal account and didn't claim to be on wheels there would be no block right now. I'm sorry but I have to disagree with you there, advertising to be a vandal even gloating about being a vandal is an block in my books -- Tawker 00:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever... — Mar. 7, '06 [00:29] <freakofnurxture|talk>

I wasn't the original Willy On Wheels, but I did make edits as:

William on Round Objects (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Solar-S (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

I know who the originator of this is, but it is not me! --Roxanne Harman 15:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]