User talk:69.196.139.250: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:11, 7 April 2006

No title

Just curious, why don't you want to get a user name? --Khoikhoi 04:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer me. --Khoikhoi 04:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

??? --Khoikhoi 05:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello 69.196.139.250, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. Why don't you consider joining with a registration name? There are many great benefits to registering! If you wish to register the following links will help:

Introduction to Wikipedia

Sandbox

About Wikipedia

How to log in

Why create an account?

Choosing a username

Sign the new-user log - introduce yourself!

The Help Desk - post questions, receive answers

Helping Hand Group - request a tutorial or help page be improved or created

Glossary of Wikipedia terms

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. Again, welcome and don't forget to register! --Jelligraze 06:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kurds being an Iranian people

Hey. I agree with you on this, but it would help you a lot if you cite your sources when you make these edits. Thanks. --Khoikhoi 19:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with the page Kurdistan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not write your comments in caps on talk pages. It's considered shouting. Royboycrashfan 04:27, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I have blocked you for 3 hours for making a personal attack against another user (i.e. calling them a criminal). Please don't ever do that again. Also, I suggest you use discussion pages to get a community consensus before continuing. Forcing a on-sided POV onto and article is never a good idea. Thanks! Sasquatcht|c 19:56, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mesopotamia 01:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mesopotamia 02:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mesopotamia made more than 3 reverts on Kurdish people! He should be blocked

Kurdish people

Hey man. I can't block him/her because I'm not an admin. Try asking someone who is one, see the list at Wikipedia:List of administrators. --Khoikhoi 02:54, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. --Khoikhoi 03:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

please see

[1]

Kurdish in Iran is banned

Firsly please sign your comments. Secondly I did not say Kurds in Iran are not allowed to speak Kurdish, but I say Kurdish language is banned from teaching in schools. Kurds are not allowed use their mother tongue in schools. Its banned. ممنوعه. The only language allowed in Iran is Farsi, NOT Azer, NOT Kurdish. Kurds and Azeris must use ONLY Farsi (persian) in schools. It does not matter that there are some newspaper or tv who even their contents are strongly controlled and censored by the Iranian goverment, but as a fact the important point is this that kurdish is not allowed. it is banned. Is it hard to understaned?!!

Mesopotamia 18:04, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please reverted what you added to the article (Being an Iranian people) because it is disputed. there are more neutral sources who disagree with this, explained in the history and roots section. let me talk to u in Farsi ..

آقای عزیز شما یا واقعا منظور بنده‌ را حالی نمیشوید یا خودتان را به‌ نفهمی میزنید. ذکر اینکه‌ کردها کی هستند در یک کلمه‌ امکان پذیر نیست و محال است. در قسمت مربوطه‌ توضیح داده‌ شده‌. ایرانی بودن تنها یکی از ریشه‌های متعدد کردها است. لطفا واژه‌ جانبدارانه‌ ایرانی را از بند اول پاک کنید. Mesopotamia 18:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kurds do not belong to me

there are several milions Kurds in Iran they are not allowed to use Kurdish only farsi only only only only farsi is in use.

I was in hurry and after puting that went out. Now read this: Iran's religious and ethnic minorities remained subject to discrimination and persecution. Representatives of the predominantly Sunni Muslim Kurdish minority protested the appointment of a new governor of Kurdistan province from the Shi'a majority. The authorities overlooked Sunni candidates for the post put forward by Kurdish parliamentarians. The lack of public school education in Kurdish language remained a perennial source of Kurdish frustration Mesopotamia 18:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ما زبان همدیگر را نمیفهمیم. بیا روی مسنجر.

Mesopotamia 18:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is your messenger Id? Mesopotamia 18:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdish flag in Iran

Hi 69.196.139.250,

I'd just like to paste this comment to your talk page:

Mesopotamia, however, is totally incorrect when claiming that Kurdish language is banned in Iran. Kurds in Iran (like the Lurs) are an extremely proud people who are very grounded in their culture and heritage, and they are most definitely not "Persianized." It's true that the regime oppresses the Kurds, like they have done with tribal groups, but they have never been able to ban their languages or prevent them from speaking their languages. SouthernComfort 19:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Khoikhoi 19:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly Yes I am Kurdish. Secondly. I have not focused on Iran (?!). Thirdly whether Turkey had done terrible things or not does no mean t that Iran is innocent, I do not prefer compare them maybe Iran has done worse. and last I like all of Iranians. Diyako Talk + 22:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I do not beleive one word that you user:Diyako:Diyako say. Iran has done worst things?? Right that is why Kurds acroos the world say Turkey and Israel are the worst entities in the Middle East. Do you remember when all the Kurds attacked the Israeli embassies? They acused Israel of selling Kurds out to Turks. Look it up. A lot of misinformation comes out of Israel and by the way Jews are not an ethnc group or race they are a faith. So stop putting Jews as relatives of Kurds.

