Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Samjackson93436: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
Sam here, I spent a week’s compiling all the data, learning the Wikipedia tools to put together the article on Mr. Jenkins. If you look at my account you will see it too a lot of revisions for me to get the article to a good place. I did have my friend (adh80112) help me with the final formatting and clean up due to my limited skill sets. He is not a sock puppet or robot. We both still agree that the article is worth publishing. We have not violated any rules. I did share with friends that the article was out there and I can see some of them have responded to the deletion recommendation that appeared today. I did not ask them to beg for the article to be kept. I am disappointed after all my hard work that I am accused of |
Sam here, I spent a week’s compiling all the data, learning the Wikipedia tools to put together the article on Mr. Jenkins. If you look at my account you will see it too a lot of revisions for me to get the article to a good place. I did have my friend (adh80112) help me with the final formatting and clean up due to my limited skill sets. He is not a sock puppet or robot. We both still agree that the article is worth publishing. We have not violated any rules. I did share with friends that the article was out there and I can see some of them have responded to the deletion recommendation that appeared today. I did not ask them to beg for the article to be kept. I am disappointed after all my hard work that I am accused of being a sock puppet and/or bot. I think when Wikipedia looks at my revisions they will see how much work went into the article and the honesty behind it. --[[User:Samjackson93436|Samjackson93436]] ([[User talk:Samjackson93436|talk]]) 17:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
---- |
---- |
||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 17:02, 16 June 2012
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Samjackson93436
- Samjackson93436 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
16 June 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- GDG93436 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Adh80112 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Collegedanwright (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
All single-purpose accounts participating in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Jenkins. Master created an AFC for the subject on June 7, 2012, after which ADH80112 created the article in mainspace using the same content. GDG93436 and Samjackson93436 similarities make this a duck in my opinion, but requesting CU to assuage any concerns. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 16:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- All are commenting on the deletion discussion for Tim Jenkins (begging for it to be kept, obviously) and have edited almost nowhere else. None of the accounts have edited at the same time, ever. Quack. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 16:33, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Sam here, I spent a week’s compiling all the data, learning the Wikipedia tools to put together the article on Mr. Jenkins. If you look at my account you will see it too a lot of revisions for me to get the article to a good place. I did have my friend (adh80112) help me with the final formatting and clean up due to my limited skill sets. He is not a sock puppet or robot. We both still agree that the article is worth publishing. We have not violated any rules. I did share with friends that the article was out there and I can see some of them have responded to the deletion recommendation that appeared today. I did not ask them to beg for the article to be kept. I am disappointed after all my hard work that I am accused of being a sock puppet and/or bot. I think when Wikipedia looks at my revisions they will see how much work went into the article and the honesty behind it. --Samjackson93436 (talk) 17:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)