User:Darkest tree: Difference between revisions
Darkest tree (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Darkest tree (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" |
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" |
||
| {{Registered_Editor_lv4_Ribbon}} |
|||
| {{Registered Editor Ribbon}} |
|||
| {{Burba_lv2_Ribbon}} |
| {{Burba_lv2_Ribbon}} |
||
|} |
|} |
Revision as of 16:33, 14 May 2012
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
|
I am Darkest Tree. This is my user page. I try to work on California- and Arizona-related articles and any physical science and aviation articles I come across that I can help out with. My user page is still pretty messy, so don't think too much of my abilities.
Those who will defend authority against rebellion must not themselves rebel.
Articles
Draft articles:
Articles I'm focusing on:
- Kingman, Arizona
- Hualapai Mountains
- June Gloom
- Santa Ana winds
- Sonoran Desert
- Mojave Desert
- Deserts of California
- Upper-atmospheric lightning
My Pet Peeve: The CDP
I think a lot of editors have one particular thing on Wikipedia that really drives them nuts, and they start trying to eradicate it. For me, it's the use of the term "Census-Designated Place." I see this term popping up everywhere in articles on places: small unincorporated towns, villages, communities, and settlements getting referred to solely as "census-designated places." Now, like it says at the top of the census-designated place article, a census-designated place is "a concentration of population identified by the United States Census Bureau for statistical purposes." For statistical purposes...and nothing more! Somehow, lots of people have gotten the idea that the CDP is a suitable placetype name. It is not! No one would ever say "I'm from the census-designated place of Mendocino, California, or "Back in the ol' census-designated place where I grew up..." So while it's the Census Bureau's job to set a threshold for notability of settlements in order to take the census, they, being a federal agency, have no actual authority in the United States over the settlement, naming, or designation of type of small towns and villages. It drives me nuts to come across a Wikipedia article that starts off "Place X is a census-designated place in Y County in the US state of Z." Really? Just call it a town, village, settlement, or unincorporated community. The only important distinction to make is whether a place is incorporated or unincorporated. Then you're talking about a city with its own government versus a place that's governed by its parent county. To use the term "census-designated place" in this context is ridiculous--it should only come into play when discussing census data. So whenever I come across it, I change it.