User talk:WelshDaveRyan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:25, 21 January 2013

Welcome!

Hello, WelshDaveRyan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Midgrid (talk) 20:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NOW can we say Armstrong is guilty?

NOW do you agree we can say Armstrong is guilty? How significant are Indurain's baseless speculations now? --Born2cycle (talk) 23:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the slow reply - home internet has been down since 12 January. As I've said before, and have also said on the article talk page again today, my issue was with statements that USADA "found Armstrong guilty" of doping, on the basis of procedural defects. That remains the case. Armstrong's admission has merely rendered it an academic point. WelshDaveRyan (talk) 11:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:37, 15 January 2013 edit Born2cycle (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 31,496 edits →NOW can we say Armstrong is guilty?: expand ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:25, 21 January 2013 edit undo WelshDaveRyan (talk \| contribs) 79 edits →NOW can we say Armstrong is guilty?: Reply Next edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	NOW do you agree we can say Armstrong is guilty? How significant are Indurain's baseless speculations now? --[[User:Born2cycle\|Born2cycle]] ([[User talk:Born2cycle\|talk]]) 23:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)		NOW do you agree we can say Armstrong is guilty? How significant are Indurain's baseless speculations now? --[[User:Born2cycle\|Born2cycle]] ([[User talk:Born2cycle\|talk]]) 23:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
			:Sorry for the slow reply - home internet has been down since 12 January. As I've said before, and have also said on the article talk page again today, my issue was with statements that USADA "found Armstrong guilty" of doping, on the basis of procedural defects. That remains the case. Armstrong's admission has merely rendered it an academic point. [[User:WelshDaveRyan\|WelshDaveRyan]] ([[User talk:WelshDaveRyan#top\|talk]]) 11:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)