User talk:Kumioko: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→January 2013: That's arguable |
→January 2013: Also |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
:No problem. This is the first block I actually deserved. [[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 21:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
:No problem. This is the first block I actually deserved. [[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 21:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
::No, you also deserved the block for sockpuppetry I gave you. [[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) 22:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
::No, you also deserved the block for sockpuppetry I gave you. [[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) 22:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::That's arguable. Unfortunately the way the rules are written in order for a clean start to be clean, there is a chance of it being called sockpuppetry. Also, there were some false accusions of sockpuppetry in my case. There were assumptions that some edits were me because they came form the same proxy server. That is because the Checkuser tool is far from perfect and difficult to use. [[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 22:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
:::That's arguable. Unfortunately the way the rules are written in order for a clean start to be clean, there is a chance of it being called sockpuppetry. Also, there were some false accusions of sockpuppetry in my case. There were assumptions that some edits were me because they came form the same proxy server. That is because the Checkuser tool is far from perfect and difficult to use. That's why I just went back to using my original one. Because of my high edit count, wide breadth of editing and my knowledge of things like templates, policy and the history of the place it would have been impossible to start over. It would only be a matter of time before someone recognized me. [[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 22:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:27, 19 January 2013
SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.
NoticeHello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Requesting re-hatting of off-topic digression on VPP. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
January 2013 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for referring to another editor as "a piece of trash", while knowing such conduct to be sanctionable as a personal attack: [1]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} , but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 21:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
|