3RR

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. RexNL 22:42, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --lightdarkness 03:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --lightdarkness 03:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link.
Your own user page.
Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address.
The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
The ability to start new pages.
The ability to rename pages.
The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
The ability to upload images.
The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
The eligibility to become an administrator.
The right to be heard in votes and elections.
Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. --Khoikhoi 00:53, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comments with ~~~~. Thanks. --Khoikhoi 02:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdistan edits

(Copied from User talk:Peruvianllama): Certain individuals want their POVs to overlap the truth. The delete the fact that the Kurds are an Iranian ethnic group and wrote other untrue things in the flag section about Iran. Can you tell me how this issue can be addressed? This article gets vandalized a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.139.250 (talk • contribs) 01:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that you're referring to this ? I understand that Kurdistan and many of the related articles see alot very POV-slanted edits, so I'm glad to see you're interested in reaching a consensus. My best advice is to continue doing what you're already in the middle of doing - trying to reach an agreement on what content is appropriate by discussing the situation on the appropriate talk pages. In the future when you're making an edit (particularly a large edit, to a contentious article), be sure to provide a legitimate reason in your edit summary. Doing so can help avoid confusion, with vandalism notices and the like.

If you have any other questions, or if I can help you with anything else, don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my talk page. Cheers! --P e ruvianLlama^(spit) 07:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look at the talk page and edit history, but I can't promise anything. It seems that anything related to Kurdistan, geographically, ethnically, whatever, is always controversial, and always has people edit warring over somethingorother. And seeing as I have comparatively little knowledge of the people or the area, I'm not sure how much help I can be. But I'll have a look, anyway. As a final, and important note, please sign your posts on talk pages by adding four tildes (like this: ~~~~) at the end of each message. The Wikipedia software will automatically turn this into a timestamped signature, and will make any conversations much easier to follow. By not signing your posts, you make talk pages like Talk:Kurdistan much harder to follow and understand for outsiders to the conflict, like myself. Thanks. --P e ruvianLlama^(spit) 20:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After a brief inspection of the talk page, I think this is excellent advice. Nothing is going to crash and burn if this article stays in an imperfect state for another day or two, so there's no need to be in such a hurry to edit its contents. Use the talk page - discuss the changes, try to achieve consensus, and offer a compromise. --P e ruvianLlama^(spit) 20:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

بیا رو مسنجر کارت دارم Mesopotamia 19:46, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

خایه‌شو نداری بیای رو مسنجر ؟؟؟ Mesopotamia 19:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked you for edit warring on Kurdistan and Iranian peoples, against User:Mesopotamia. This is a 24 hr block, the same as that I have given to User:Mesopotamia. When you return to editing, please discuss as a first option. -Splash^talk 21:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sign Your Posts

Since you are so active on the discussion pages of Kurdistan and related articles, it is very important that you sign your posts. To learn how to do this, click here. I've been trying to follow the conversations, however it is nearly impossible to do so unless you sign your posts (by adding "~~~~" after each message). Thank-you! --P e ruvianLlama^(spit) 03:57, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daykt decem hashtek be wek to cash nim!! Mesopotamia 17:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kurdish people

In regards to your comments on this page, please follow the WP:CIVIL guidelines if you disagree with other editors. Cheers. Dbinder 18:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking

Pleas refran from blanking your talk page of previous messages. Thanks! SWD316 ^{talk to m}^e 00:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Kurdish related pages

Please prior to making controversial changes to the articles, discuss it on the Talk page. There is always room for compromise.Thanx. Heja Helweda 04:22, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-automated template substitution

This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Tawker 20:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 17

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Zsinj^Talk 18:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3rr on Kurdish people

I've blocked you [2] for WP:3RR on Kurdish people William M. Connolley 20:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts

First warning

Regarding your edits here and here. Please sign your posts. Aucaman^Talk 11:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Second warning

You continue not to sign your posts. Here are some examples: 1, 2, and 3. If you continue this way, you could be blocked. Aucaman^Talk 06:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Third warning

Here's another example. Please see WP:SIG and start signing your posts. Aucaman^Talk 07:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth warning

You continue to ignore other editors and post comments without signing them. Here's another example. Please see WP:SIG. It's a Wikipedia guideline and should be enforced. Aucaman^Talk 07:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHat do you mean? Maybe you should help me out......

