Jump to content

User talk:Nouniquenames: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:Nouniquenames/Archive 3. (BOT)
R-41 (talk | contribs)
Line 33: Line 33:
==Please comment on [[Wikipedia talk:Good articles#rfc_6AE9EB0|Wikipedia talk:Good articles]]==
==Please comment on [[Wikipedia talk:Good articles#rfc_6AE9EB0|Wikipedia talk:Good articles]]==
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Wikipedia talk:Good articles#rfc_6AE9EB0|Wikipedia talk:Good articles]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— [[User:RFC&#32;bot|RFC&#32;bot]] ([[User talk:RFC&#32;bot|talk]]) 22:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Wikipedia talk:Good articles#rfc_6AE9EB0|Wikipedia talk:Good articles]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— [[User:RFC&#32;bot|RFC&#32;bot]] ([[User talk:RFC&#32;bot|talk]]) 22:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

== I have removed the comment but it was a reasonable question ==

The question of you both being the same user was a reasonable question given that both accounts had highly similar user name templates with three colours for each of three words that none of which were spaced, and that two users with such a pattern of template were on the same discussion thread. However you are correct that there is no evidence of similar editing behaviour beyond the coincidence of both you and the other user with highly similar user name templates.--[[User:R-41|R-41]] ([[User talk:R-41|talk]]) 14:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:42, 7 January 2013

User:Nouniquenames/navtpl

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 10:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Messages, etc

(Please add messages below under a new level-2 heading).

2013

File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg Have an enjoyable New Year!
Hello Nouniquenames: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000(talk) 07:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2013}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Good articles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the comment but it was a reasonable question

The question of you both being the same user was a reasonable question given that both accounts had highly similar user name templates with three colours for each of three words that none of which were spaced, and that two users with such a pattern of template were on the same discussion thread. However you are correct that there is no evidence of similar editing behaviour beyond the coincidence of both you and the other user with highly similar user name templates.--R-41 (talk) 14:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]