User talk:Oda Mari

Japanese translation help at the help desk

Hi Oda Mari. Since you were so helpful when I was doing Masako Katsura (thanks again), when I saw a request for a short Japanese translation at the help desk where I edit quite a bit, I though you might be willing to step in since it looks like something that would be quite easy for a fluent speaker. See Wikipedia:Help desk#Asking a question in Japanese. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Consensus ?

1. Please explain what consensus we need.
2. Adding State Department report is not original research. Please explain why remove entire article[1] The article existed long before my edit.[2]

--Y00tu (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

"you think the addition is needed ask for consensus first on the talk page"--from Oda Mari

I think YOU must explain what consensus we need. --Y00tu (talk) 14:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

No consensus ? No discussion with this topic? --Y00tu (talk) 14:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

As for consensus, please read WP:CONS. See also WP:RS. The article is about what the report was. Your addition seems to be Korean claims and interpretation of the report, only using Korean sources. Neither Japanese nor Korean interpretation of the report should not be included in the report article as WP has the dispute article and both Japanese and Korean claims are mentioned there. See Liancourt Rocks dispute. I agree with Qwyrxian's deletion as WP is not a soapbox. Read WP:UNDUE. See also WP:3RR. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

The current/After 1954 US. govt. stance is no disputable fact. They take a neutral stance. Are you sure the source is not reliable ? --Y00tu (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

IMO, that should be in the dispute article. Not in the report article. Because the report was not "Liancourt Rocks report". It's undue weight to focus on the islets part. If you disagree with me use the article talk page, not here. I'll answer there. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 14:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East, you may be blocked from editing. Please learn more about WP and do not add Japan POV on the report article. The US. Govt. stance changed. Deleteing cureent stance is JPOV. It would be WP:OR. In any event, you have no reverted on that article 3 times in the last 24 hours. If you revert again, you will break WP:3RR. --Y00tu (talk) 21:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

I apologize Oda Mari, but because I am about to request that Y00tu be blocked for edit warring, I also have to ask that be blocked. You went to 4 reverts on that article, and POV pushing is not an exception to the 3RR rules. Next time, don't edit war, even when you are absolutely right per policies--instead, notify a noticeboard (WP:ORN, WP:RSN), or another user. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

First of all, On this case, POV pusher is Oda Mari. Second, You have no clue what is POV pusing. Adding US. govt. stance is not POV pushing. Third, My edit adding, correcting was not violate 3RR rule. However, Oda Mari exactly reverted 4 times without any consensus. --Y00tu (talk) 21:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

• Hello, Oda Mari. Another editor (two actually) reported you on WP:ANEW. I have chosen not to block you, but to issue a warning instead. In future, please remember that reverting violations of WP:NPOV is not a WP:3RR exemption. In these cases, you should stop reverting and follow WP:DR. Happy editing. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 22:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

I am very happy with this result. Again, I did not want to report you, Oda Mari, but I knew that if I didn’t, there was a good chance that a patrolling admin would not block Y00tu either, or fully protect the article, or something else bad. As you can see on the article and it’s talk page, I’ve decided that the whole section just needs to be removed. I will tackle the Rusk documents as soon as I have the opportunity. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your decision, Salvio. Stupid of me! I thought 4rr applied only in a case of the same content reverts. Now I learn what it is and I will be careful from now on. I don't mind your report, Qwyrxian. You've just done what you had to do. Both of you, happy editing! Oda Mari (talk) 09:16, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

User hoax

I am sorry if you believe that I am the user "BradTaylor", but I am not that user, nor have I heard the name. As far as I am concerned, you believe that I am another alias of him, and that I am being used as an alternate username for him. I am not that user, I have not heard of him, and furthermore, I do not even know what articles he even composed until I looked at my message and looked at his user page to see his biography. He may be a coward using two other accounts other than his own, but I can assure you that I am not one of his fake identities. If you need to ask any questions, please do and I will be happy to answer them. Muneshige (talk) 19:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Oda Mari. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

List of gairaigo and wasei-eigo terms

You eliminated important word in the list of gairaigo and wasei-eigo terms. You wrote some are slang, not in dictionary, oh, no less Wasei Eigo is slang, it is not couth, but it is living language in Japanese, you don't get it. --110.162.248.70 (talk) 03:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

The list is already too long with trivial words and needs clean-up and I don't think your addition is appropriate. Because I think the list should consist of more general words as en:WP is not Wiktionary. I disagree with you. The words are not important. Please provide sources if you think they are important. I don't think the words are widely used or household nouns. In other words, I think neither 8-year-old children nor 80-year men and women use them in daily life basis. Besides, the addition was unsourced. You didn't alphabetize when you added them. Please do not ignore the format of the list. If you still think the addition is needed, provide reliable sources and ask for consensus on the inclusion on the article talk page first. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

I understand your POV, but wikipedia is public institutions not the public place indicate personal feeling, you should wait before recasting for the advice of others. Your vandalism will break the peace of community. (110.162.248.70) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.180.31.95 (talk) 08:14, 6 April 2012 (UTC) ←variable　ID. indicate identiy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.180.31.95 (talk) 08:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Sock Puppet?

I've been offline for a couple weeks, and you start a sock puppet accusation against me? Are you really that petty? Are you so mad that I insulted your lack of experience with Japanese history study? I'm shocked that things have escalated to this point. --BradTraylor (talk) 05:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

If you have something to say, please bring the matter to WP:ANI or anywhere you'd think appropriate. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 10:13, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Obviously this is the appropriate place, since your vendetta against me has caused you to continually assault and harass me for the past two months, going so far as to bring up ridiculous "sock puppet" allegations that were doomed to fail since I have not used any other accounts. Why are you so petty? I think that is a fair question, as no reasonable person would go to the extreme lengths that you have to attack me. --BradTraylor (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Moero! Top Striker

Hi Oda Mari. If you don't mind can you help expanding this article a little bit? Story, Video game... My English is not the best, so I don't want to add crappy text. I will add the Episodes later. Thanks in advance. --Hydao (talk) 00:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)