Yeah, just sign your name like this: --~~~~ --Khoikhoi 07:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page is considered a guideline on Wikipedia. It illustrates standards of conduct, which many editors agree with in principle. Although it may be advisable to follow it, it is not however policy. Feel free to update the page as needed, but please use the discussion page to propose any major changes.

I have aquestion why are you warning be it says I don't have to sign? SO why are yo trying to create some record against me? 69.196.139.250 07:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HOw do I also put the talk thing next to my name?

You don't need the talk. Just use the "~~~~" every time you post something in the discussion. Everyone does it. Sorry I thought you were not signing your comments on purpose. Aucaman^Talk 10:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, can you go in there and sign your posts on Talk:Persian Jews? I'm tired of signing your posts. Aucaman^Talk 11:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian peoples

Thanks man. We need to find academic and/or scientific sources for Diyako to prove to him that "Iranian peoples" is a valid term. Do you know of any? --Khoikhoi 03:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

You need to stop your personal attacks against others. It's against WP:CIV and you could blocked for it. Here are some examples: , 1, 2, 3, and 4. Aucaman^Talk 06:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pofanity

Using profanity is against WP:CIV. here is an example of you doing it. If you continue, you could be blocked. Aucaman^Talk 06:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was not attacking anyone, stop twisting words and I NEVER USED PROFANITY. STOP MAKING PROBLEMS AND ACCUSATIONS.

THat is not to Profanity. It merely states those individuals use POV, are biased, and manipulate words....where did I make a PERSONAL ATTACK. I WAS ALWAYS CIVIL.

"You're so full of it" is definitely a personal attack. Come on, man. If you want people to give you respect please be nice. I respect your views but I just wish you wouldn't be so rude sometimes. --Khoikhoi 06:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was saying that's what YOU said. I never said that you were full of it. --Khoikhoi 07:28, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I might be alittle too frank and blunt, but I asure you I am not making personal attacks.

Say, have you found any sources for the Iranian peoples thing yet? We don't want to see that page deleted. --Khoikhoi 07:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

Would you care to say something at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Aucaman? Thanks. --Khoikhoi 00:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

You are a regular so why don't you join wiki? --ManiF 22:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Acuman keeps on trying to frame me! 69.196.139.250 06:46, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks, Just zis Guy you know? 21:46, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No

No, I'm from the US. I liked the picture however. Perhaps when the fighting's over I could go there some day. --Khoikhoi 03:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's from Eastern and Western Europe. --Khoikhoi 04:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that my father's half English and half Dutch. (Western Europe) My mother is Jewish and her great-grandparents are from places such as Russia and Hungary. (Eastern Europe) --Khoikhoi 04:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The message you left User:Aucaman

The message you left on that user's page was a personal attack, and was removed as such. I strongly recommend you review Wikipedia's policy on the prohibition of personal attacks before you leave any more messages for anyone. I would also recommend you review the civility policy. If you have any questions about any of these, please ask me. Truly, JDoorj a m Talk 03:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was not a personal attack. You can talk to Admin about it you have no right to erase. I SUGGEST YOU READ THE POLICIES YOURSELF!!!! 69.196.139.250 04:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not leave any more hostile messages for User:Aucaman. Period. I've already warned you about this. There's simply no need for them. JDoorj a m Talk 04:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That might be what you view is. I advised him to reform so do not make definitions of hostility up. 69.196.139.250 04:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are there specific issues you have with his editing? JDoorj a m Talk 04:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have problems with reacist comments and one-sided edits bu user:Acuman. I am not even Persian, but what he says about Persians along with other groups such as Kurds and Lors offends me and is uncalled for and untrue. Here is an example of what user:Acuman has written to other editors in discussion: "Long live Iran! Now go after your business. "Dead-worshipper." "You illiterate mental." And your Cyrus the Great was nothing more than an illiterate murderer. At least he had a good excuse. But you...??? And the mercenary is your dad.

