User talk:202.156.10.11: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:32, 6 December 2011

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Roald Dahl, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Roald Dahl was changed by 202.156.10.11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952405 on 2011-07-01T15:08:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Patrice Wilson. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Please see the talk page for Patrice Wilson (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Patrice_Wilson) for more information on why your edit has been reverted. Thanks. andy4789 ★ · (talk? contribs?) 15:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maris Stella High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ARK Music Factory. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. werldwayd (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Anders Behring Breivik, you may be blocked from editing. Your comment comparing a mass-murder to a 'cool' video game was entirely inappropriate. Chzz ► 02:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Atmosphere of Earth, you will be blocked from editing. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Project, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Richwales (talk · contribs) 01:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lee Taemin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 12:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of feeder teams in football, you may be blocked from editing. Giant Snowman 15:14, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chinese Singaporean, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 11:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Transfer factor with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Template:Z86 Jim1138 (talk) 03:27, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Three separate editors have now reverted your changes to transfer factor. Please do not replace your edits without establishing consensus on the talk page. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 01:24, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Thieves Like Us (band) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Template:Z84 Igoldste (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Environment & Building Technologies. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 13:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Honour and Passion, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. →εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 13:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 66: / Line 66: @@
 [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive. Your recent [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]], as you did to [[:Honour and Passion]], will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]], your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be '''blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice'''. <!-- Template:Uw-longterm --><!-- Template:Uw-vandalism4im --> →[[User:EmadIV|<font color="00CCFF">'''''εϻαd'''''</font>]][[IV|<font color="009900">'''ιν'''</font>]] [[User talk:EmadIV|<sup><font color="FF6600">ΤαΙk</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/EmadIV|<sub><font color="0066FF">Ͼδητrιβμτιoης</font></sub>]] 13:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 :''If this is a [[closed proxy|shared IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->
+<div style="clear: both"></div>[[Image:Octagon-warning.svg|left|30px]]'''You have been {{#if:||temporarily}} [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia {{#if:|for a period of }} as a result of your {{#if:|disruptive edits to [[:{{{2}}}]]|disruptive edits}}.''' You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that [[Wikipedia:Vandalism template link|vandalism]] (including page blanking or addition of [[Wikipedia:Patent nonsense|random text]]), [[Wikipedia:Spam|spam]], deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]]; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] and [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]] will not be tolerated.<!-- Template:Test5 --> [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] ([[User talk:NawlinWiki|talk]]) 15:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)