Jump to content

User:Darkest tree: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 46: Line 46:


{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"
| {{Registered_Editor_lv4_Ribbon}}
| {{Registered Editor Ribbon}}
| {{Burba_lv2_Ribbon}}
| {{Burba_lv2_Ribbon}}
|}
|}

Revision as of 16:33, 14 May 2012

USThis user uses American English.
en-5This user can contribute with a professional level of English.
en-us-caDude, this person is totally a California English speaker.
This user is a proud native of the U.S. State of Arizona.
This user longs for the U.S. State of Arizona.
This user lives in the U.S. State of California.
This user has visited Japan.
This user loves Japan.
This user uses HotCat.

I am Darkest Tree. This is my user page. I try to work on California- and Arizona-related articles and any physical science and aviation articles I come across that I can help out with. My user page is still pretty messy, so don't think too much of my abilities.

Those who will defend authority against rebellion must not themselves rebel.


The Signator lv 4, Awarded for being a Registered Editor for 23 days and completion of 150 edits
The Signator lv 4, Awarded for being a Registered Editor for 23 days and completion of 150 edits
The Novice lv 2, Awarded for being a Registered Editor for 1 month 15 days and completion of 400 edits
The Novice lv 2, Awarded for being a Registered Editor for 1 month 15 days and completion of 400 edits

Articles

Draft articles:

Articles I'm focusing on:

My Pet Peeve: The CDP

I think a lot of editors have one particular thing on Wikipedia that really drives them nuts, and they start trying to eradicate it. For me, it's the use of the term "Census-Designated Place." I see this term popping up everywhere in articles on places: small unincorporated towns, villages, communities, and settlements getting referred to solely as "census-designated places." Now, like it says at the top of the census-designated place article, a census-designated place is "a concentration of population identified by the United States Census Bureau for statistical purposes." For statistical purposes...and nothing more! Somehow, lots of people have gotten the idea that the CDP is a suitable placetype name. It is not! No one would ever say "I'm from the census-designated place of Mendocino, California, or "Back in the ol' census-designated place where I grew up..." So while it's the Census Bureau's job to set a threshold for notability of settlements in order to take the census, they, being a federal agency, have no actual authority in the United States over the settlement, naming, or designation of type of small towns and villages. It drives me nuts to come across a Wikipedia article that starts off "Place X is a census-designated place in Y County in the US state of Z." Really? Just call it a town, village, settlement, or unincorporated community. The only important distinction to make is whether a place is incorporated or unincorporated. Then you're talking about a city with its own government versus a place that's governed by its parent county. To use the term "census-designated place" in this context is ridiculous--it should only come into play when discussing census data. So whenever I come across it, I change it.