I ask you is this right? This is not only a personal attack attack it is an aatack on a whole ethnic group. 69.196.139.250 16:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please show me the page differences where he made those comments. JDoorj a m Talk 18:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last Warning

Regarding this edit: accusing another user in this manner is unacceptable, and goes against wikipedia's policy of no personal attacks. Consider this your last warning, as I see you have been warned about this type of thing several times before, and blocked for other instances of disruptive behavior, as well. --InShaneee 20:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit]: for the last time, stop making such accusations against other users. Regardless of what you think of another user or their contributions, you must be respectful twords them on wikipedia. If you still refuse to stop this, you will be blocked once again. --InShaneee 02:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

You have been blocked for 48 hours for being blatantly hostile and blatantly attacking other editors. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 02:54, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If he makes 'racist attacks'? Warn an administrator about what you believe he has done. If you want to use wikipedia, you must keep your discussions respectful, regardless of how you feel about a certain user. Those are the rules, and there are no exceptions. --InShaneee 05:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- I've blocked you for another 48 hours for your continued hostility. I may be an admin, but that doesn't mean I tell people to 'shut up'. --InShaneee 06:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why? 69.196.139.250 06:39, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should re-read the policies. i only said it as an expression to you and not directly to him. It is not a violation I did not attack him. I merely asked you to talk to Acuman by saying "please tell Acuman to shut up!" That is understandable. i find when most people talk about Wikepedia policy they have no clue to what they are saying. DOn't you? 69.196.139.250 06:43, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. I don't. --InShaneee 06:50, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you do!69.196.139.250 20:48, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you are abusing your admin powers! 69.196.139.250 23:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Norouz

I know. That's why I changed the introduction at Norouz to make it acceptable to all groups, not just the Iranians. I got it from here. Perhaps now we can merge the two articles that he created so we can have just one main article about the holiday.

Let me know what you think of the intro and if it is a good idea to merge the articles. Thanks. --Khoikhoi 21:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You said:

There is only one Noruz which is celebrated by all Iranian people and people of Iranian culture.

There are many countries in Central Asia that celebrate it. Therefore I've changed the intro again. --Khoikhoi 21:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you repeat what you want me to do to the intro? I don't think I understood that. --Khoikhoi 22:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure it is clearly identified as Noruz. It is not similar to Noruz, it is Noruz. I don't even see why there is a need to make a seperate article. In fact all the Central Asian states, Iran, Turkey, the Republic of Azerbijan, and Iraq (representing Kurdistan) filed to have it recognized by UNISCO this year under the name NORUZ, therefore it is one and the same.

here is the connection. All these countries regestered it together as one celebration under the name of Nowruz.

http://www.payvand.com/news/05/apr/1107.html

Thanks for the link. This can be used as proof when we nominate the article to AfD. --Khoikhoi 22:19, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nevruz?

I know many people from Turkey and none believe that stuff and as I read it, I was having quite a laugh. Currently I am very swamped with work, but after Tuesday, I will try hard to clear this mess up. By the way, Eadet Mobarak. I wish you a very happy new year. --(Aytakin) | Talk 21:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on my Talk page

I'm afraid you're wasting your time with me. I'm of Scotch-Irish descent and am not a student of Middle Eastern culture, so I don't have any referents to the dispute you're involved in. Sorry! Longshot14 22:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I said you can merge Nevruz with Iranian Norouz. Since I do not know much on your traditions I do not disagree. Diyako Talk + 22:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

I strongly suggest you write your comments about Nourooz in the noticeboard, instead of, in the discussion pages of other editors like Khoikhoi and others. Good luckZmmz 02:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You mean "ArbCom"? User:SouthernComfort is better at this than me. But the page to find this info is here:

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee --Zereshk 03:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joyeux Nowruz

Merci pour la note, Joyeux Nowruz à vous aussi. Peut l'année suivante être rempli avec beacoup de joie. -- Jeff3000 22:01, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

saal e no mobarak

Norouz mobarak ..calm down man ..its not just Diyako or Aucaman or ..these enthusiasts every year on the eve of it BBC world service announces this day to be the kurdish new year without mentioning the three bloody countries (Iran , Afghanistan, Tajikestan) were its an official celebration needless to say that the Parsi community itself does have a foothold in England and a good lobby to affect it ... but it still measures upto nothing compared to the greater imperialistic policy and the design for this centuary ....--Loosekarma 00:10, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Closed AfDs

