Revision as of 13:49, 2 January 2013

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

No RfXs since 10:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC).—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online}

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Messages, etc

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; 2; 3;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

(Please add messages below under a new level-2 heading).

Another easy one

Hi Noun. You mentioned in the past you would be willing to help out with AfC/Request Edits that are easy. I wanted to point out the proposed re-write on the Talk page of JMP (statistical software). Both because the COI issue is easy, since we are making it dramatically less promotional and because you may have an opinion on my use of images as you have in the past.

We plan to take it to GA, so this is a first draft. Even now I'm seeing it could use a sentence about User Groups and a slightly shorter lead, but this will all come out in a Peer Review as GA preparation. CorporateM (Talk) 14:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. If you have any questions, let me know. Many of the sources for this kind of technical topic are less mainstream, so I submit it with somewhat of an expectation of discussing the sources. ;-) CorporateM (Talk) 14:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done mucking about with it for now, and left some notes on talk. I didn't adjust the lead, as the existing one was sourced and all. It should be changed, probably, but I don't know to what right now. I dropped one of the screengrabs; the other is in for now (but may or may not survive to GA). --No unique names 15:14, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What are your thoughts on cropping the images so they could be smaller? For example, the modern screenshot could be cropped so it just shows one display instead of three. CorporateM (Talk) 15:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By not showing as much, I think that might be detrimental. Just my opinion, though. --No unique names 05:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just an FYI - I've started an edit-warring discussion on an ongoing issue where you were previously involved. [1] CorporateM (Talk) 13:49, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 :::What are your thoughts on cropping the images so they could be smaller? For example, the modern screenshot could be cropped so it just shows one display instead of three. [[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 15:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 ::::By not showing as much, I think that might be detrimental.  Just my opinion, though.  --[[User:Nouniquenames|<font color="red">No</font>]][[User Talk:Nouniquenames|<font color="green">unique</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nouniquenames|<font color="blue">names</font>]] 05:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
+Hey, just an FYI - I've started an edit-warring discussion on an ongoing issue where you were previously involved. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#Public_Relations_Society_of_America_.28Result:_.29]
+[[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 13:49, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 ==Please comment on [[Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion#rfc_B680A6D|Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion]]==