Nuclear marine propulsion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:55, 31 March 2006

Nuclear marine propulsion is propulsion of a Merchant ship powered by a nuclear reactor. Naval Nuclear Propulsion is propulsion that specifically refers to naval warships (see Nuclear navy).

this is your daddy

History

Work on nuclear marine propulsion started in the 1940s, and the first test reactor started up in the United States in 1953. The first nuclear-powered submarine, USS Nautilus, put to sea in 1955.

This marked the transition of submarines from slow underwater vessels to warships capable of sustaining 20-25 knots (37-46 km/h) submerged for weeks on end. The submarine had come into its own.

Nautilus led to the parallel development of further (Skate-class) submarines, powered by single reactors, and an aircraft carrier, Enterprise, powered by eight reactor units in 1960. A cruiser, Long Beach, followed in 1961 and was powered by two of these early units. Remarkably, Enterprise remains in service.

By 1962 the U.S. Navy had 26 nuclear submarines operational and 30 under construction. Nuclear power had revolutionized the Navy.

The technology was shared with the United Kingdom, while French, Soviet, and Chinese developments proceeded separately.

After the Skate-class vessels, reactor development proceeded and in the USA a single series of standardised designs was built by both Westinghouse and General Electric, one reactor powering each vessel. Rolls Royce built similar units for Royal Navy submarines and then developed the design further to the PWR-2.

The largest submarines are the 26,500 tonne Russian Typhoon class.

Civil vessels

Development of nuclear merchant ships began in the 1950s but has not been commercially successful. The US-built NS Savannah, was commissioned in 1962 and decommissioned eight years later. It was a technical success, but not economically viable. The German-built Otto Hahn cargo ship and research facility sailed some 650,000 nautical miles on 126 voyages in 10 years without any technical problems. However, it proved too expensive to operate and was converted to diesel.

The Japanese Mutsu was the third civil vessel. It was dogged by technical and political problems and was an embarrassing failure. These three vessels used reactors with low-enriched uranium fuel.

In contrast, nuclear propulsion has proven both technically and economically feasible for nuclear powered icebreakers in the Soviet Arctic. The power levels and energy required for icebreaking, coupled with refueling difficulties for other types of vessels, are significant factors. The icebreaker Lenin was the world's first nuclear-powered surface vessel and remained in service for 30 years, though new reactors were fitted in 1970. It led to a series of larger icebreakers, the 23,500 dwt Arktika-class, launched from 1975. These vessels have two reactors and are used in deep Arctic waters. Arktika was the first surface vessel to reach the North Pole.

For use in shallow waters such as estuaries and rivers, shallow-draft Taymyr-class icebreakers with one reactor are being built in Finland and then fitted with their nuclear steam supply system in Russia. They are built to conform with international safety standards for nuclear vessels.

See also: list of civilian nuclear ships.

References

AFP, 11 November 1998; in "Nuclear Submarines Provide Electricity for Siberian Town," FBIS-SOV-98-315, 11 November 1998.
ITAR-TASS, 11 November 1998; in "Russian Nuclear Subs Supply Electricity to Town in Far East," FBIS-SOV-98-316, 12 November 1998.
Harold Wilson's plan BBC News story

External links

The Uranium Information Centre provided some of the original material in this article.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''Nuclear marine propulsion''' is propulsion of a Merchant ship powered by a [[nuclear reactor]]. '''Naval Nuclear Propulsion''' is propulsion that specifically refers to naval warships (see [[Nuclear navy]]).
+this is your daddy
-==Power plants==
-Naval reactors are [[Pressurized water reactor|pressurized water]] or [[Liquid metal cooled reactor|liquid-metal-cooled]] types, which differ from commercial reactors producing electricity in that:
-*they have a high [[power density]] in a small volume; some run on low-enriched uranium (requiring frequent refuelings), others run on highly enriched uranium (>20% U-235, varying from over 96% in U.S. submarines [no refuelings are necessary during the submarine's service life] to between 30-40% in Russian submarines to lower levels in some others),
-*the fuel is not UO<sub>2</sub> but a metal-[[zirconium]] alloy (c15%U with 93% enrichment, or more U with lower enrichment),
-*the design enables a compact [[pressure vessel]] while maintaining [[Nuclear safety|safety]].
-The long core life is enabled by the relatively high enrichment of the uranium and by incorporating a "burnable [[Nuclear poison|poison]]" in the cores which is progressively depleted as [[fission product]]s and [[Minor actinides]] accumulate, leading to reduced [[fuel efficiency]]. The two effects cancel one another out. One of the technical difficulties is the creation of a fuel which will tolerate the very large amount of radiation damage. It is known that during use the properties of [[nuclear fuel]] change, it is quite possible for fuel to [[crack]] and for fission gas bubbles to form.
-Long-term integrity of the compact reactor pressure vessel is maintained by providing an internal [[neutron]] shield. (This is in contrast to early [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] civil PWR designs where embrittlement occurs due to [[Neutron radiation|neutron bombardment]] of a very [[diameter|narrow]] pressure vessel.)
-Reactor sizes range up to [[1 E8 W|190]] [[MWt]] in the larger submarines and surface ships. The French [[Rubis class submarine|''Rubis''-class submarines]] have a [[1 E7 W|48 MW]] reactor which needs no refueling for 30 years.
-The [[Russian Navy|Russian]], [[US Navy|US]] and [[Royal Navy|British]] navies rely on [[steam turbine]] propulsion, the French and Chinese use the turbine to generate electricity for propulsion ([[turbo-electric]] propulsion). Most Russian submarines as well as all surface ships since ''[[USS Enterprise|Enterprise]]'' are powered by two reactors. US, British, French and Chinese submarines are powered by one.
-Decommissioning nuclear-powered submarines has become a major task for US and Russian navies. After defuelling, US practice is to cut the reactor section from the vessel for disposal in shallow land burial as low-level waste (see the [[Ship-Submarine recycling program]]). In Russia, the whole vessels, or the sealed reactor sections, typically remain stored afloat, although a new facility is near Sayda Bay is beginning to provide storage in a concrete-floored facility on land for some submarines in the Far North.
-A marine reactor was used to supply power ([[1 E6 W|1.5]] [[MWe]]) to a US [[Antarctic]] base for ten years to [[1972]], testing the feasibility of such air-portable units for remote locations. Russia is well advanced with plans to build a floating power plant for their far eastern territories. The design has two 35 MWe units based on the KLT-40 reactor used in icebreakers (with refueling every 4 years). Some Russian naval vessels have been used to supply electricity for domestic and industrial use in remote far eastern and Siberian towns.
-[[Harold Wilson]] the then British [[Prime Minister]] considered, but did not deploy, nuclear submarines to power [[Belfast]] during the [[1974]] Ulster Workers' Council Strike.
-''See also'': [[United States Naval reactor]]
 ==History==