Talk:Épater la bourgeoisie: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by E-hadj - "→Difference between masculine or femine forms: new section" |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This article is not clear at all. |
This article is not clear at all. |
||
[[Special:Contributions/92.26.208.58|92.26.208.58]] ([[User talk:92.26.208.58|talk]]) 03:05, 1 October 2009 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/92.26.208.58|92.26.208.58]] ([[User talk:92.26.208.58|talk]]) 03:05, 1 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
--[[User:E-hadj|E-hadj]] ([[User talk:E-hadj|talk]]) 03:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC) This has been addressed, the meaning seems clear "to shock the middle classes" |
|||
== Difference between masculine or femine forms == |
== Difference between masculine or femine forms == |
||
Revision as of 03:02, 24 August 2011
What does it mean though?
This article is not clear at all. 92.26.208.58 (talk) 03:05, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
--E-hadj (talk) 03:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC) This has been addressed, the meaning seems clear "to shock the middle classes"
Difference between masculine or femine forms
I seem to recall reading someplace that some purists were discussing the differences between the masculine and feminine forms of bourgeois(ie). In other words, there is allegedly an additional connotation, aside from merely indicating the sex of the subject in question. Any experts know the answer? — Preceding unsigned comment added by E-hadj (talk • contribs) 03:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)