As it says at the bottom of the page in bold letters, please do not edit closed AfD pages as you did here. They are kept for historical purposes only, and are not meant to be changed after their closing date. --InShaneee 20:15, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't follow and it was probably a mistake. Run that by me again? Are you watching user:Diyako and user:Acuman so they do not vandalize anymore pages are attack anymore editors for disagreeing with them or proving them wrong? 69.196.139.250 21:51, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon's RfA

Hi, you just voted, but since you're not a registered user, it won't count. If you are, in fact, a registered user, with a hundred edits, could you log on and change your signature. Thanks. AnnH ♫ 23:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, also it was a bit inappropriate for you to mention the ArbCom case about Aucaman, since this was an Rfa page. If you have any grievances talk to an admin.Zmmz 23:43, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HAPPY NEW YEAR

Diyako Talk + 10:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but your statment shows you have an ant-Iranian agenda and bias as stated here; These Iranis lie. The same as their imam and their president. It was an edit conflict and I don't know how old are you that they can so simply trick you. I know who are Iranians!Xebat Talk + 15:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

69.196.139.250 20:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Persian Jews

Some Iranian editors are questioning the fact that Jews and other religious minorities have been historically been called najis by Shia clergy. Aucam an^Talk 20:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why are they bringing his up as an issue? What rational would this have with the article? That has no place on the article. 69.196.139.250 16:36, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Do you have an AOL or MSN id? --ManiF 01:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Dear Anononymous user.

I kindly request you not to use my talk page for launching personal attacks on other users. I prefer to keep a friendly and civil tone with all users here. Cheers Bertilvidet 08:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feeding the trolls

Please do not make comments like this, as it is considered 'feeding the trolls'. This user has already been blocked for his innapropriate comments; responding to them is further considered innapropriate. --InShaneee 18:15, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As for this, this is another personal attack, which you have been blocked for making in the past. Again, please try to remain civil in debates. --InShaneee 22:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll warn you again: stay civil and refrain from making inflammitory comments such as this or you may be blocked again for continued disruption. --InShaneee 18:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This includes most questions regarding a user's credentials. Wikipedia is an 'open' encyclopedia, meaning you don't need any sort of special knowledge or training to use it. Again, discuss article content and edits, not users. --InShaneee 23:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

solution

I really cant do anything. Some people find pleasure in ruining articles and causing confrontation. But you can help by citing your concerns, with evidence, here. Make sure you log in with a username, so your voice will have a User identification and more weight in discussions.--Zereshk 22:21, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Are you really a Muslim?

I'm a Muslim, but I don't know how the particular issue that you brought up concerns me as a Muslim. If the claim is inaccurate then you're right to dispute the claim and since I know very little about Khomeini, I cannot help you. I also don't see any evidence that Aucaman suggested that all, most, are even some Muslim clerics sanction bestiality. --Inahet 00:40, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Khomeini

I did not include the statement about sex with children. Someone else this. The only thing I pointed out is that Khomeini's writings specify non-Muslims to be najis and I have given enough evidence for this. (One from Bernard Lewis; the other from a direct translation of Khomeini's work.) Please don't go around misrepresenting me with statements I do not approve. Aucaman^Talk 22:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These are your direct quotes on the Khoeimini discussion page ;

I had seen some literature out there suggesting that Khomenini approved of sex with children and animals. Now someone has added some of these claims into this article. I'm not going to take them out, but the article is going to receive a dispute tag until these information are verified. AucamanTalk 04:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

@@ Line 393: / Line 393: @@
 ==[[Khomeini]]==
 I did not include the statement about sex with children. Someone else this. The only thing I pointed out is that Khomeini's writings specify non-Muslims to be [[najis]] and I have given enough evidence for this. (One from Bernard Lewis; the other from a direct translation of Khomeini's work.) Please don't go around misrepresenting me with statements I do not approve. [[User:Aucaman|'''Aucaman''']]<sup>[[User_talk:Aucaman|Talk]]</sup> 22:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
+::These are your direct quotes on the [[Khomeini discussion|Khoeimini]] discussion page ;
+'''I had seen some literature out there suggesting that Khomenini approved of sex with children and animals. Now someone has added some of these claims into this article. I'm not going to take them out, but the article is going to receive a dispute tag until these information are verified. AucamanTalk 04:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)'''